Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S.

tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17181048553566554422012-01-10T09:24:43.352-08:00Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S.India needs ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United StatesSatish Chandrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11371419338559231779noreply@blogger.comBlogger21100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1718104855356655442.post-79145065585063244692011-04-10T14:01:00.000-07:002011-12-27T18:41:59.222-08:00Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U. S. (Contd.)PRESS RELEASE JUNE 30, 2011 NATIONAL SECURITY DOCTRINE A report (in Economic Times) is headed "Clamour rises for National Security Doctrine in writing". Indians as a rule are inferior Indian niggers unfit to talk about strategic matters, especially if it involves the White Master in any way, which it always does. That is why in his 'Mein Kampf' Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else". It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people from various countries did that for a thousand years before that. A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though some think three million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them). I am an Indian, but as far above the other Indians as they may be above cockroaches. I have already provided India's National Security Doctrine for which see my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.', which can be found by a Yahoo search with the title and for how I am enforcing it. The "Clamour" (above) is a result of my writing in my press release of June 11, 2011 "It may not be a sin on the part of Ram Dev not to be familiar with the concept of nuclear supremacy for India over the United States or the necessity for it but for RAW, the entire government, all political parties, the media, it is treason most foul punishable by death." The present state of affairs is exemplified by the BJP's Jaitley in the United States, who works for the CIA and the United States, not India and has five families of relatives to visit between Washington and New York, urging the United States to carry through with the castration of India through the nuclear deal and the appointment of the present Foreign Secretary, who works for the CIA and the United States, as ambassador to the United States; most Indian ambassadors to the United States, including Naresh Chandra who has been appointed head of a committee to draw up a National Security Doctrine, have worked for the CIA and the United States. K. Subrahmanyam, who drew up India's national security doctrine earlier, was the kingpin of CIA operations in India (see my blog) and when he came on line along with the CIA Director Michael Hayden and offered to transfer one crore rupees into my account within 48 hours if I agreed to work for the CIA (see the attachment to this E-Mail) and I did not respond, Hayden said "I am concerned that Satish Chandra may not cooperate due to his super-patriotism and high intellect" and K. Subrahmanyam said "I am hoping tht Satish Chandra's patriotism can be purchased. His deductive skills are amazing and he can of great use to the cause of Indo-US friendship". First K. Subrahmanyam said "I admire your courage. But I must know how you know so much about myself, RAW operations, and the C.I.A.-RAW nexus. You are a genius indeed, and we would like to do business with you", and Hayden said "We at the CIA are also amazed at the deductive skills and intellect of Satish Chandra" -- a testimonial to my patriotism and intellect from the enemy, the CIA. But only traitors who work for the CIA are entrusted with the drawing up of India's national security doctrine, not patriots just as only traitors who work for the United States and the CIA, like Manmohan Singh and Vajpayee, get to be India's prime ministers. This is the full text of my press release of July 11, 2011:- "The violence Ram Dev and followers faced was not a billionth part of the violence I faced in a Harvard University seminar which I described in my letter dated July 27, 1982 to Indira Gandhi as prime minister as "the equivalent of an annihilatory nuclear first strike on India". In her reply dated July 29, 1982 she wrote "Dear Mr. Chandra, I have received your letter dated July 27, 1982 and am passing it on to my Principal Secretary to deal with it. Sincerely, Indira Gandhi". But I never heard from the Principal Secretary, P. C. Alexander and as I wrote in my blog "This bugger should be hung up by the heels and asked why". For six and a half months I lived in an M.I.T. library which used to be open 24-hours, sleeping on the chairs at night and going without food for up to three weeks at a time. When I felt sick due to starvation and went to a Cambridge hospital, they refused to admit me. When I went to another Cambridge hospital, the doctor, refusing to admit me said "This is not the Holiday Inn!". The entire Indian community at M.I.T. knew I was starving and being persecuted because my work had put me in a position of leadership in my field and the Indian government sent a minister/secretary to speak to them and reassure them. Later, when I was similarly starving in an M.I.T. dormitory where an Iranian let me in during summer vacation, 1980 -- my pulse was 49 when I once checked it -- and where an Indian graduate student said to his Indian dinner guests while I lay starving on a couch a few feet away "If you start talking like this, CIA peeche par jati hai (the CIA gets after you)", I was almost jailed by M.I.T. campus police when this Indian falsely accused me of stealing a handful of cereal. As I wrote in an article titled "The Soviet Coup" two decades ago, "Year after year after year, I had trouble buying enough flour -- the cheapest source of calories besides margarine -- to keep my weight from falling" to about half of my normal weight. Those who are puzzled by Baba Ram Dev's ineffective call to arms need look no further than my press releases which have guided him more than once, through the medium of RAW which hopes to make him prime minister and still keep India under CIA rule (see my blog below). He needed an army to tackle the Indian government's violence; but India's government works for the CIA and the United States (see my blog). The police violence he faced -- likely prearranged with him by RAW -- was by servants of the United States just as the lathi charges by Indian police before 1947 were by servants of the British. Ultimately it is the violence of the United States that has to be tackled which requires nuclear supremacy for India over the United States; I am India's expert in strategic defence and the father of India's strategic program including the Integrated Guided Missile Development Program and my blog, 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.', can be found by a Yahoo search with the title. It may not be a sin on the part of Ram Dev not to be familiar with the concept of nuclear supremacy for India over the United States or the necessity for it but for RAW, the entire government, all political parties, the media, it is treason most foul punishable by death. Several years ago I wrote (see my blog) that Mani Shankar Aiyar -- he was a Union minister -- sits at CIA-supplied terminals to participate in crimes against me. Today I saw him on NDTV say to Swapan Dasgupta -- who I said was recruited by CIA-RAW after his column admiring me as "Quick Gun Murugan" -- in a program about a painter that he wouldn't say how he is involved "for intelligence reasons". There is no need to 'analyze' the sick behavior above, just destroy it. After my pointing to their treason, above, Naik, the Air Force Chief, the head of chiefs of staff committee, in an interview to Hindustan Times on June 10 '11 said "India should pursue an ICBM programme to acquire ranges of 10,000 km or even more". He failed to name the United States as the enemy. A DRDO scientist said India has the necessary building blocks "but where the warhead should go or what the range should be will have to be a political call". Naik said this at the prompting of RAW -- moving up from Ram Dev's RAW-sponsored call to arms -- so the service chiefs will not be destroyed in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi ( see my blog) and they will not destroy RAW. This kind of fraud will not work. There is no need to have a particular enemy. You create aggressors and invite aggression simply by being weak. Today not being able to destroy ANY nation on Earth is being weak. Not punishing an aggressor -- not destroying the United States coast to coast -- is also being weak." The above paragraph is India's National Security Doctrine and my blog above also provides the wherewithal for implementing it. India has said that its nuclear warheads have been emplaced in various cities/countries such as New Delhi, Washington and New York. The nuclear destruction of these three cities, with a warning that additional U.S. cities will be destroyed if there is any retaliation, is the first step in the implementation of India's National Security Doctrine. As I have said in my blog, killing a few million Indians in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi is nothing more than killing cockroaches. It will not make even a dent in India’s economic or military strength. On the other hand, it will open the flood gates to both economic prosperity for India and its nuclear supremacy over the United States and enable India to eliminate its number one enemy. As I have also said in my blog, the nuclear destruction of Washington and New York with two twenty kiloton bombs, already in position, with two to three in reserve to destroy additional U. S. cities if there is any retaliation, will be a leap forward in the destruction of the United States. The only way it can keep two to three additional cities from being destroyed is by doing nothing in return. Five years later India can finish the job with its coast-to-coast destruction. An ugly white woman columnist at the New York Times wrote that she looks forward to having her columns written by "external cognitive servants" in Bangalore. The Manmohan Singh cabinet a few days ago approved a plan for bringing foreign investment and technology to create one hundred million manufacturing jobs in India, bringing essentially the entire population of India into servitude to the United States. A nation is not strong whose people are servants of an external power. The National Security Doctrine permits Indians to be neither cognitive servants nor manufacturing servants of the United States. 'How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More' in my blog above provides the means for true prosperity and full employment for Indians. Satish Chandra PRESS RELEASE JUNE 8, 2011 BABA RAM DEV'S GURU Those who are puzzled by Baba Ram Dev's call to arms need look no further than my press releases below which have guided him more than once. He needs an army to tackle the Indian government's violence because India's government works for the CIA and the United States, not India (see below). The police violence he faced was by servants of the United States just as the lathi charges by Indian police before 1947 were by servants of the British. Ultimately it is the violence of the United States that has to be tackled which requires nuclear supremacy for India over the United States (see below). Ram Dev is guided by these press releases through the medium of RAW which makes him say things which are in the direction of my views, to make me think that the things I advocate (such as an end to India being 'Gandhian') are being taken care of. Is nuclear supremacy for India over the United States being taken care of? RAW is a branch of the CIA and the bottom line for CIA-RAW is to maintain CIA rule over India. So this fraud on their part will not work. Baba Ram Dev has provided extensive training in Yoga to the armed forces under the Defence Ministry, the paramilitary forces under the Home Ministry, etc. Whatever he has been doing is in good faith. He is "nothing"? He is worth more to India than the entire Cabinet and Parliament and the Indian public knows it. The fraud is on the part of RAW (Baba wouldn't know it is a branch of the CIA or even that it is RAW). It is no sin on the part of Baba not to be familiar with the concept of nuclear supremacy for India over the United States or the necessity for it. For RAW, the entire government, all political parties, the media, it is treason most foul punishable by death. The following are from my press releases dated June 1, 2011 through June 7, 2011:- (June 1, 2011) In my Press Release dated May 31, 2011 I said:- ------------START QUOTE------------- In a letter which appeared in Indian Express, Delhi, under the heading "The Organ and the Keys" two decades ago, I described how RAW was supporting the half dozen terrorist groups in Sri Lanka against one another, playing them like the keys of an organ, bringing them all under its control to produce whatever music it wanted. I have said Anna Hazare's fast was sponsored by CIA-RAW (see my blog below) but now RAW is also supporting Baba Ram Dev and if it makes him prime minister, will keep the threat of bringing his office under Lok Pal and, with true or false charges of corruption against him, keep him under its control. The Intelligence Bureau, out of which RAW was created, did this for half a century under the British -- instigating Hindu-Muslim conflicts and partition of India, etc. -- and continues the tactic to this day. Other activities of CIA-RAW, the real ruler of India, are deadlier, such as sabotaging its defence and economy. I am India's expert in strategic defence and the father of India's strategic program including the Integrated Guided Missile Development Program and in "What You Should Know About RAW" in my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' which can be found by a Yahoo search with the title, I ended with "The point is that all the tens of thousands of RAW employees are guilty of the gravest treason and deserve the death penalty. So do all those -- politicians, civil servants and others -- who are willing collaborators of CIA-RAW." On September 24, 2005 I wrote "the Armed Forces should arrest the top 1,000 or so officers of RAW (quietly if they go quietly, otherwise noisily) as a first step to the total destruction of this agency which functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India.". The service chiefs have not done this and will be destroyed in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi that will destroy RAW; see my blog. In the same letter in Indian Express I pointed out that a New York Times report shortly before the 1991 General Elections and Rajiv Gandhi's assassination said that Rajiv Gandhi told the foreign media in New Delhi that the Indian armed forces had "gone berserk in Kashmir. Human rights have been violated in Kashmir", that this comment of his was directed at U.S. lawmakers who control the CIA money which elects and keeps India's prime ministers in office and that the Indian press had failed to report this comment, controlled as it is by the CIA. His assassination followed within days of the publication of this letter of mine. -------------END QUOTE------------------ Now a PTI report says "A day after stating that the Prime Minister and Chief Justice of India should not be brought under the ambit of the proposed Lokpal Bill, yoga guru Baba Ramdev on Wednesday did a volte-face saying he did not make such a statement". This volte face on his part was caused by what I said in the above press release just as Rajiv Gandhi's assassination was caused by what I said in my letter above in Indian Express because of which Swapan Dasgupta wrote a column in Indian Express admiring me as "Quick Gun Murugan". But because of a prohibition by CIA-RAW of any mention of the greatest living Indian in the media, the Indian public never knows what is happening and India remains poor, weak and enslaved and this will not change till the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. (June 2, 2011) It is not just CIA money which brings and keeps India's prime ministers in office; CIA-sponsored murders and wars also bring and keep them in office. Indira Gandhi was made prime minister by the KGB's murder of Lal Bahadur Shastri in Tashkent at the CIA's request -- see my blog above. After Atal Behari Vajpayee -- a lifelong British and then CIA agent -- lost a vote of confidence as prime minister, the CIA ordered its agent, Musharraf, to start the Kargil war, with the help of RAW, to make Vajpayee win the pending elections; see my blog. Even Rajiv Gandhi was brought to office by CIA-RAW's murder of Indira Gandhi; see my blog. It was CIA-RAW's murder of Rajiv Gandhi which made P. V. Narasimha Rao prime minister and Manmohan Singh his CIA-appointed finance minster; see my blog. It was CIA money which made Manmohan Singh win the vote of confidence on the nuclear deal and remain prime minister. (June 3, 2011) Well, it was money from the Italian woman who received billions of dollars in CIA money in the past but has received many more billions in kickbacks since then. And it were the CIA-RAW-sponsored exposes of the corruption under Manmohan Singh which were meant to bring the Italian woman's son to the office of prime minister. If, instead, a "satyagrahi"/fast-unto-deather like Ram Dev becomes prime minister, it will keep India poor, weak and enslaved and under CIA rule. (June 4, 2011) It was the CIA-sponsored expose of the Bofors kickbacks -- to arm twist Rajiv Gandhi when he at first refused to have India's population used as guinea pigs for an AIDS vaccine development -- which sent Rajiv Gandhi out of office in 1989; see my blog. Following the example of the Shah of Iran, Indira Gandhi had sought to get some independence from CIA money by getting money through kickbacks on defence purchases. The Bofors and HDW exposes put an end to that and brought Rajiv Gandhi back into dependence on CIA money and under CIA control. After his death, a large amount of CIA money was funneled to his wife through the KGB. I have said -- see my blog -- that the DMK government was having Indian currency printed in China and using it for bribes to A. Raja, freebies to the people, etc. By exposes of corruption by DMK ministers and jailing them, CIA-RAW are putting an end to this. Why not openly implement my proposal about money (see 'How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More' in my blog)? Because the CIA has given everyone in India a stake in keeping the crimes against me covered up -- see my blog -- because the CIA's ability to keep India poor, weak and enslaved and under its rule depends on it. (June 5, 2011) Whereas the black money abroad if brought home will be finite and in foreign currency and can ultimately only be used to buy foreign goods and services and through the multiplier effect -- see my blog -- will benefit foreign economies more than the Indian economy, the money available from my proposal about money is infinite and in Indian currency and will circulate almost entirely in the Indian economy so that the benefit to the Indian economy from each rupee will be many times greater. What was missing in Baba Ram Dev was an appreciation of the role of violence. Now that he has tasted violence, if he wants to make nuclear supremacy for India over the United States -- see my blog -- and the implementation of my proposal about money his two point agenda, he should go for it. (June 6, 2011) A headline says "India okays biggest deal with US for C-17s at $4.1 bn". It is not difficult to see it benefits the U.S. economy, not India's and is deadly for India's defence. Since Manmohan Singh works for the CIA and the United States, not India -- see my blog -- removing this criminal-traitor from office is the first step. (June 7, 2011) Ram Dev was demanding the death penalty for holders of black money and saying the tide of support for himself will sweep the government away. As soon as I wrote above Manmohan Singh works for the CIA and the United States, he forgave Manmohan Singh and the government, asked his followers to stop fasting and offered talks to the government. Like Hazare, Ram Dev's movement was CIA-RAW-sponsored and managed to keep India 'Gandhian' and under CIA rule. Nehru, like M. K. Gandhi (the homosexual who wrote to the white man "How completely you have taken possession of my body. It is slavery with a vengeance") a life-long British agent -- see my blog -- as he admitted to U.S. ambassador Galbraith, suffered lathi charges by police and went to jail for years at a time. This kind of fraud has been successfully played on the Indian public for a century. The prepositioning of five to six nuclear warheads in New Delhi, Washington and New York is the start of India's freedom, not anything M. K. Gandhi or Nehru did or Hazare and Ram Dev are doing. Satish Chandra PRESS RELEASE MAY 9, 2011 NUCLEAR DESTRUCTION OF THE UNITED STATES According to the American announcement, Osama bin Laden was not killed DURING the firefight but executed with a shot in the head AFTER he had been taken into custody. Like CIA kingpin K. Subrahmanyam's fake death, his death -- in preparation for a withdrawal from Afghanistan -- is a consequence of India having prepositioned five to six nuclear weapons in various cities/countries for the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then the coast-to-coast destruction of the United states (see below) and may be similarly fake. I am India's expert in strategic defence and the father of India's strategic program, including the Integrated Guided Missile Development Program and in my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.', which can be found by a Yahoo search with the title, I have shown that all terrorism and insurgencies in the Indian subcontinent and in much of the rest of the world are sponsored by the C.I.A. Both Pakistan's ISI and India's RAW function as branches of the C.I.A. and participate in terrorism and insurgencies throughout the subcontinent, under direction of the C.I.A. (Within the above blog look for 'What You Should Know About RAW'). The goal of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and partial occupation of Pakistan is eventual occupation and overt colonial rule over the subcontinent as a whole; India is already under covert CIA rule, through RAW. To end this, India has said that five to six nuclear bombs have been prepositioned in various cities/countries such as New Delhi, Washington and New York -- see my blog -- for the nuclear destruction of New Delhi, Washington and New York and later the coast-to-coast destruction of the United States. Indian media people have been covering the white man's wedding as if he is India's prince. How many stories have you carried about India's sovereign (see my blog above) who is also the most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth whose toe-nail clippings are worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion-plus Indians combined? RAW has been putting out a breathless story on the white man's wedding, in the Times of India, NDTV, etc., about every five minutes just as it promotes the AIDS woman and her gang-rapist son. It is all part of maintaining white rule over India (see 'What You Should Know About RAW' in my blog above). India's emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar, was kept in exile while the British ruled India just as India's sovereign is being kept in exile while the CIA rules India. Tens of millions of Indians killed by the British in just the ten years after 1857 -- depopulating entire regions so there weren't any men left to till the land -- and many more right up to 1947 is how you generate love and admiration for conquerors -- Americans doing the same in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. call it 'pacification' -- loved and admired by one Swapan Dasgupta who wrote a column admiring me as "Quick Gun Murugan" about twenty years ago at which he was recruited by CIA-RAW. India will depopulate enemies -- to hell with love and admiration -- with nuclear bombs. Regardless of what happened to Osama bin Laden and how quickly the Americans withdraw from Afghanistan, the destruction of CIA rule over India by nuclear bombs (above) will proceed unless the testing of high yield thermonuclear warheads to their full yields and of missiles to carry them to the continental United States to their full ranges to build, within five years, thousands of such weapons starts immediately. The United States raid near Islamabad is a leap forward in the U.S. occupation of the subcontinent -- the opposite of a withdrawal from the subcontinent. The Indian Air Force chief who applauded the raid deserves to be executed on the spot with a bullet to the head but will die in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi without which the building of the weapons above will not start. The nuclear destruction of Washington and New York with two twenty kiloton bombs, already in position, with two to three in reserve to destroy additional U. S. cities if there is any retaliation, will be a leap forward in the destruction of the United States. The only way it can keep two to three additional cities from being destroyed is by doing nothing in return. Five years later India can finish the job with its coast-to-coast destruction. I have shown in my blog above that India will win a nuclear war with the United States, starting from this moment, no matter what the United States does. Even if the United States kills 75% or 95% of India's population, India will not only survive but flourish. The United States, on the other hand, will not survive even two twenty kiloton blasts in Washington and New York. After I wrote the above, the criminal Negro slave of the Americans dropped Osama bin Laden's death and 'pivoted' to the U.S. economy. But the destruction of the United States by India will proceed as planned. With all the criminals, jews and non-jews, the United States is harboring (see my blog), the criminal Negro slave could be whipped in a public square and hanged from a lamp-post; but justice will not be done without its coast-to-coast destruction. After I wrote the above the headlines said "US takes heat off Pakistan on bin Laden's hideout". That does not change India's plans, either. After I wrote the above, Manmohan Singh called the Negro slave to promise ever-lasting loyalty to India's enemies. But such cockroaches in New Delhi, due to perish along with their masters in Washington and New York, do not speak for India. An AP report is headed "US official: Pakistan says it will grant US access to bin Laden’s wives left behind after raid". Like the U.S., the sponsor of all terrorism in the world -- see above -- will grant access to Obama's wife's ugly twat to drain inspectors from the subcontinent. In my blog I wrote:- ""Who will be destroyed by the nuclear bomb in New Delhi besides the Laloo Yadavs and Chatterjees (see below)? A bent old man who bent even lower to the Yadavs the day after he recorded the Yadavs, with bags of money, facilitating the invasion of India by firangis and was himself recorded, with folded hands, paying obeisance to the Yadavs. The military and the civil servants who have always been loyal to the firangis (see below). The population of Delhi/New Delhi which, by the hundreds of thousands, stood and watched silently India’s emperor, after surrendering his sword, arrested and led away by a lone Englishman with “fifty black sowars” -- the Englishman sent the Indian emperor’s jewel-encrusted sword to the British monarch -- though, as the Englishman wrote home to England, anyone of them -- his fifty black sowars -- could have brought him down with a single shot. Why did the Indian emperor have to surrender his sword to the lone firangi and submit to being arrested? He had a sword but he lacked supremacy in arms. Today supremacy in arms is nuclear supremacy. No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India. These are the people who will be destroyed." Why did India's prime minister have to bite her lip like a shy girl to appease Americans? India's prime minister did not have supremacy in arms. Why did India's greatest scientist have to starve while the Indians at MIT silently watched and some actively collaborated with the Americans in his degradation, like Delhi's population silently watched India's emperor arrested by a lone Englishman and the "fifty black sowars" actively collaborated in it? Because, as in 1858, India does not have supremacy in arms. India's armed forces today are just like those fifty black sowars as are all civil servants, RAW, etc. and the population at large is just like the residents of Delhi in 1858, only worse. Indira Gandhi is considered like "Durga" for taking military action in Bangladesh but in fact she had to go seek permission of the White Master for that and the U.S. president, Nixon, kept her waiting 45 minutes before seeing her." I have brought India to the point where it can destroy its enemy with just two twenty kiloton warheads delivered to Washington and New York, with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities like Chicago if there is any retaliation and suddenly increase its power millions of times -- despite the treachery of India's prime ministers and the slavishness of the Indian people." Well, the warheads don't have to be "delivered". They are already in place. Satish Chandra PRESS RELEASE APRIL 26, 2011 CIA RULE OVER INDIA I. The biggest scandal in India is C.I.A. rule over India through RAW and C.I.A.-RAW's control of India's prime ministers, politicians and media. The Indian press has been full of headlines like "Indian-American wins Pulitzer prize for book on cancer". What is so great about a history of cancer? Has he found a cure for cancer? I have. The entire physiology of an organism can be conceived of as a network of interlinked biological clocks. The disease process in cancer involves changes in biological clocks. In my laboratory research with rats I discovered a way to drastically modify biological clocks at a very fundamental level which provides a way to alter the disease process in cancer, as well as do other things such as drastic changes in perception. The physical world or a particular physical object is a collection of properties (color, size, shape, etc.) which are products of perception formed during phylogenesis (evolution of the species) and ontogenesis (conditioning during the life of a particular organism). Miraculous acts of Indian Yogis in altering both their own physiology (such as living on little or no food) and properties of the physical world (such as overcoming gravity or walking through walls as Deepak Chopra, M.D. described seeing Maharishi Mahesh Yogi do in one of his books) are a matter of altering biological clocks, such as drastically slowing down breathing rate. I am India's expert in strategic defence, the father of India's strategic program including the Integrated Guided Missile Development Program and the world's greatest scientist and my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.' which can be found by a Yahoo/Google search with the title describes how C.I.A.-RAW keep India poor, weak and enslaved by suppressing the best and rewarding the mediocre: "India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian publicly tortured in Harvard seminar, systematically and totally starved for up to 3 weeks at a time, made semi-starved and homeless and even blind for years, kept under 24-hour audio and video surveillance as well as surveillance of communications and electrical typewriter and computer use, document creation and photocopying, etc., by satellite for more than past 3 decades, systematically harassed and in poverty and neutralised and robbed of his work at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year, robbed of crores in his money and property in India by C.I.A.-RAW, forced back into exile in the U.S., all with full cooperation and participation of India's RAW and India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled prime ministers, politicians and media" and how this means the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then the coast-to-coast destruction of the United States. Within the above blog look for 'How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More' and 'What You Should Know About RAW'. II. BURN ALL M. K. GANDHI PORTRAITS IN PUBLIC BONFIRES Who is the real Mahatma and Father of the Nation? Anna Hazare's fast was sponsored by C.I.A.-RAW, was meant to keep India 'Gandhian' -- because of recent disclosure of M. K. Gandhi, a lifelong British agent, being homosexual and writing to the white man 'How completely you have taken possession of my body. It is slavery with a vengeance' -- and to divert attention from what is said by the greatest living Indian, keep India a beggar and slave, keep India from building thousands of nuclear-armed missiles to destroy the United States to end its slavery and maintain white rule over India. My blog above also shows how the criminals of the Supreme Court, Parliament and Executive have shown their indifference to India’s sovereignty. India’s sovereignty rests only in me. I am India’s sovereign. And how I am enforcing it. III. A news report starts : "ISRO Chairman S. Radhakrishnan (centre) holds a model of PLSV-C16 rocket with PSLV-C16 Mission Director P. Kunhikrishnan (left) and Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre Director P.S. Veeraraghavan. Director of ISRO Satellite Centre T.K. Alex and Director of Space Applications Centre R.R. Navalgund (right) are the others present". This is typical of India's nuclear, space, defence and high technology projects; almost all of them are headed by Tamil enemies. What is the matter with U.P. and Bihar -- they don't produce any engineers and scientists? I, the world's greatest scientist, have been living in exile in North America for decades due to harassment by Tamil enemies like K. Subrahmanyam; see my blog above and within it look for 'Kill the Tamil Snakes'. My blog also describes the sabotage of India's nuclear, space, defence and technology programs as well as economy by the Tamil snakes to bring and keep India under the domination of white countries. I have pointed to the sabotage of India's GSLV rocket by the Tamil snake who heads ISRO; don't be fooled by the recent non-sabotage of the smaller PSLV rocket; it is meant to keep India in the 'thus far and no further' mode and this Tamil snake took the opportunity to announce a joint moon mission with the United States. Another report says "ISRO to conduct GSLV test flight in 2012 with Russian cryogenic stage engine ... said S Ramakrishnan , director , Liquid Propulsion Systems Centre of Isro". Another report says "V. Narayansamy, minister of state in the prime minister’s office, said: ‘Heartiest congratulations to the entire department of space. The scientists have proved their expertise in launching the PSLV rocket.’ " IV. India has said that five to six nuclear bombs have been prepositioned in various cities/countries such as New Delhi, Washington and New York; see my blog above. But has the C.I.A. rule over India been taken care of? It is not the prepositioning alone that will take care of it but three simultaneous explosions in New Delhi, Washington and New York. V. As I wrote in my blog above "Indians as a rule are inferior Indian njggers unfit to talk about strategic matters, especially when it involves the White Master in any way, which it always does. That is why in his only reference to India in his 'Mein Kampf', Adolf Hitler said "As for India, I would rather see India under the British than under any one else". It is not just that a handful of the British from half way around the world ruled India for centuries; a lot of other people did that from various countries for a thousand years. A modern day Babar will start each day by killing a million Indians before breakfast every morning, though some think three million will be better (this number can be herded into fairly small extermination circles and then a neutron bomb exploded over them).I am an Indian, but as far above the other Indians as they may be above cockroaches." Satish Chandra PRESS RELEASE APRIL 7, 2011 HAZARE'S FAST IS C.I.A.-RAW-SPONSORED TO KEEP INDIA 'GANDHIAN' & NOT BUILD THOUSANDS OF NUCLEAR-ARMED MISSILES TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES & END ITS SLAVERY The "Gates Foundation, which has $80 million worth partnership with Bihar government in health sector, has shown its interest in expanding cooperation in agricultural sector too ... said a beaming Gates while lavishing praise on chief minister Nitish Kumar sitting beside him" (Times of India, March 27 '11). Why does BEGGAR Bihar need Gates' CHARITY? Tamil Nadu gets Indian currency secretly printed in China which is used for numerous freebies to people -- from food to houses to mixers to color TVs to lap top computers, etc. -- for bribes to A. Raja and many other things because of which the Tamils have been calling Bihar and U.P. backward and stupid. This is what I said in my Press Release dated January 17, 2011:- "In my article titled "A Magical Solution to Disaster Relief" I gave the formula: the government should invite any and all individuals and organizations including companies to "Find a need and fill it and be reimbursed at double your cost" -- in normal times a 50% profit may be enough incentive -- to provide food, shelter. clothing and services to shanty-dwellers and be reimbursed at 50% over their cost; the only condition should be that the goods and services they provide must be ADDITIONAL PRODUCTION and not taken from existing supplies. The shanty-dwellers can also be employed for the production. The government has an unlimited amount of money simply by printing it so long as it is used for PRODUCTION; see my article "How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per Year Or More" which can be found by a Google/Yahoo search with the title. The above applies to ALL goods and services to fill ALL societal needs." By suppressing any mention of me in the media via K. Subrahmanyam and C.I.A.-RAW, Tamils have been reaping the benefits of my work while denying them to the stupid North Indians who are full participants in this BEGGARING of India. And how has this BEGGARING of India been done? I have described it many dozens of times in these press releases, such as that dated January 30, 2011 and here it goes once more: "I am India's expert in strategic defence and the father of India's strategic program, including the Integrated Guided Missile Development Program. In my blog titled 'Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.', which can be found by a Yahoo search with the title, I have described how the C.I.A. keeps India poor, weak and enslaved: "India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian publicly tortured in Harvard seminar, systematically and totally starved for up to 3 weeks at a time, made semi-starved and homeless and even blind for years, kept under 24-hour audio and video surveillance as well as surveillance of communications and electrical typewriter and computer use, document creation and photocopying, etc., by satellite for more than past 3 decades, systematically harassed and in poverty and neutralised and robbed of his work at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year, robbed of crores in his money and property in India by C.I.A.-RAW, forced back into exile in the U.S., all with full cooperation and participation of India's RAW and India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled prime ministers, politicians and media -- to keep India poor, weak and enslaved" and how this means the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then the coast-to-coast destruction of the United States." According to India, five to six nuclear bombs have been prepositioned in various cities/countries such as New Delhi, Washington and New York. Three simultaneous explosions of twenty kiloton each in New Delhi, Washington and New York, with two or three in reserve for destroying additional U. S. cities if there is any retaliation, will end C.I.A.-rule over India. This will enable India to build, within five years, thousands of nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the United States and accomplish its coast-to-coast destruction. The banning of the book about the homosexuality of M. K. Gandhi -- like Nehru a lifelong British agent -- who wrote to the white man 'how completely you have taken possession of my body. It is slavery with a vengeance' and the media suppression of me and my advocacy of nuclear supremacy for India over the United States both reflect how completely the white man has taken possession of India. It is slavery with a vengeance. In my blog above I have described how this enslavement was done (see 'Source of Manmohan Singh's 'Deep Love' for Bush') by the British killing over ten million Indians in just the ten years after 1857. That the behavior of the enemy's Indian agents is due to the terrorization and subjugation inflicted on India by the white man does not mean such agents don't have to be eliminated; in war even soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or advance on enemy positions have to be shot on the spot. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- the seat of C.I.A. rule through its Indian agents -- Washington and New York, followed by the coast-to-coast destruction of the United States, will end this slavery. Anna Hazare's fast, sponsored by C.I.A.-RAW, is meant to keep India 'Gandhian', divert attention from what is said above by the greatest living Indian and keep India from building thousands of nuclear-armed missiles to destroy the United States to end its slavery. This does not mean that Anna Hazare is a C.I.A.-RAW agent. C.I.A.-RAW instigated the fast & the huge groundswell of support for it and pre-arranged the whole thing with the government, the Congress party, etc. India is being kept a beggar and slave by suppressing the greatest living Indian and this will not be allowed. After my reference to C.I.A.-RAW having instigated the fast, Hazare wrote to Manmohan Singh: "1. It is being alleged that I am being instigated by some people to sit on this fast. Dear Manmohan Singh ji, this is an insult to my sense of wisdom and intelligence. I am not a kid that I could be "instigated" into going on an indefinite fast. I am a fiercely independent person. I take advice from many friends and critics, but do what my conscience directs me to do. It is my experience that when cornered, governments resort to such malicious slandering. I am pained that the government, rather than addressing the issue of corruption, is trying to allege conspiracies, when there are none." Since he was responding to what I said, why did he address his response to Manmohan Singh rather than to me? He was observing the C.I.A.-RAW prohibition that there will be no mention of the greatest living Indian in the media. This shows he is indeed a C.I.A.-RAW agent, not their unwitting tool. The script had called for his breaking the fast with a glass of orange juice from the hand of the white woman who is the beneficiary of most of India's multi-trillion-rupee scams -- to neutralize what I have said about the white man being India's enemy -- and it is going according to the script. He has already expressed his gratitude to the white woman for asking him to break the fast. The attention-diverting publicity given to Hazare and his inconsequential demands is meant to keep India in beggary and slavery and shows how C.I.A.-RAW control India through the media just as British intelligence kept India a beggar and slave through its creation, M. K. Gandhi; see 'What You Should Know About RAW' in my blog above. K. Subrahmanyam had staged his fake death right after India said that five to six nuclear bombs have been pre-positioned in various cities/countries. In my blog above I wrote that K. Subrahmanyam may be able to flee to the United States but most of the media people who are participating in these crimes against India and obeying the C.I.A.-RAW prohibition of any mention of the greatest living Indian in the media will not be able to flee. Satish Chandra PRESS RELEASE NOVEMBER 14, 2008 -JULY 8, 2010: Type and Yields of Nuclear Weapons to Destroy New Delhi and the United States In the nuclear destruction of New Delhi, the two complexes to focus on destroying are: i) RAW headquarters on Lodhi Road : 28 degrees 35 minutes North, 77 degrees 14 minutes East ii) North Block and South Block on Raisina Hill : 28 degrees 37 minutes North, 77 degrees 12 minutes East (More precise coordinates are available). The distance between them is of the order of three miles. A single blast in the megaton range can do the job or two blasts of even twenty kilotons each. As I have said, ideally the entire population of New Delhi/ Delhi should be killed, but it is not necessary. The type, yield and number of nuclear weapon(s) is a matter of convenience as is the mode of delivery. Neutron-type weapons designed for use against cities and population centers become important when thousands of nuclear weapons are later detonated to destroy the United States. But one or two nuclear weapons detonated to destroy New Delhi need not be of any particular type. The fact that thousands of nuclear warheads -- neutron-type weapons designed to be effective over as large an area as possible per warhead -- will be exploded to destroy the United States means that the vast majority of the missiles carrying them need not be precisely guided to a target; even a deviation of a few miles from the nominal target would not matter so long as together they cover, in a statistical sense, the populated areas of the continental United States; only a few missiles may need to be guided accurately to ensure that some selected targets are destroyed. The task thus becomes one of producing a large number of warheads and a large number of missiles that can take them to the continental United States but which need not be guided very accurately. The large numbers of missiles and warheads, because of their large numbers, cannot be stopped by anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems the United States has or will have in the foreseeable future, further simplifying the task. Time is important so that these large numbers of warheads and missiles are produced and launched as quickly as possible. I have already said that the emphasis should be on road and rail mobile ICBMs or concealed silo-based missiles that can be quickly produced in large numbers rather than on nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed submarines (SSBNs) which take a long time to produce. Equally important is getting enough fissile material for the necessary number of warheads for which all of India’s nuclear reactors will be operated in the military mode. The sooner the nuclear destruction of New Delhi occurs, the sooner India can get on with the main task since time -- doing this quickly -- is as important as producing a large number of missiles and warheads. I have referred to neutron-type (that is, enhanced radiation) weapons designed for use against cities and population centers; more of their energy goes into producing deadly radiation (fast neutrons) and less into producing heat and blast. But even if regular kinds of thermonuclear weapons (rather than enhanced radiation weapons) are used, five thousand such warheads of two hundred kilotons each, targeted at the four thousand largest population centers in the United States -- the larger cities will have more than one warhead assigned to them -- will have a total yield of one thousand megatons, that is the combined yield of twenty of the fifty megaton hydrogen bomb the Soviet Union once tested and these five thousand warheads will do a good job of destroying the United States. So even for destroying the United States, the regular kind of thermonuclear weapons can be used rather than neutron-type weapons. There are substantial distances between population centers in the United States even in its thickly populated areas such as the East Coast, so the regular kind of thermonuclear weapons will be properly targeted and guided and, since the United States can be expected to start putting out erroneous coordinates for its population centers, their coordinates should be obtained from present or past paper, not future or electronic, sources -- unless India’s own satellites are the source and the coordinates are cross-checked for fudging by traitors because Government of India traitors through ISRO launched an Israeli spy satellite of the kind that the U.S. National Security Agency/ C.I.A.-RAW have been using to do immense damage to India, India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for the past 31 years, etc. and billions are poured into Israeli radars, etc., instead of Indian R & D by Government of India traitors, though all this will come to an end with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- and it is not too early to start compiling lists of five thousand targets and their coordinates, starting with the largest cities; Manhattan island alone in New York City will need to be targeted at at least three points. Even today, in this age of highly accurate missiles carrying multiple warheads, Russia has some ICBMs equipped with a single twenty or twenty five megaton warhead because of their utility in destroying large cities but India can do the job with multiple warheads of lower yields, thoroughly tested to their full yields, of course. There are various distractions such as terrorism -- I have said almost all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 has been sponsored by the C.I.A. -- K. Subrahmanyam has been the kingpin of all this C.I.A.-sponsored terrorism and separatism in India, not just in Sri Lanka and East Pakistan and in even more serious crimes than terrorism and separatism against India; why doesn’t someone torture him and investigate him? I can provide a lot of evidence, though I know that only the nuclear destruction of New Delhi will do the job -- through RAW and other intelligence agencies in the region using several layers of intermediaries in various religious groups, army officers, corporate houses, politicians and others -- and piracy, which is sea-based terrorism sponsored by the C.I.A. and, like the land-based terrorism, aims to draw India into a U.S.-led war on terrorism and piracy. C.I.A.-RAW are extremely skillful in buying or gaining the confidence of people by various means; to take one example out of hundreds, they have recently silenced a critic of the nuclear deal by getting his book published in the United States (a tactic they used with a Japanese academic, for example, who was shocked by Harvard University’s and the C.I.A.’s “sensational” crimes against an Indian scientist, by having his book published by the Harvard University Press, etc.), having him host Americans for a conference and with RAW feeding him disinformation which he now proudly cites as being from ’intelligence sources’ -- as well as in creating public distractions by terrorist acts, separatist movements, etc., but India has to focus like a laser beam on the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States. ADDED ON NOVEMBER 27, 2008: Objectives of C.I.A.-RAW-Staged Terrorist Attacks In Mumbai : K. Subrahmanyam and C.I.A.-RAW have eliminated the Bombay Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) Chief in their latest terrorist act in Bombay which had more than one objectives but one of which was forestalling an investigation of K. Subrahmanyam -- the king-pin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India including all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 -- which I referred to above in this press release. [Post on Bharat-Rakshak online discussion forum: ] “Times Now reporting US intel officials were present at the Taj at the time of the attack and might have been injured or killed”. It is the Indian equivalent of the U.S. intelligence attack on the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad (see Press Release dated September 22, 2008 below). [Post on Bharat-Rakshak: ] “there was a story on air for just a few minutes and then it was pulled. It talked about a female editor in the Times of India was inside the Taj (Oberoi?) and coordinated the attacks from there. She then reportedly disappeared. her. Anybody has any information? The media is obviously blacking out this news”. As I have said below, the Times of India is RAW’s principal mouthpiece and K. Subrahmanyam has been a “Consulting Editor” there; RAW operatives who act as moderators on Bharat-Rakshak and control the forum locked this thread away and covered up this post. The United States’ FBI and Israel’s commandos must NOT be allowed to operate in India; one of the objectives of this C.I.A.-Mossad-RAW operation is to bring India further into the U.S.-Israel colonial ambit with bases in India, predator strikes, as in Pakistan and the rest. ADDED ON NOVEMBER 29, 2008: The superb job done by India’s commandos and their heroism does nothing about either terrorism or India’s bigger problems: just as the LTTE terrorists and suicide bombers, despite their bravery and heroism -- remember the expression on the face of the severed head of the woman who bent to touch Rajiv Gandhi’s feet as she activated the switch which blew herself, Rajiv Gandhi and many others to bits -- are creations of and puppets in the hands of C.I.A.-RAW, as were the other Tamil groups in Sri Lanka which fought and were eliminated by the LTTE, the extraordinary courage and heroism of the terrorists in the current Mumbai operation -- outnumbered a thousand to one -- is a product of, as they were puppets in the hands of, C.I.A.-RAW. The C.I.A. has the same role in, for example, Shia-Sunni conflicts in Iraq, Pakistan, etc. RAW is a servant and branch of the C.I.A. and the role of the C.I.A. as the perpetrator of the Mumbai terrorism operation and countless other terrorist operations in India since 1983 and of incomparably more injurious operations against India, described below, has no place in the media (which C.I.A.-RAW control), in the public’s consciousness or in India’s plans except in the plans described in this press release and the press releases below -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States -- and India has to focus like a laser beam on these plans. ADDED DECEMBER 1, 2008: According to press reports, a United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) team arrived on Sunday to Mumbai uninvited, ‘brusquely’ (The Telegraph, December 1 ‘08, Internet) told Indian officials they are U.S. government officials and do not need any papers to come and (Indian Express, December 1 ‘08, Internet) “was in a day-long meeting with the Director General of Police, Mumbai Commissioner of Police and senior officials from the Crime Branch…The team is in the process of examining evidence and remnants of explosives gathered from the targeted places and the methodology used by the militants, official sources said … The FBI would be investigating the case from their side as six American nationals were killed in the attacks …”. No matter which country’s nationals are killed in a sovereign country, including the United States, it is that country itself which investigates it. The Director General of Police and other officials being in a day-long meeting with the FBI team amounts to the Indian officials ‘reporting’ to the FBI which has no right to investigate “from their side” or any side. They should have no access to the evidence, “remnants of explosives” or anything. They should not have even been allowed into India. This is a flagrant surrender of India’s sovereignty to an American invasion which must be immediately repelled by whatever means necessary and the Indian government officials punished for high treason. If the Indian armed forces want to show they exist to defend India, now is the time for them to act with force, arrest the invading Americans and punish them as any foreign invaders would be punished. FURTHER ADDED ON DECEMBER 1, 2008: The United States’ sending its Secretary of State, Rice, to India on Wednesday to show “solidarity” with India is exactly like the United States launching a Predator attack on Pakistan, violating its sovereignty, just as the Pakistani president or prime minister was meeting Bush in Washington and another Predator attack on Pakistan while a top U.S. admiral or other high military officer was in Pakistan meeting top Pakistani officials telling them the United States respects Pakistan’s sovereignty: to make Pakistan accept the military attack on its territory and violation of its sovereignty and to bring Pakistan into a colonial relationship with the United States, as during the British rule over India several Indian maharajahs were given 21-gun salutes and treated as nominal ‘sovereigns’ by the British while British ‘Residents’ supervised them, allowing their native puppets to save face. Nothing has changed since then and the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States is meant to change that. According to an Associated Press report, Obama today told reporters at a news conference “The situation in South Asia as a whole and the safe havens for terrorists that have been established there represent the single most important threat against the American people”. This is the language and justification the United States uses for invading and occupying other countries of which the invasion of India by the FBI and other American officials -- news reports said there are sixteen officials from various U.S. agencies -- is the start. ADDED ON DECEMBER 4, 2008: The United States Attorney General says [IANS report in The Hindu, December 4 ‘08, Internet] “FBI agents are working with Indian police to provide assistance and gather evidence … “I can confirm finally that the FBI is over there, that they’re working with the Indian police on gathering evidence” “. As I have said, regardless of who carried out the recent terrorist operation in Mumbai, the C.I.A. is the sponsor of all terrorism in India since 1983 and it does that through several layers of intermediaries. Letting United States officials have any role in the collection or interpretation of evidence preempts identification of the main culprit and allows the main culprit to tamper with the evidence and cover up his role as the perpetrator of the crime. Just as the LTTE carries out its operations as a puppet of C.I.A.-RAW, so do the LeT, etc. Mumbai police may not be able to torture and investigate the C.I.A. Director -- though I can provide plenty of evidence on him -- or the U. S. president -- they will be eaten by their compatriots after India’s nuclear first strike on the United States -- but it can refrain from making the criminal into a sheriff or letting the criminal touch or tamper with the evidence and it can certainly torture and investigate K. Subrahmanyam, for example. The state actor in crimes against India is the United States and the Indian armed forces ought to be arresting its Indian puppets and assisting India’s sovereign (Press Release of August 14, 2008 below) in punishing the criminal United States. FURTHER ADDED ON DECEMBER 4, 2008: The U.S. Attorney General also “insisted that his country has the jurisdiction to prosecute the terrorist captured…” ( PTI, Washington, Dec. 4 ‘08). This by itself requires breaking diplomatic relations with the United States and declaring the United States an enemy country. He is claiming India is a United States colony. This enemy country has also been committing terrorist acts in India since 1983 through its puppets. There is no need to investigate further. ADDED ON DECEMBER 8, 2008: An article (by Kaplan) in the New York Times of December 8, 2008 calls for separating north and central India from the south, treating it as part of the Middle East and for America to be “at all places [of the Middle East, of which India, according to him, is a part] at once … with every bit of energy and constant attention that our national security apparatus -- and those of our allies -- can bring to bear”, including troops, colonising India with invasions and military operations as the United States has colonised the rest of the Middle East. This is the “jurisdiction” over India the Americans are claiming. Each day that goes by without India engaged in a crash program of producing ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States is a precious day lost in a war. ADDED ON DECEMBER 10, 2008: Far from breaking diplomatic relations with the United States and declaring the United States an enemy country, the Indian government, as dictated by C.I.A.-RAW, sent a minister to the U.N. Security Council yesterday to facilitate the United States' exercising jurisdiction over India. Pakistan's ISI functions as a branch of the C.I.A. as does India's RAW. It is first and foremost India's territory -- RAW headquarters on Lodhi Road in New Delhi -- that is used for terrorist acts against India and the destruction of RAW headquarters will end these terrorist acts -- the destruction of ISI will not -- though only temporarily. But the problem is much bigger than terrorism and requires the destruction of much of the rest of New Delhi also and then of the United States. DRDO needs to provide a time table for the nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi should be done as quickly as possible -- and the production of ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States. ADDED ON DECEMBER 12, 2008: I have said (2nd Press Release dated September 1, 2008 below) that willingness to use nuclear weapons is the most important component of national security and prosperity and that this applies as much to the use of nuclear weapons within the country against agents of a foreign power as outside the country. An example of agents of a foreign country in New Delhi is from the Lok Sabha today (PTI report in The Hindu, December 12, 2008, Internet): “Referring to Nobel laureate in economics Paul Krugman, Chidambaram said this was not the year to worry too much about the fiscal gaps. “We have to stimulate the economy”.” In a letter dated August 1, 2001 to the press (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ) I referred to this jew’s attempt to steal my proposal about money. Whatever this jew has said recently about deficits and stimulating the economy is taken without acknowledgment from my proposal about money. I have described below ( see my letters dated February 26, 2005, April 8, 2005 and the article “How India’s Economy can Grow 30% Per Year Or More” in addendum dated July 30, 2008) how a mediocre Indian, Amartya Sen, was given a Nobel Prize as the mediocre “Indian” substitute for me, how he was invited by Clinton to his White House Conference on “The New Economy” which my proposal about money leads to as the “Indian” substitute for me though his work had nothing to do with The New Economy, how a Nobel Prize for this mediocre Indian was arranged via Jethmalani ( see addendum dated July 4, 2005 below) to keep their ferocious crimes against India’s greatest scientist covered up and thus keep India down, how “the Americans have been suppressing my proposal about money, because it is in the economic field what nuclear weapons are in the military field, while they promote inferior Indian niggers such as Subramanian Swamy and Manmohan Singh, both of them traitors on the C.I.A.’s payroll” (addendum of August 4 to December 6, 2007, below). In the latest such act, Indian government traitors “gifted USD 4.5 million to the Harvard University to establish a Fund in the honour of Nobel laureate Amartya Sen … Indian Ambassador Ronen Sen … signed an agreement … at a ceremony at the University on Wednesday in the presence of the noted economist Amartya Sen” (PTI report in The Hindu, December 11, 2008); see also my Press Release dated September 20, 2008 below. In creating a time table, DRDO should assume that finances will not be a constraint; in fact, the more money is spent on producing the ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States -- ten times, twenty times or more the amount of the entire current defence budget -- the more the economy as a whole will also benefit. ADDED ON DECEMBER 14, 2008: The Captured Mumbai Terrorist Deserves India’s Highest Civilian & Military Awards The ten terrorists in Mumbai killed India's enemies -- Americans (see second addendum dated December 4, 2008 above), British, Israelis and their Indian collaborators -- at great personal sacrifice and deserve India's highest civilian award, Bharat Ratna. They also showed extra-ordinary courage and heroism -- outnumbered a thousand to one -- and deserve India's highest military award for valor -- Param Vir Chakra. They are all sons of India’s soil, partitioned by India’s enemies to make Indians fight Indians (see what is said below about the role of the Intelligence Bureau which, like Nehru, remained loyal to the British after 1947, in the riots that accompanied the partition, killing and displacing millions and the same role played now by RAW and the present-day American-appointed ‘rulers‘ of India, not just in separatism and terrorism in the streets but in C.I.A.-RAW-staged Kargil war, to keep Vajpayee prime minister and other such conflicts). The traitors in New Delhi, in and outside government, deserve death (see the rest of this press release and the press releases/ statements to the press, starting from the one dated January 5, 2004, below). See the account below of a lone Englishman arresting India’s emperor and the terrorization and subjugation inflicted on Indians by the British, killing over ten million Indians in just the ten years after 1857 and the incomparably greater terrorization and subjugation being inflicted on them now by the Americans. ADDED ON DECEMBER 16, 2008: According to a report (Times of India, December 16, 2008, Internet) India’s worse-than-worthless military is “hard pressed to provide officers for four NSG hubs”; that is, hard pressed to provide more collaborators for India’s enemies. It has enough officers and men to arrest all employees of RAW which, as a branch of the C.I.A. against India, has a central role as the perpetrator of all terrorist acts against India. But it will take the nuclear destruction of New Delhi for India’s worse-than-worthless military to stop obeying the traitor politicians and civil servants and start obeying India’s sovereign. ADDED ON DECEMBER 18, 2008: A headline (Times of India, December 18, 2008, Internet) says “Dawood directly involved in Mumbai attack: Russia intelligence”. Regardless of whether it is so, the Russian intelligence agency has said this at the request of the C.I.A. because whereas Indians are, for the moment, alert to Anglo-American-Israeli attempts to make Indians fight Indians, they are less likely to suspect Russian motives. But a fundamental distinction needs to be made between Russian intelligence agencies and Russia. "In 1996, Robert Trumbull Crowley, former Assistant Deputy Director of Clandestine Operations of the CIA, gave documents of his own top secret operations to his friend, historian Gregory Douglas" ( http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg103806.html ) and described in detail (a transcript is at http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8966 ) how the C.I.A. has done “business” with Russian intelligence agencies for many decades, how the C.I.A. directly arranged the plane crash which killed Homi Bhabha but relied on Russian intelligence agencies, with which it did “business”, to assassinate Shastri who had given a go ahead for an Indian nuclear weapons program. The Russian intelligence agencies -- large parts of which were brought on the C.I.A.’s payroll -- brought down the Soviet Union. After a letter of mine in Indian Express in the early nineties which appeared under the heading “Grab This Opportunity” regarding a Russian proposal to form a Russia-China-India alliance, P. V. Narasimha Rao sent the head of India’s submarine-launched ballistic missile program to Russia to get help, where he died as Shastri did. When, in a letter to the press, I pointed out that this was the “help” the Russians had provided and expressed dismay at Indian officials entertaining the thought that any other country will give them help to build submarine-launched ballistic missiles (I wrote it showed they “have no appreciation of the real world, do not belong in the major league and should not seek a permanent seat on the Security Council… Thankfully, they are not the real leadership of India, though only India‘s enemies seem to know that“; in case it is still not clear to the stupid Indians, India‘s leadership is where the Americans have been spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year on 24-hour satellite surveillance and ’neutralisation’ of the greatest living Indian for over 31 years), the Indian government woke up, briefly, and the Russians hastily withdrew a delegation visiting India for fear of retaliation. Just as RAW sits at C.I.A.- supplied terminals to participate in crimes against India’s greatest scientist, the C.I.A. provided similar terminals to the Russian intelligence agencies after I started writing, sometimes critically, about Putin and the Russian government (see below). A report a couple days ago (The Hindu, December 16, 2008, Internet) said “Russia may lease out to India “several” nuclear-powered attack submarines, but has no such plans for China … because it “never asked for them” … “It is a question of trust, which exists between Russia and India, but is in deficit between Russia and China” …”. Well, it is just that the Chinese are more intelligent; the Russians can trust Indians to be stupid but not the Chinese. It will be the easiest thing in the world for Russian intelligence agencies to install devices in these submarines with which they can track them and, in keeping with their “business” relationship with U.S. intelligence agencies, enable the Americans to track them, too. I have said there should be an iron-clad rule against importing ANY defence equipment ( in the addendums dated March 23, 2008 and February 26, 2006 below, I have also described the perils of importing electronic equipment because of which Pakistan scrambled its fighter jets when Indian jets entered just 1-3 miles inside its air space a few days ago but is helpless against twice weekly lethal missile strikes on its territory by American drones) but considering how all Indians -- politicians, the media, etc., not just RAW -- are participating in crimes against India’s greatest scientist, this rule will only be enforced after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Even more fundamental in all this is Indians’ determination to be ruled by white-skinned people -- because of which they have made a firangi piece of dog-faeces their empress -- and that will require firangi-watchers and firangi-hunters, as I have described below and the extermination of the firangis, which will also be done after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ADDED ON DECEMBER 20, 2008: The cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian by India’s media (these press releases are sent to hundreds of India’s media organs) is the key to all of India’s problems. If India’s patriots, such as those who recently killed India’s enemies in Mumbai, would like to be effective, they should focus their operations on media organs such as the newspaper offices on Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg in Delhi and the radio and television offices and make the punishment meted out to them specifically contingent on their cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian. The destruction of the newspaper and other media offices can be done by conventional means. ADDED ON DECEMBER 22, 2008: The following are three posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- Post #1: When recently Indian jets crossed into Pakistani air space just 1-3 miles, Pakistan scrambled its fighter jets. Why can't it intercept and shoot down the American Predator drones which make twice weekly lethal missile strikes on its territory? Just a few days ago, all parties in Pakistan's parliament had passed a resolution that Pakistan will not allow such violations of its sovereignty and will defend its territory (it was directed against American attacks on its territory; there were no Indian violations then).The recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai were instigated by the United States through intermediaries it controls in the region to provoke military tension between Pakistan and India so that it can then more extensively and flagrantly conduct attacks, including ground invasions, on Pakistan while the Indians, stupidly, keep quiet or even support them. The idea is to establish a full-fledged overtly colonial relationship with first Pakistan and then the rest of the subcontinent, very much like the direct colonial rule Britain exercised and which the United States has established over Iraq and Afghanistan through puppet governments. The Predator attacks are the beginning of this campaign. Post # 2: Don't make such stupid, personally insulting comments. Indians are lackeys of the Americans and cannot tolerate any accusation against them. It is all part of submission to the white man. A handful of the British, from half way around the world, had ruled India for centuries, because of stupid people like you. If you see the thread on RAW in the Indian defence section, you will see how even today India's main intelligence agency is an instrument of American rule over India. RAW has many operatives on such forums to abuse and insult anyone who points an accusing finger at the United States. Don't do that; I will crush you like a cockroach. Post # 3: India-Pakistan conflicts of today are no different from the Hindu-Muslim rioting that accompanied the partition in 1947 and was instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. The only change is that the United States has taken the place of Britain. RAW, which was split off from the Intelligence Bureau, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and something similar is the case with the other intelligence agencies of the region. They are used for terrorist acts in the Subcontinent by the C.I.A. for various purposes, just as the Kargil war was staged by C.I.A.-RAW, with the help of Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled army chief (Musharraf), to help Vajpayee win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence and thus help him remain prime minister; Vajpayee used to be an informant for the British before Independence and has been a C.I.A. agent since the United States replaced Britain as the imperial power over the subcontinent and he is far from being the only politician who has been a C.I.A. agent. Nehru was a life-long British agent, as he admitted to American ambassador Galbraith and his descendents (Indira, Rajiv) have been C.I.A. agents, though they also had a relationship with the KGB because Indira became prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri in Tashkent at the C.I.A.'s request. A C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak forum a few months ago was asking that India acquiesce in the American invasion and occupation of Pakistan and later of India. He said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started) and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative; Musharraf was not the only C.I.A. agent in the military. So it all boils down to continued white rule over India and Pakistan after 1947; it is just that the control of these countries has been transferred to covert agencies and they are nominally independent. The United States now wants to overtly occupy and rule the subcontinent, starting with Pakistan. The natives are willing to fight other non-white people like tigers, but behave like obedient dogs to the white master. RAW actively works to make overt American rule over India happen and India's so-called ruling class -- actually, puppet class -- is only too happy at the prospect because it felt orphaned when the British left India. ADDED ON DECEMBER 25, 2008: The following is another post I made, today, on Pakistan Defence Forum:- Post # 4 This is a quote from a post that appeared on Bharat Rakshak forum today:- -----Start Quote --------------------------------"From my post in Khyber Durra it appears that Pakistani nukes were confiscated (and all centrifuge and reprocessing plants frozen) by USA after 9/11 as punishment for ISI payment of money and logistics to Mohd Atta (PBUH) and his 19 heroes of 9-11 fame; surrender of Pakistani Nukes was one of the demands in the non-negotiable list of demands that was given to Gen. Musharraf when "You Are With Us or Against Us" seduction poetry read by GW Bush to join GOAT or be blown to stone age. When full nuclear stock was audited by USA it appears that Pakistan managed to slip and hide between 1-4 nukes. The understanding with USA was that this GUBO in private should not be made public, else the military will be overthrown (yes military nor Govt). And the Indians should remain convinced that their nukes remain potent (sic). But Yindus being Chankian got the wind (even our own N^3 figured it out) and established that the Hawa Mahal of Pakistani nuke is well .... Hawa Mahal onleeee. ( I heard the same from a senior afsar of Bhartiya Naabhikeeya Kaman).It is believed that one of the slipped nuke has crossed into US borders and all US agencies have been running like headless chicken since then (2003) trying to locate the nuke.Of the balance 1-3 nukes that could still be in the hands of TSP Army and stateless irregulars, the form factor does not allow mounting atop missile (again Unkill has reign of the missile launch key), so they can only be delivered to India via JDAM (Jihadi Delivered Ammunition) or aircraft. Both routes have high attrition rate and it is likely that at most likely only one of the 3 may explode in an Indian city. OTOH if they have only 1 left in some hidden caves in Northern Areas (Occupied Kashmir) the chances of it making across to Indian border is well .. . . very slim."-----End Quote ------------------------------------------If the above is true -- that the United States has control of almost all of Pakistan's nuclear warheads -- that would explain why Pakistan is not shooting down American drones. But since the threat from the drones is to the entire subcontinent, not just Pakistan, India ought to be helping to shoot them down, openly, though the real task is militarily ejecting the United States from Afghanistan which should also be India's and Pakistan's joint concern and is easier than might appear (the United States will not risk losing its largest cities to India's nuclear bombs for the sake of remaining in Afghanistan, besides the overwhelming advantage India & Pakistan will have against the United States and its NATO allies in operations with conventional weapons in Afghanistan).Another point that needs to be made is the capacity of countries like India and Pakistan, with a low degree of urbanisation, to survive a full-fledged nuclear war against a country such as the United States which has a high degree of urbanisation. If both India and the United States launch 5,000 nuclear warheads at each other, targeting the 4,000 largest population centers in the other country (let us assume for simplicity that anti-missile systems are not a significant factor with such a large number of warheads, though, in fact, I have predicted India's anti-missile systems will be far more effective than the United States'), what percentage of India's population will be in its 4,000 largest population centers as compared to the percentage of the United States' population that will be in its 4,000 largest population centers? The fact of the matter is that even if 60% or 90% or 95% of India's population perishes in a full-scale nuclear war with the United States, the remaining population -- say 50 million -- will equal India's population in its classical period and India will survive, with a life-style comparable to that in its classical period. On the other hand, the United States cannot survive the destruction of its 4,000 largest population centers because of the high degree of urbanisation, technology intensive life-styles and other cultural factors. To put it another way, if India loses ALL its electricity permanently, it will survive; the United States cannot. I am predicting that the population of the United States that survives being killed immediately by the nuclear explosions will survive for a limited time period by people eating one another till no one remains alive. ADDED ON DECEMBER 26, 2008: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- Post # 5 There is an easy way countries like Pakistan and India can keep their nuclear strength credible: keep testing and expanding their nuclear arsenals. There is absolutely no reason why these countries should limit themselves to half a dozen tests while a country like the United States has conducted well over a thousand -- except the habit of behaving like obedient dogs to the White Master. If Pakistan would like to show the world -- and it should -- that it still has control of its nuclear arsenal and it is in good working order, it should conduct a couple of nuclear tests now. Both India and Pakistan should continue improving and expanding their nuclear arsenals and testing the new designs periodically. The firangi is the enemy which has to be destroyed; there is no need to keep yourself weak because the firangi enemy tells you to. When I say Pakistan should conduct a couple of nuclear tests now, that does not mean that India will mount a conventional attack on it if it does not. There is no question of India attacking Pakistan. Pakistan needs to show independence from the United States and conducting a couple of nuclear tests in, say, a month from now will be a good way to do it. If it is true that the United States has taken control of its centrifuges, etc., it should start working on building new ones.Beyond that, of course, is the joint responsibility of India and Pakistan to eject the United States from Afghanistan and that is what they should focus on and that also requires further nuclear tests. ADDED ON DECEMBER 28, 2008: DRDO should determine as quickly as possible an island where thermonuclear weapons can be tested to their full yields and start designing, building and testing thermonuclear weapons, since the head of the Department of Atomic Energy has been bought by the Americans. DRDO should set up whatever facilities are needed to design and produce nuclear weapons independently of the Department of Atomic Energy. The first test should be conducted as quickly as possible, taking a nuclear weapon, of whatever type, from the existing stockpile if necessary, in a matter of weeks and no more than a couple of months. An objective of this test will be to blow the traitor deal, known as the nuclear deal, to bits in defence of India. This test can be conducted on an island or in Pokhran, depending on the type and yield of the nuclear weapon, or in New Delhi itself. The best test would be a nuclear weapon mounted on top of a missile in flight and exploded over the island as it would be in use in war, but an underground test will also be fine. Conducting such an above ground test will itself constitute renouncing the Partial Test Ban Treaty; there is no need to make any reference to the traitors of the Ministry of External Affairs who will be blown to bits anyway, along with many other traitors, if the test is conducted in New Delhi itself. If the media continue the cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian, it will be necessary to conduct the first test in New Delhi itself. ADDED ON DECEMBER 30, 2008: In designing nuclear weapons for use against the United States, radioactive materials should be identified that can be dispersed over the territory of the United States, either via separate radiological weapons (“dirty bombs”) or as part of the regular thermonuclear weapons, that will so contaminate the territory of the United States with radioactivity that nothing will grow there for at least several years that can be consumed without getting a lethal dose of radiation. This will force the Americans who survive the nuclear bomb explosions on the four thousand largest population centers to eat one another till no one remains alive. The ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with such radioactivity can be done in a separate operation -- such as by unmanned aerial vehicles -- after its four thousand largest population centers have been destroyed by regular thermonuclear weapons. This requires that India be the dominant power after the initial exchange of, say, five thousand nuclear weapons between India and the United States. India has the leadership required for this but the cover up of the news and views of the leadership has to be lifted. Lifting this cover up is the first stage of India’s war for survival. As this cover up is lifted, many politicians, media people and, above all, RAW bosses such as the kingpin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India for decades, K. Subrahmanyam, will try to flee to the United States and those who succeed will share the fate of Americans. Once the cover up of the news about the greatest living Indian is lifted, the genocidal intent and behaviour of the United States toward India will be clear. He has been writing about it for three decades. The grip of the United States on India through C.I.A.-RAW can be broken only temporarily by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Exterminating the population of the United States is essential for India to survive. ADDED ON DECEMBER 31, 2008: If the armed forces would like to make themselves useful to India rather than to India’s enemies, they should force the lifting of the media cover up of the news and views of the greatest living Indian and India’s real leadership at the points of bayonets. If the armed forces fail to do so within four days, DRDO should proceed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ADDED ON JANUARY 1, 2009: It is highly unlikely that India’s armed forces will act as above. DRDO should proceed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi without waiting. The following are posts on Pakistan Defence Forum:- My post: In letters to the press several years ago, I showed how radiological weapons (weapons that spread radioactive material over large areas, instead of producing heat and blast) can give even the smallest country military power comparable to that of a superpower. Just half a dozen two-inch mortars, operated by the country's special forces, can cover a city the size of London with radioactive material in a matter of minutes forcing the city's evacuation. Pakistan could give an ultimatum demanding the immediate stoppage of the Predator attacks on its territory and withdrawal of all NATO forces from Afghanistan in, say, three weeks under pain of such forced evacuation of London. To be effective, the operation should be carried out over London before the ultimatum and the ultimatum should demand withdrawal from Afghanistan on pain of similar forced evacuations of other Western cities of comparable size.After World War II, the United States had considered having its nuclear arsenal consist almost entirely of radiological weapons. It decided in favour of fission and fusion bombs but that does not mean that countries that cannot easily produce fission and fusion bombs should not go for radiological weapons. They are much more usable and more effective in many ways. Post by Niazi9: Reapers are expensive puppies. We knock couple of them down or have our proxies do so and the US will perk up. Problem is that we've already gamed the scenario and realized it would be net loss for us given that the targets are against us as well. It boils my blood hearing any talk about them being our friends. Just tell that to hundreds of our brave soldiers who have died at the hands of these tribal asswipes. At the end of the day, these people are against the Pakistani nation state and I and one imagines our forces aren't losing sleep over their losses. My post: As I have said at the very start of this thread, the drone attacks are the beginning of a campaign to occupy and dismember Pakistan and then the rest of the subcontinent. The United States creates whatever excuses it finds handy for such purposes. What is at stake is the very survival, not just of Pakistan but of the other countries of the subcontinent as well. My post: Both India's and Pakistan's armies are parts of the British Indian army. All units, regiments, etc. of India's army have retained the identities they had during British colonial rule and regularly celebrate the anniversaries of their founding by the British, some of them more than 250 years ago. I believe the same is the case with Pakistan's army. MILLIONS of Indians, both Hindu and Muslim, fought under the British in both World War I and World War II and not a single one of them fought the British on behalf of their mother land, except for the prisoners of war taken by the Japanese from the Indian army which were formed into the Azad Hind Fauj by Subhash Chandra Bose. This history of loyalty to whites -- the only change is that the Americans have replaced the British -- has some thing to do with the fact that Pakistan's armed forces do not even try to shoot down American drones. Close relatives -- sons, etc. -- of practically all senior officers of both India's and Pakistan's armed forces live and work in the United States and I have found, in the case of Indians, that their loyalties are with the White Master; I believe the same is the case with officers of Pakistan's armed forces. An example of this seems to be the gentleman named Niazi who posted above. I have only come across this name once -- Lt. General Niazi who commanded Pakistan's forces in East Pakistan and surrendered to India's Lt. Gen. Jagjit Singh Arora in 1971. Lt. Gen. Niazi was in the British Indian army and won a Military Cross for valor fighting for the British. On looking at the other posts of Mr. Niazi, it seems he is indeed a nephew of Lt. Gen. Niazi and himself lives in the United States. His post above shows a degree of identification with the American drone attackers. He refers to the drones being "expensive" and says the Americans will "perk up" if you shoot them down. His 'blood boils' not at those who are attacking Pakistani territory but at the Pakistani victims of the drone attacks. I don't mean to make an ad hominem argument with respect to Mr. Niazi but only referred to him as an example of the reason why Pakistan remains undefended against the Americans -- the reason being that both India's and Pakistan's armies are more loyal to their white colonial masters -- past and future -- than to their own people, though this problem of loyalty to white foreigners exists in the civilian population as well. There are millions of Indians living in the United States, from civilian and military families in India and most of them are just as loyal to the Americans as Mr. Niazi is and hate any patriotism for India as Mr. Niazi does for Pakistan and the same is true of their family members in India. I have no reason to believe things are very different for Pakistanis. India similarly remains undefended against the United States. Contrast the behavior of Indians and Pakistanis with that of Iraqis; the Iraqi citizens' militias, during the second invasion of Iraq in 2003, charged American tanks in cars and SUVs and were cut down by the TENS OF THOUSANDS without the Americans suffering a single casualty. No amount of advanced weaponry will be of use if there is no desire to defend your country against whites. The Americans are depending upon this characteristic of Indians and Pakistanis in their plans to occupy and re-colonise the subcontinent. I have said in post # 1 above that the recent terror attacks in Mumbai were meant to facilitate these plans. The U.S. government does not keep its sponsorship of terrorism in the subcontinent a secret. Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India." ( http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/11/17/pakistan-the-next-us-target ). The same is the case with terrorism in India. The United States' sponsorship of terrorism is the least of what it does. I have written about its suppression of India's research and development and its spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year on 24-hour satellite surveillance and crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian for over 31 years. In Pakistan there are movements -- Jihadi movements, Madarasa-educated youngsters, etc. -- which do motivate many Pakistanis to fight white aggressors. So there is hope for Pakistan. In India, however, even such movements are lacking. Perhaps I am being unfair to senior Pakistani military officers. Just before the second Gulf War, there was a report of an Egyptian dignitary visiting Pakistan saying that Pakistan and Egypt will act together to save the Islamic Ummah, apparently the plan being for Egyptian planes to deliver Pakistani nuclear weapons to European capitals, if necessary. But the Americans came to know of the plan and it had to be aborted. It is more likely that I am being too generous to Pakistani military officers, considering they would not even defend Pakistan's own territory against the United States. Exactly the same is the case with Indians; Indians both in and outside government eagerly participate in the United States' crimes against India and their blood boils at any one who disturbs this master-slave arrangement. India's only hope is in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ADDED ON JANUARY 3, 2009: The United States will be taken care of by the ten thousand nuclear warheads and their means of delivery India will have. All that the armed forces can do is take care of the traitor politicians and civil servants or just the media cover up referred to above with their bayonets and they can still do it, if they move fast, before DRDO does it with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- “In India's army, the officers and men identify with and take pride in their regiments and regimental history and their regimental history invariably goes back to the British officers who founded or commanded the regiment and their exploits. This way they feel they are one with the British and the power and military successes of the British victors is also theirs and they do not have to feel they are like the inferior native rulers' armies the British so thoroughly routed. This feeling of being in the same army with the British is central to their morale and their ability to fight well and they cling to it because otherwise they will be like all the other inferior Indians who lost and were routed and will have no morale to speak of.The Indian Civil Service (ICS), with which the British ruled India, was renamed Indian Administrative Service (IAS) after India's so-called 'Independence' and the IAS has often been called the "steel frame" which holds India together, because the IAS also have their loyalties rooted in their history as the British rulers of India with a few Indians mixed in. The present day members of the IAS still see themselves as agents of whites (with the Americans having replaced the British) ruling India. Their connection to present day white countries is live and continuing and they continue to receive instructions/orders, as well as money, from their white masters through RAW whereas in the army, the connection with the British is only through old faded photographs and trophies and tales of battles and campaigns.The armed forces can transfer their pride and loyalties to indigenous India from British colonial India if the indigenous India is seen as headed toward military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- over the strongest white country and this can become the anchor of their morale. Since their connection to the British is through old faded photographs and trophies, they are not so bound to the current imperial power, the United States, as the civil servants are.Insofar as Pakistan's army has maintained the same regimental system, the above explains why they have difficulty shooting down American drones; it can be termed broadly a problem of morale. Military entities without a British history or present or recent American connections should have no problems of morale, just equipment. (Note that Mr. Niazi above referred to having "our proxies" shoot them down; why should he even think of having proxies defend the country rather than the armed forces themselves?).” ADDED ON JANUARY 5, 2009: The following are three posts I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- My post The question is -- when it comes to the white man, are Pakistanis any less slavish than Indians are?According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, the Americans are now providing live video feeds from the drones to Pakistani army officers and making them participants in the drone attacks. The Americans got the idea from what I wrote above, that a feeling of being in the same army as the British is central to the morale of Indian army officers and men and their ability to fight well, that both Indian and Pakistani armies are more loyal to their white colonial masters -- past and future -- than to their own people, that the Indians are all too happy at the prospect of the occupation and recolonisation of the subcontinent by the Americans because they had felt orphaned when the British left India.The slavish behaviour and loyalty toward the white man exists because the native armies were thoroughly routed by the British. They were routed because of the technological advantage the British had. The use of drones by the Americans -- with operators sitting in Nevada pushing the buttons to launch missiles on Pakistan -- shows that the technological gap has only widened, not narrowed, in the hundreds of years that have passed since the British routed the natives. And the natives make no serious attempt to close the gap. Whatever technology they have is taken from the white master and they are quite happy to continue this way.The latest example of this is India signing a multibillion dollar deal with Boeing for eight maritime reconnaissance aircraft instead of pumping the money into indigenous research and development. My post India gets about 70% of its defence equipment from Russia. In the early 1990s, Yevgeny Primakov, who used to be Foreign Minister and, before that, KGB chief, suggested a Russia, China, India alliance. I applauded that in a letter to the press which the Indian Express published under the heading "Grab This Opportunity". Upon that, the then Indian prime minister sent the head of India's submarine-launched ballistic missile program to Russia to get help, where he died. When I pointed out in a letter to the press that this was the "help" the Russians had provided, the Indian government briefly woke up, but only briefly. The Indian press recently reported that Russia had offered several nuclear-powered attack submarines to India but not to China because there is a lot of "trust" between Russia and India but not between Russia and China. I pointed out that it will be the easiest thing in the world for the Russians to install devices in them that will enable them to track them and -- in keeping with the "business" relationship between Russian and American intelligence agencies going back many decades, which a former senior C.I.A. official has described, under which the KGB assassinated visiting Indian prime minister Shastri, during his Tashkent meeting with Pakistan's Ayub, at the C.I.A.'s request because he had given a go ahead to India's nuclear weapons program -- enable the Americans to track them, too. Indians continue their dependence on the Russians as Pakistan does on America and a C.I.A. specialist on the subcontinent a few months ago said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started), that its nuclear weapons are totally under U.S. control and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative in all this. But soon both India and Pakistan may be American colonies. A Russian intelligence agent has started a thread to make Pakistanis start thinking of starting to buy defence equipment from Russia because the Indians may stop buying from them after what I wrote about the nuclear submarines. But there is no solution except indigenous research and development. My post Following my post # 44 above, a news report says Pakistan's army chief, Gen. Kayani, has demanded that U.S. drone attacks on Pakistan cease immediately as they are counterproductive in the war against extremism and terrorism. But in post #39 above I poined out that the U.S. government itself acknowledges that it is sponsoring extremism and terrorism in Pakistan through India's RAW:-"Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India."( http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/11/17/pakistan-the-next-us-target )."Following this post, the U.S. vice-president-elect, who was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to which the above testimony was made, came to Pakistan with $15 billion in aid. And India's government i) sent letters to governments worldwide not to give financial assistance to Pakistan and ii) gave a dossier of evidence to Pakistan's ambassador (also to U.S., UK, and China's ambassadors) about the Mumbai terror attacks and asked Pakistan to investigate further (earlier it was asking Pakistan not to investigate but to ACT against the guilty individuals and organisations the U.S. and India had named). As I have been saying for a long time, the guilty parties are the C.I.A. and India's RAW and other intermediaries, in India, Pakistan and other countries, that the C.I.A. uses. The C.I.A. is the epicenter of worldwide terrorism and India's RAW is its most important instrument for terrorist acts (as well as a lot of other crimes) against India. But NO ONE is talking about C.I.A.-RAW being the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attacks or hundreds of other such acts against India -- not India's government, not India's Opposition parties, not Pakistan's government, not any country's media. Now Gen. Kayani is still talking of the drone attacks being “counterproductive" in the "war against extremism and terrorism" and India's defence minister met India's service chiefs on Monday, according to press reports and asked for "presentations" on the security situation. They all know the United States' crimes against India and Pakistan and they are all participating in them. The Indian participants in these crimes will be taken care of by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi; the United States will be taken care of by the ten thousand nuclear warheads and their means of delivery to the continental United States that will follow. 　 ADDED ON JANUARY 6, 2009: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum: India is asking Pakistan to accept that the captured Mumbai terrorist is a Pakistani national. Many terrorists are from what India calls Pakistan-Occupid Kashmir (P.O.K.) and Pakistan calls Azad Kashmir. Since P.O.K., according to India, is an integral part of India, like the rest of Kashmir, anyone born and raised in P.O.K., according to Indian law, is from India. That means that any terrorist born and raised in P.O.K., from the point of view of Indian law, is an Indian citizen. Also, any terrorist training camps that may exist in P.O.K. are on Indian soil, according to Indian law. If they are being used to launch terrorist attacks on India, those attacks are being launched from Indian soil, from the point of view of Indian law. But I have said all the Mumbai terrorists are sons of India, partitioned by India’s enemies to make Indians fight Indians, that an attack by the firangis on Pakistan is an attack on India and occupation of Afghanistan by the firangis is occupation of India. India’s partition was accepted by Nehru who was a life-long British agent as he admitted to U.S. ambassador Galbraith and he became India’s first prime minister and, thus, India’s partition had no legal validity as India’s current traitor government has no legal standing. British rule over India, both before and after 1857, was by an occupying power. Any Indians who fought with the British against India’s emperor in 1857 were insurgents. ADDED ON JANUARY 7, 2009: Pakistan does not shoot down American drones because Pakistan is a creation of the firangis, an insurgency within India to serve the firangis’ purposes. Whereas the firangi-controlled insurgency that is Pakistan is overt, RAW is an instrument of the firangis within India that functions covertly. Both these instruments of the firangis engage in terrorism and warfare against India but RAW, through which the firangis control and operate India’s traitor-puppet government as well as media, does a lot more -- such as suppressing and sabotaging India’s defence research and development and participating in the firangis’ crimes against the greatest living Indian -- and is, by far, the more powerful and effective instrument in the firangis’ hands. The firangis and RAW try to keep India occupied with fighting Pakistan and divert attention from the real enemy -- the firangis -- and any mention of RAW as the firangis’ instrument against India is suppressed. Taking care of RAW and the traitor-puppet government by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States by means of ten thousand nuclear warheads will take care of India’s problems. ADDED ON JANUARY 8, 2009: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- “I have cited testimony by a U.S. official before a committee of the U.S. Congress (the Senate Foreign Relations Committee) in which he acknowledged United States' sponsorship of extremist and terrorist groups in Pakistan :"Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India." (http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/...next-us-target )."The testimony in post # 1 of this thread before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security about the FBI's 'investigation' of the Mumbai attacks, pretending the U.S. does not know of its sponsorship of those and hundreds of other attacks, was staged to try to cover up and divert attention from that acknowledgment before the other U.S. Senate committee of U.S. sponsorship of extremism and terrorism in Pakistan. The U.S. vice-president-elect, Biden, was the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee before which the above testimony, containing the acknowledgment, was given. His "fact-finding" trip to the subcontinent is similarly meant to try to get 'deniability' as to his participation in these crimes . "Fact-finding" my foot! All these criminal Americans know exactly what they have been doing in the subcontinent.As I have said in another thread (titled "Why Can't Pakistan Shoot Down U.S. Drones?") on this board, the mumbai attacks were carried out by the C.I.A., through intermediaries such as RAW and similar entities in Pakistan, of course, to provoke military tension/conflict between India and Pakistan so that the U.S. will have an opportunity to greatly expand its attacks on Pakistan, at present mostly limited to drone attacks, which are the start of a U.S. campaign to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent.Not only has the United States no right to investigate a crime committed in India and should have no access to any evidence, etc., letting it take the position it is taking is making the criminal into a sheriff.Failing to see what the Americans are up to and treating the criminal as a sheriff on the part of Indians (of course, RAW and many other Indians know about and participate in the Americans' crimes) is due to American propaganda which Indian media carry and the suppression of the news of the crimes of the Americans and their Indian lackeys against the greatest living Indian which are documented and clear as day light. Focusing on these crimes will expose all the other crimes of the United States. But the United States controls the media through RAW.” When Biden comes to India, he should be arrested by Mumbai police for participating in crimes of terrorism against India. ADDED JANUARY 11, 2009: I have been waiting for news of Biden being arrested in India. But he has apparently decided to avoid arrest by skipping India. India must demand his extradition to face trial in India for participating in crimes of terrorism against India. India must also demand extradition of Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, who, without a question, is a participant in these crimes, as well as the C.I.A. Director. FURTHER ADDED ON JANUARY 11, 2009: The Americans had invaded Panama and brought its head of state, Manuel Noriega, to the United States in chains and he remains in jail in the U.S. for engaging in drug trade. Two decades ago, in a telephone conversation with Mrs. Imelda Marcos, whose husband, the Philippine president, was facing trial in the U.S., I said something close to the following "These (the Americans) are the worst criminals on the face of the Earth. They are Europeans who have usurped the land of other people and committed genocide on them. Each time we buy any thing (in the U.S.), we pay taxes that are being used to commit crimes all over the world by the C.I.A. We have the right to arrest President Reagan and the entire American government and try them under Indian law. It is not the law, the problem is enforcement -- who has got the guns. There is an American saying 'If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns'. These (the Americans) are the biggest outlaws in the world and they have got the guns -- nuclear weapons. And they would like to keep it that way.”That is also why nuclear supremacy over the United States, which I have been advocating, is essential for India. The outlaw nature of the United States is most clearly seen in its crimes against the greatest living Indian which are also genocidal crimes against India. Lifting the cover up of these crimes is necessary to see the true nature of the United States. Just as Indians are keeping quiet about the acknowledgment before the U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee of the United States’ sponsorship of extremist and terrorist groups in Pakistan, they have been keeping quiet about the crimes against the greatest living Indian and doing all they can to cover them up. This cover up must be lifted to see the true nature of the United States and what India needs to do to survive. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi is necessary to lift this cover up. ADDED ON JANUARY 13, 2009: India’s Home Minister says “all diplomatic, business, transport and tourist links between the two countries would be cut off if Islamabad fails to act against terror groups responsible for the 26/11 terror strikes” (Times of India, January 13, 2009, Internet). But the sponsor of those strikes and hundreds of other such acts and vastly more serious genocidal crimes against India is the United States. All diplomatic, business, transport and tourist links between India and the United States should be cut off before the United States is destroyed with India’s nuclear weapons. Doing so will require the nuclear destruction of New Delhi first. ADDED ON JANUARY 15, 2009: Biden may have skipped India but the FBI and the C.I.A. are expanding and consolidating their presence and the U.S. ambassador says they will continue into the indefinite future to detect and thwart any future terrorist threats, thus bringing India into a direct U.S. colonial grip as tight as the British had. Taking a witness in the Mumbai case to the U.S. for interrogation was to establish U.S. colonial jurisdiction over India. The United States has bought India’s army chief who is now rejecting various indigenously developed weapon systems, wants Indian troops to go to Afghanistan to support the Americans and calls terrorism the biggest and only threat to India. He will die in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi which should proceed without delay. ADDED ON JANUARY 23, 2009: Like Biden, Obama is NOT welcome to India, despite India’s traitor-puppet prime minister sending him a letter inviting him. Obama is the president of an enemy country. India’s media, controlled by C.I.A.-RAW, have been full of stories about Obama, treating him like the ruler of India and not a single story about the greatest living Indian and America’s crimes against him and against India. The media mould and shape the people’s minds and behaviour and they have been working to bring Indians deeper and deeper into slavery. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will bring the regime change needed to change this and enable India to destroy the enemy country. This is urgently needed. The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- January 11, 2009: For country A to deter country B with its nuclear weapons, country A has to be able to deliver its nuclear weapons to country B. Everyone knows Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to India. But the country that is currently carrying out twice weekly attacks on Pakistan's territory is the United States. How can Pakistan deter the United States? Even without Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), it is not difficult to think of ways Pakistan could deliver half a dozen nuclear weapons to the United States' coastal cities such as New York and Washington. This thread is meant to explore ways in which Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, the knowledge of which would deter the United States. January 14, 2009: Any one who has an 'understanding' with a foreign power for attacks on his own country's territory is a slave. As I have said in another thread, both India and Pakistan are such slaves of the white man. I have said that the drone attacks are the start of a campaign by the United States to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent. Therefore India has to worry about the drone attacks as much as Pakistan and India has as much responsibility to stop them as does Pakistan. Since the attacker is a nuclear power, stopping the drone attacks has to include the possible use of nuclear weapons. "Why do we need to deliver nuclear weapons to the US?" Because the United States is attacking your territory and it is a nuclear power. Since the drone attacks are as much a threat to India as they are to Pakistan, India will have to stop them if Pakistan will not. Most Pakistanis would understand this. RAW has some operatives on this forum with Pakistani identities. Since RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (and Pakistan), it tries to stop any discussion of how these countries could defend themselves against the United States. I don't know if you are one of those but post # 2 in this thread is by a RAW operative who registered after I started this thread and then posted something to try to stop any discussion of how Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States the knowledge of which will deter the United States from attacking Pakistan. Only someone who thinks that the white master has the right to do any thing he wants to his Indian and Pakistani slaves will object to such a discussion. January 15, 2009: RAW is not the only intelligence agency posting on such boards. So does the C.I.A. This S-2 person is from the C.I.A. Both RAW and the C.I.A. try to prevent any discussion of how countries like India and Pakistan can defend themselves against the United States. I have said that the prospect of Pakistan delivering half a dozen nuclear weapons to its coastal cities such as New York and Washington will stop the U.S. and its drone attacks cold. It does not matter if the United States' air force is a hundred times more capable than Pakistan's or its army has equipment poor Asians can't dream of; that is the beauty of nuclear weapons; they are a great EQUALISER. So let us consider how Pakistan could deliver nuclear weapons to U.S. coastal cities. One way it can do so is by cruise missiles mounted on naval vessels -- which could be submarines or surface vessels. Pakistan has nuclear capable cruise missiles which can be mounted on surface ships. The ship(s) will have to get within range of the target city. If the range of its nuclear capable cruise missiles is 500 miles, the ship will have to get within 500 miles of the target city. Note that this does not have to be a ship belonging to the navy. There is no reason why cruise missiles cannot be installed on merchant ships and properly camouflaged and launched when the ship gets within range of the target. Pakistan also has ballistic missiles of various ranges that are nuclear capable. Such missiles CAN be launched from surface ships, even merchant ships, from specially designed launching platforms and camouflaged/hidden till they get within range of the target. What are some of the other possibilities? Now is the time to get creative. January 15, 2009: Why is this C.I.A. person (S-2) being allowed to post here?….I know Pakistan is a firangi-controlled insurgency within India, created by the firangis to serve their purposes. The United States is the firangi nation in control of Pakistan now. We will rub the United States out of existence. But we would not like Pakistan to be hurt. ADDED ON JANUARY 24, 2009: RAW arranged for the emergency heart problems of Manmohan Singh, to use as grounds for replacing him as prime minister, if necessary, hoping this will forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. After the reference to nuclear weapons as a great equaliser in the addendum above, it instructed Kakodkar to make a statement today against “dependence” on other countries in the matter of technology, placed a story in the media about a lot of high grade uranium in Meghalaya remaining untapped (due to political agitation, arranged by RAW, as I have said below) while India’s nuclear power plants run at half capacity and an editorial in Deccan Chronicle calling for India to carry out a nuclear test, also to forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. All these moves will be reversed in a half second if there is no threat of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. On a typical day, in the Internet edition of The Hindu, the top ten or so stories were about Obama, then one story about India without a reference to Obama or the United States, then another ten or so stories about obama or the United States and this has been typical of the Indian press. RAW has cut down on the number of stories about Obama. But unless the top ten or so stories on a typical day in each media organ are about the greatest living Indian, NOTHING has changed. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi should proceed. ADDED ON JANUARY 25, 2009: RAW cannot be given a lot of time to lift the media cover up above, for obvious reasons. Its time is up. The government and the media are puppets of RAW. They have chosen not to break out of RAW’s control. Their time is also up, as of everyone else in New Delhi. I have already said that anyone who wants to flee New Delhi/Delhi is free to do so; this can be done in a matter of hours. The media have not informed the public at large, so those who know about the impending doom and yet have kept the public in the dark -- this includes all the top people in the government, the media and many others -- are responsible for the deaths that will result. I have said that the objective of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi -- destroying firangi rule over India -- will be achieved even if everyone in New Delhi/Delhi flees and no one is killed. Since the people in the government and the media have chosen to die and take the population of New Delhi/Delhi with them, that is their choice. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will proceed without further delay. Questions about what to do after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi should be sent to me at satchandra24@hotmail.com . In the press releases below I have said that after the nuclear destruction of New Delhi, India’s government will be in Hyderabad and various governmental and affiliated entities will be funded in accordance with my proposal about money. Till the new government of India in Hyderabad begins functioning, all state governments and other entities -- governmental and non-governmental -- outside New Delhi/Delhi should continue to function normally so far as possible. Further instructions will be provided via these press releases as appropriate. ADDED ON FEBRUARY 8, 2009: Large poster-type advertisements by the C.I.A. to recruit Indians have appeared repeatedly in the middle of the Times of India home page within the past few days. This should be seen in conjunction with what I wrote above about the FBI and the C.I.A. expanding and consolidating their presence in India and bringing India into a U.S. colonial grip as tight as the British had. Bringing India under their overt supervision, the Indian government submitted a dossier on the Mumbai attacks to the C.I.A.; first India’s Home Minister himself was going to the U.S. to thus ‘report’ to them but, after a comment of mine, sent a team of Home Ministry officials instead. I have said that the media cover up above, which is just an aspect of the U.S. colonial grip over India, will not be lifted without the nuclear destruction of New Delhi which will destroy the colonial rule. It is time to do so. The failure, on January 20, 2009, of a Brahmos missile to hit its target was followed by a RAW-arranged media blizzard of reports of the failure of India’s missile programs and of DRDO. I knew that that failure, as of the recent ISRO-made European satellite, was due to sabotage -- which I have repeatedly referred to below -- by C.I.A.-RAW. There has been no media blizzard of reports on the discovery that the United States had switched off, during the missile’s flight, the signal to the test zone from the Global Positioning System (GPS) which the missile used for guidance, resulting in the failure. This failure of the missile was pre-arranged by C.I.A.-RAW with India’s army chief, who was present during the test, to ‘neutralise’ what I wrote above on January 15, 2009 about his having been bought by the United States and his rejecting various indigenously developed weapon systems, etc. After this “General Kapoor went on to let the media know that the army might call off the Brahmos deal. The proposal for purchase of 240 of the missiles for two regiments of the army, he indicated, was to be shelved until the missile’s capability was proven” ( http://www.truthout.org/020609B ). I am aghast that India should use ANY electronic support from the U.S. -- or Russia and other countries -- particularly in the defence field, much less for a signal to guide its missiles -- even after what I have written below about “National Security Crisis Due To Microwaves From Satellites” (February 26 ‘06), “Why Are American Companies Providing India’s Satellite Navigation System -- Gagan” (October 24 ‘08) and the addendum of March 23 ‘08; I have been writing to the press with such warnings since 1996-97; in December 1982 I warned about such sabotage in a letter to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. After what I wrote above on December 18 ‘08 about a similar danger from Russia and referred to the plans for Russia to lease out to India several nuclear powered attack submarines, Russia cancelled those plans. But, as I have said, similar dangers exist in importing nuclear power plants and numerous other kinds of civilian and military equipment. Sabotaging and suppressing India’s research and development by C.I.A.-RAW is also an aspect of the colonial grip over India which will only be broken with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ADDED ON FEBRUARY 10, 2009: Whatever I have said above about the dangers of importing equipment or using support of any kind from the United States applies to all white countries, not just the United States which is just the most powerful and therefore the most aggressive of the white countries. It is Biology which makes white countries India’s enemies and necessitates that India enslave/ exterminate the white race or be exterminated. This objective has to be clearly kept in front and used to determine all actions and decisions for India to overcome the military disadvantage it is in right now and survive. To see how the actions and policies of the United States are determined by race, all that is needed is to lift the cover up of what the United States has been doing to India’s greatest scientist and greatest living Indian for over three decades. Killing a few million Indians in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi to lift this cover up and enable India to do what is needed is a small price to pay for the survival of the nation as a whole. ADDED ON FEBRUARY 12-15, 2009: Although any time is a good time to destroy New Delhi, even nights and weekends, now that Parliament is in session it is a particularly good time. I would like to see as many of the traitors killed as possible, though I suspect a lot, if not most, will stay away from the area. The Parliament building is close enough to North Block and South Block so that the blast targeted at North and South Blocks should destroy all of them as well as other nearby complexes. With yields of about twenty kilotons each, the delivery of the nuclear bombs need not be very accurate. The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Much of the United States' buying of people such as India's army chief is done through K. Subrahmanyam who has been the king pin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades. He has been responsible for setting up the LTTE and other insugencies in India and neighbouring countries and he proudly refers to having been responsible for setting up the insurgency in East Pakistan which led to the creation of Bangladesh. He used to be chairman of India's Joint Intelligence Committee and later head of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. I have said that almost all terrorist acts in India since 1983 have been carried out by the C.I.A. through intermediaries in the region, including India's RAW, Pakistan's ISI and various non-governmental entities such as LeT, the Dawood group, etc. RAW is just as much involved in setting up and operating the insurgencies in India including those in Punjab, Kashmir and the Northeast as in neighbouring countries. But, like India's army chief, they are all puppets and agents of the C.I.A. which is ultimately responsible for all the insurgencies and terrorism in the subcontinent and most terrorism around the globe.It is not just India's army chief who has been bought by the United States. I have said that the Kargil war was staged by the C.I.A. with the help of RAW and Pakistan's then army chief (Musharraf) to help Vajpayee -- who, like Nehru was of British intelligence agencies, has been a life long agent of British and American intelligence agencies -- win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence as prime minister. I have said that the firangis still rule the subcontinent after 1947; it is just that the control was transferred to covert agencies after the so-called 'Independence'. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The nuclear destruction of New Delhi is the first stage of India’s new War of Independence. The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On an Indian military discussion board, some one made a post referring to an article in today's New York Times and saying:"This is one guy I have deep respect for. He has a lot of love and admration for India and things Indian. Form your opinion from this Op-Ed in NYT."This article, for whose author this Indian has a lot of love and admiration, is by someone who has been a participant in the WORST crimes against India in India's history by the firangis and in covering up those crimes, which are continuing, for over three decades. When those crimes were referred to recently [in the addendum dated February 10, 2009 above], he rushed to India to write another one of these articles. The Indians' love and admiration for their British conquerors has been replaced by their love and admiration for their American enemies.For some perspective, see the first post in the following thread:RAW: India's External Intelligence AgencyAbout Indians' love and admiration for the white man generally, I wrote the following a few months ago:-Source of Manmohan Singh’s ‘Deep Love’ For BushIndian politicians have condemned Manmohan Singh’s telling Bush that the people of India “deeply love” him. They should see the source of Indians’ love for the white man as I explained below many months ago:-“There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians…. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India [she was treated as the empress of India even before she held any party or government post and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her at her residence; this was so even during BJP governments at the Center]. … In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. … The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love [emphasis added]; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India …), for India’s nuclear supremacy to go forward.”Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, Indians in a position to obstruct India’s nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country will be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADDED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2009: In considering candidate substances that could be used to exterminate the population of a country by ‘salting’ its territory with radioactivity (addendum dated December 30, 2008 above), let us examine Polonium-210 which was used in the death of former Russian agent Litvinenko in Britain. It is produced in nuclear reactors by irradiating Bismuth-209, has a median lethal dose of 50 nanograms, a half-life of 138 days and is reduced to about one eighth of its original radioactivity about 18 months after production ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko_poisoning and http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/06/AR2007010601491_2.html ). This half-life may be too short for the purpose above but substances with longer half-lives can be found. Getting fissile material for ten thousand nuclear warheads is also necessary. The question is: can the ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with radioactivity be done while keeping the regular, explosive thermonuclear warheads in reserve? An IANS report in The Hindu (February 19 ‘09, Internet) is headed “Army takes a U-turn on Arjun tank” and says “army chief General Deepak Kapoor has written to the defence ministry appreciating the tank’s performance”. The question is: can it take a U-turn about arresting traitors (RAW employees, politicians, media people) as well as the invading Americans (addendum dated December 1, 2008 above)? The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (February 17, 2009) On January 24, 2009 I had written:"JANUARY 24, 2009: RAW arranged for the emergency heart problems of Manmohan Singh, to use as grounds for replacing him as prime minister, if necessary, hoping this will forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. After the reference to nuclear weapons as a great equaliser in the addendum above, it instructed Kakodkar to make a statement today against “dependence” on other countries in the matter of technology, placed a story in the media about a lot of high grade uranium in Meghalaya remaining untapped (due to political agitation, arranged by RAW, as I have said below) while India’s nuclear power plants run at half capacity and an editorial in Deccan Chronicle calling for India to carry out a nuclear test, also to forestall the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. All these moves will be reversed in a half second if there is no threat of the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. On a typical day, in the Internet edition of The Hindu, the top ten or so stories were about Obama, then one story about India without a reference to Obama or the United States, then another ten or so stories about obama or the United States and this has been typical of the Indian press. RAW has cut down on the number of stories about Obama. But unless the top ten or so stories on a typical day in each media organ are about the greatest living Indian, NOTHING has changed. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi should proceed."A day or so ago, a photograph showed the American ambassador and his wife walking alongside Manmohan Singh's wife in a 'Walk for Cancer' or such in New Delhi. It was meant to pass a message from the C.I.A. to Manmohan Singh through his wife that he will be airlifted out of India, by helicopter and plane, if necessary, as the U.S. airlifted Ferdinand Marcos out of the Philippines and was prepared to lift Indira Gandhi out of India after she lost the election after the Emergency. The United States has such arrangements with all its Third World ruler-puppets who are C.I.A. agents. Make no mistake about it: whosoever is meant to replace Manmohan Singh -- Mukherjee or Mulayam Singh Yadav or Sharad Pawar or whoever -- is no less of a U.S./C.I.A. agent than Manmohan Singh.A post on an Indian military discussion board on February 16'09 said:"Saw the army chief and it was crazy to see the security around him - 20 or 30 army-wallahs and 5-6 commandos. It was definitely overkill in an area that possessed that amt of security... The other chiefs were much less visible, came in very inconspicuously, with only ADC and 1-2 personal sec offrs. I wonder why the Army tamasha then!!"The answer is the army chief's enhanced security was due to his having been named as having been bought by the United States (above).There have been books by former C.I.A. employees which describe the kind of arrangement mentioned above that it has with a lot of Third World rulers. After Benazir Bhutto's death, when some pointed a finger of suspicion at the U.S. for having assassinated her, the U.S. said don't blame us; we were constantly giving her information about threats to her life. The C.I.A. supplies such information also as part of such 'security' arrangements with a lot of Third World rulers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (February 18, 2009) In post # 11 above I said much of the United States' buying of people like India's army chief is done through K. Subrahmanyam who has been the king pin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades. He has also been in charge of media control. Many, if not most, of the people with Indian identities and quite a few with Pakistani identities posting even on this board are operatives of C.I.A.-RAW. In recent years C.I.A.-RAW has established profound control over India's print, broadcast and online media. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (February 18, 2009) The Indian who urged people to read the column by Thomas Friedman referred to in the post above is an operative of C.I.A.-RAW. Almost all of the moderators on that board are also operatives of C.I.A.-RAW. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (February 18, 2009) When it comes to love and admiration for their firangi enemies, most Pakistanis are no different from Indians, but, as I said in another thread, in Pakistan there are movements -- Jihadi movements, madarasa educated youngsters, etc. -- which do motivate many Pakistanis to fight their white enemies; in India, however, even such movements are lacking. After I wrote that, RAW started a "Ram Sene(Sena)" in India which attacked girls in pubs; the idea is to give the Americans justification for attacking/occupying India as they attack and partially occupy Pakistan.As I have said in another thread, many, if not most, of those posting on THIS board under Indian identites and quite a few posting under Pakistani identities are operatives of C.I.A.-RAW. As for hiding from them, if you click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 in the following thread, you will see how I have been under their surveillance for over three decades:- http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The United States already occupies Afghanistan and partly occupies Pakistan on the pretext of fighting the Taliban and its progressive colonization of India described above continues apace. A report headed “Taliban has to be confronted and defeated: India” has the Minister of State for External Affairs Anand Sharma saying “There is no cause that can justify the killing of civilians” (The Hindu, February 19 ‘09, Internet). These traitors have to be exterminated first. I would like to see the nuclear destruction of New Delhi before the end of this session of parliament, with some time left before the end of the session as margin of safety (they have been ending the sessions prematurely in their haste to get out of the area). The question is: will the media cover up referred to above end before that? Lifting the media cover up requires reporting with banner headlines in all of the major print and broadcast media. This is easy to do since RAW controls PTI and hundreds of media organs, which have been obeying RAW regarding these matters, receive these press releases. ADDED ON FEBRUARY 21, 2009: In the addendum of August 4 ’07 to December 6 ’07 below I wrote: “Anyone in public life who is silent about nuclear supremacy for India is for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy -- the United States -- and deserves to be and will be shot as a traitor. It should not be difficult for a political party, which wants development in its state, to identify at least twenty large new projects, requiring investment of at least a few lakh crores and demand that the Central government use the UNLIMITED amount of capital available to it (simply by printing the money, so long as the money is used for productive purposes, because the money so printed and invested increases the Gross Domestic Product by an amount equal to the amount of money invested IMMEDIATELY and by several times the amount of money invested over time; see my proposal about money in letters below, starting with the letter dated January 5 '04; as I have said in the letter dated February 26 '05 below and elsewhere, the Americans have been suppressing my proposal about money, because it is in the economic field what nuclear weapons are in the military field, while they promote inferior Indian niggers such as Subramanian Swamy and Manmohan Singh, both of them traitors on the C.I.A.'s payroll) to fund them, rather than allow the United States to make a surprise attack on India's nuclear installations from a Sethusamudram channel; this will induce other states to make similar demands and further money will be pumped into India's economy by the many, many fold expansion of India's nuclear and missile programs to build ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States -- a Ram Setu for the present. Realising that he is nothing but a piece of dog-faeces and there is no advantage in disobeying the present day Incarnation, Advani has stopped talking about the Ram Setu from the past, though he is yet to speak about the Ram Setu for the present; the sooner all the other politicians come to this realisation, the better for the country and for them. In a letter below I said that India's nuclear scientists that have been bought up will now sabotage India's indigenous nuclear program. Such sabotage has already started. As I said in an earlier letter below, one of the United States' objectives is to get Indian scientists to switch to designing 'proliferation resistant' nuclear reactors -- that is, reactors from which it will be difficult to get material for making weapons. In his speech to the IAEA in Vienna recently, Kakodkar said India is "actively pursuing the design and development of Advanced Heavy Water Reactor which will mainly use thorium [and] would meet ... proliferation resistance goals" (Indian Express, September 21 '07, Internet). This is grievous sabotage of India's nuclear program. The number of traitors -- thousands of RAW employees, politicians, media people, etc. -- that will have to be executed -- they include all those in public life who are silent about nuclear supremacy for India and, therefore, are for nuclear supremacy for India's number one enemy, the United States -- is so large that a practical way would be to line them up along trenches and machine gun them. Locations of such trenches could be along Raj Path in New Delhi and elsewhere. When the United States sent its warships into the Palk Straits recently, in the area where it wants the Sethusamudram channel, it was in service of its plans to deny, by military occupation, India access to India's thorium deposits in case it cannot get India to switch to 'proliferation-resistant' reactors, etc. The International Atomic Energy Agency is a principal instrument of American imperialism used to provide grounds for invasions and occupation of other countries and calling its head an "honoured guest" of India is like Iraq's puppet government calling American occupation forces honoured guests of Iraq. Time is of the essence in acquiring nuclear supremacy for India and for removing, by machine guns and bulldozers, all those who stand in the way of India's nuclear supremacy. An abandonment of the nuclear deal (the prospect of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches has changed the mind of UPA politicians who were otherwise quite ready for mid-term polls which are being cited as the reason for the change) must not divert attention from the most urgent pursuit of nuclear supremacy for India which remains a critical requirement and must be India's one-point agenda until nuclear supremacy is acquired and the threat from the United States is eliminated. While the nuclear deal was the United States' 'peaceful' option for imposing the deepest slavery on India, other options, including a surprise 'counter-proliferation' nuclear strike on India, will get priority as the nuclear deal is abandoned. The task before India remains building ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States and doing this in the shortest possible time with a single-minded effort that must determine policy in all other areas. Politicians -- who are nothing but pieces of dog-faeces -- cannot accomplish this task; they will continue to be obstacles in the way of nuclear supremacy for India and must still be machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches along with thousands of RAW employees, media people, etc.” Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of machine guns and bulldozers, this will be accomplished by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. That time has come. ADDED ON FEBRUARY 22-24, 2009: The Americans had arrived in Mumbai uninvited and said they did not need visas or papers and were “detained” by immigration and customs people. The Indian government, in terror of the United States, had no courage to keep them in custody or send them back and, after the fact of their invasion, pretended it had asked for the FBI’s and other U.S. agencies’ “help”. The Americans went along with this pretense. As the complaint to a court by the lawyer for one of the Indian detainees about a night-long bodily assault with numerous injuries on him by an FBI agent after stripping him shows, the Americans are in charge, with the Indians playing a subordinate role from the Home Minister on down and have been running an Abu Ghraib like operation on Indian detainees in India. The Americans getting ‘permissions’ from Indian officials for various things is like the occupying Americans in Iraq getting ‘permissions’ from the “sovereign” Iraqi government for various things and Iraq’s “sovereign” government asking the Americans to stay and “help” it. From covert C.I.A. and American rule over India, the Mumbai operation was designed to transition to overt American rule over India and the subcontinent as a whole. The Americans being overlords in the ‘investigation’ of the C.I.A.-planned and executed Mumbai terror operation is the same template for American overlordship over India which Mukherjee signed in the Defence Framework Agreement before the nuclear deal and the nuclear deal itself. No amount of ‘exposes’ or reports of scandal will make any difference, only the changing of the reality on the ground. The Indians will continue to submit as they submitted to the scandal of the British rule over India. If New Delhi is not destroyed now with nuclear bombs, followed by the crash program for the nuclear arms build-up and its accompaniments I have described, India will never get out of the deepest slavery to the white man. The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- You know nothing about Satish Chandra. Click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread if you would like to educate yourself:RAW: India's External Intelligence AgencyLord Macaulay's address to the British parliament, Feb 2, 1835:-"I have travelled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think that we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation."The success of this program is seen in Indians -- from president and prime minister to parliament to the media -- exulting in Oscar awards from the white master for the British movie, "Slumdog Millionaire", which defecates on India and calling it their own.The British succeeded in this program because of their superiority in technology. India's RAW, India's Army chief, India's government and media -- all participate in the sabotage and suppression of the development of India's technology, as you will see if you click on the link above, as also in the suppression of India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian who is kept under 24-hour satellite surveillance for this purpose by the Americans who spend hundreds of millions of dollars each year on 'neutralising' him. Attached Images 73324700.jpg (19.9 KB, 1 views) 　 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Since I wrote the above, the Americans have demanded access to Mumbai attack suspects in Pakistan, knowing that the Pakistanis "will continue to submit as they submitted to the scandal of the British rule over India" (see above) because they know the same cowardly Indian blood runs in the veins of Pakistanis. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A thunderous silence descends on both their Indian and Pakistani slaves when their slavery to the White Master is pointed out. 'Why are you asking us to fight the White Master? The task assigned to us by the White Master is to fight each other'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You cannot shame or prod the Indians into action against the white master. Those in a position to block action -- they are in New Delhi -- have to be removed like so much inanimate matter. Two nuclear explosions are needed to move enough of this inanimate matter out of the way. This is a time sensitive task & has to be done without delay. Only technical or logistical reasons can justify any delay; otherwise this should go ahead at the first possible opportunity. There should be no hesitation in this. This is merely the first stage of a bigger task I have described -- nuclear supremacy over and extermination of the white race and the liberation of India. ADDED ON FEBRUARY 28, 2009: 1) The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On February 14, 2009, the Minister of State for Commerce and Power, Jairam Ramesh, reportedly said no private companies will be allowed in the nuclear power field until the year 2020:No nuclear power plants for Pvt Cos till 2020- Policy-Economy-News-The Economic TimesIn fact, what he said was:""I do not foresee a role for the private sector in the first generation of production of nuclear power of 20,000 mega watt on strategic [emphasis added], safety, fuel and management grounds. Expansion of nuclear energy has necessarily to be based either on Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) or on its joint venture with public entities as only such companies could take a 10 year perspective without worrying over cash flows, borrowings or meltdown," Mr Ramesh told reporters on Saturday. He was in Mumbai to attend the signing ceremony of a memorandum of understanding between the NPCIL and National Thermal Power Corporation." Since the target of generating 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power by 2020 included a large proportion from reactors imported from the United States and other countries, this meant no American or other private companies were to be allowed in the nuclear field in the first 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power, in effect nullifying a part (only a part; it did not nullify the disadvantages from importing light water reactors and fuel from Russia's government-owned entity and the deadliest and strategically fatal part of the nuclear deal -- the new IAEA agreement which brings additional Indian reactors and even research institutions such as the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research under restrictions and IAEA inspections, especially if this new IAEA agreement is ratified/finalised on the pretext that it is needed for the highly injurious import of light water reactors and fuel from Russia) of the C.I.A.-RAW-engineered treasonous, strategically suicidal nuclear deal with "its various aspects — replacing indigenous production of uranium and reactors with imports, the capping, rollback and elimination of India’s nuclear weapons program, media control and buying up politicians, scientists, etc. for this purpose"; see post # 1 in the following thread as well as the links at the bottom of that post:RAW: India's External Intelligence AgencyA couple of days ago, according to a press report, the AIDS woman (Sonia) told Jairam Ramesh to resign. It was the statement above by him which led to this "surprise" step. A report yesterday had a minister in the Prime Minister's office say that an amendment to the Atomic Energy Act to allow private companies in the field has already been prepared and will be passed right after the elections:Atomic Energy Act to be amended soonThat is, if the Prime Minister's office and the parliament, etc., still exist, which they won't. Click on the links at the bottom of post # 1 in the following thread:RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2) After a letter of mine to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982 about the necessity for India to defend against a nuclear first strike by the United States, two strategic programs, both directed at defence against the United States, were started: the Integrated Guided Missiles Program and the Centre for Advanced Technology (CAT) near Indore. The slowing and suppression by India’s government of the strategic missiles program over the years is well known. The gutting of the strategic programs of CAT started during the Vajpayee government and now it has been turned into a civilian research facility that operates in collaboration with American research laboratories, allowing them to monitor it and eliminating its objective of developing defences against the United States. 3) The Bharat Rakshak online discussion forum, most of whose moderators are operatives of C.I.A.-RAW, does not allow a discussion thread on an indigenous Medium Combat Aircraft, only on imports, just as it has numerous threads inciting the vilest hatred toward Pakistan but promptly bans anyone who refers to India defending itself against the United States. ADDED ON MARCH 2, 2009: The following are two posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- My reference to the Medium Combat Aircraft above has to be put in perspective. The following is what I said on January 25, 2008:-"The bottom line is that India must have military supremacy over all nations of the world -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- and since the United States is the most powerful nation in the world today, India's principal task is to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States and that cannot be attained by depending on the United States or other countries for 'aid'; India is quite capable of attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States and [India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled media] try to prevent it by falsely running DRDO down, promoting foreign dependence and imports, etc., and this is part of the tactics foreign intelligence agencies use, through Indians on their payroll, to keep India down.India has no shortage of manpower and my proposal about money (click on the links at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread: RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ) can be used to make India both militarily and economically number 1 in the world but military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- is even more important than economic supremacy because, without it, it can be subjugated and enslaved (let's leave out who does the subjugation and enslavement). All of the invaders who conquered and enslaved India came from much poorer countries than 'the Golden Hind'.DRDO is doing great work, but that does not mean things can't be even better. I have said that India should set up ten parallel DRDOs, each the size of the present DRDO and let three of them compete for a successful tank design, three for a successful figher plane and so on and let the best design win. The Soviet Union had a system of internal competition between government-owned design and production organisations of this kind and it can work for India also (though I don't think DRDO's work has suffered due to a lack of competition; having ten times as many people work on defence R & D may simply enable ten times as many things to be done). Another important point is that weapons such as tanks and fighter planes which carry human beings are a lot more difficult to design and produce than, say, intercontinental ballistic missiles which give a million times or more returns for the same investment of time and effort ('bang for the buck') so far as increasing a country's military power is concerned. Since India's principal aim should be nuclear supremacy, it should focus on designing and producing intercontinental ballistic missiles more than tanks and fighter planes; if you have nuclear supremacy over the United States, most other defence-related issues will take care of themselves. And, as I said, designing and building ICBMs that will do the job can be done a lot faster and require fewer resources, though India has the resources to build both ICBMs and tanks and fighter planes. The main advantage of focusing on ICBMs is time; it will bring India military supremacy a lot sooner than giving a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes (which will never bring India military supremacy over the United States). Another point is that although India should build nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed submarines carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles (SSBNs), like the ATV it is building, building these weapons platforms (SSBNs) is a lot more time and resource-consuming than building ICBMs that can be launched from road and rail-mobile vehicles. It is a mistake to make India's nuclear arsenal primarily a second strike resource (which is what SSBNs are good at); India's nuclear arsenal should primarily be for a first strike -- that is how you gain nuclear supremacy, by being able to carry out a successful first strike -- and a sufficiently large arsenal of road and rail-mobile ICBMs can be produced a lot faster than an arsenal based on SSBNs. Again, time is important. This does not mean India should not produce SSBNs, just that the emphasis should be on producing a large number of road and rail-mobile ICBMs. I also believe that India's anti-ballistic missile systems will be considerably better than those of the United States -- as DRDO has correctly said, its systems to defend against short and medium range missiles are already better than those of the United States -- if India can avoid sabotage by politicians and RAW on the C.I.A.'s payroll who try to shove american 'help' down India's throat. This is another reason India can afford to focus on road and rail-mobile ICBMs rather than on SSBNs (SSBNs are inherently difficult to destroy; with a really effective ABM system, India's road and rail-mobile ICBMs will also be difficult to destroy). Avoiding foreign 'help' is not a matter of 'false pride'; avoiding foreign help is essential for India's nuclear supremacy.Instead of ICBMs, India's nuclear weapons may primarily be delivered by the hyperplane (Avatar) under development. And its defence against enemy ICBMs may be provided by the space-based weapons, Durga (Directionally Unrestricted Ray-Gun Array) and Kali (Kinetic Attack Loitering Interceptor) systems."And it is necessary to put tanks and fighter planes in general in perspective. This is what I said on February 27, 2008:-"DRDO are India's real warriors, not the military. In the old days, the sword-makers could make the swords, but warriors had to wield them. Even today's tanks and fighter planes need warriors to drive or fly them. But DRDO, along with the nuclear scientists and production units such as Bharat Dynamics, can make nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles and the people who do the research and development and production can also push the button to send them off to obliterate the enemy. The military muscle from nuclear-tipped ICBMs is milllions of times greater than the power of tanks and fighter planes. The scientists and engineers are also the real soldiers. They should have their hand on the nuclear button, not the military or the politicians. The military simply obey the politicians and India's politicians are all traitors on the payrolls of the C.I.A. etc. The military are not needed to launch the nuclear-tipped ICBMs; that can be done by scientists and engineers pushing a button sitting at a desk. The tanks and fighter planes the military can drive/fly are insignificant and nearly worthless in the military power they provide. Since they (the military) also obey the traitor politicians and civil servants, they are worse than worthless. It is time scientists and engineers are recognised for what they are -- the true defenders and guardians of the country.The military should obey and take orders from DRDO; the same for civil servants and politicians. This can be done by amending the Constitution; if the politicians don't agree to amending the Constitution, it can be done in other ways." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ India Has No greater Enemy Than The United States Click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread:-RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency Has anyone seen what I have said and am saying about the necessity for India to defend against the United States in any of the print or broadcast media? Why not? After reading what is in that link [or what is said below, starting from January 5, 2004], consider what it tells you about the control of India's media and, therefore, of its government, its population, its economy and defence, its future and its current fortunes by the United States.What does it tell you about the immeasurable injury to India's economy, its prosperity, its defence and well-being the United States has been committing? What does it tell you about the unfathomable depths of the United States' enmity and malevolence toward India? What does it tell you about the threat to India's survival, not just well-being, that the United States is? Is there anything in human history that exceeds the malice and depravity of the United States' acts toward India? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDED ON MARCH 3, 2009: The colonization of India by the United States continues apace. A PTI report today says: “In a bid to evolve a joint strategy to bring perpetrators of the Mumbai terror strikes to justice, top US and Indian officials on Tuesday asked Pakistan to extend cooperation in investigating the 26/11 attacks. FBI Director Robert Mueller, who arrived here on Tuesday afternoon, held a series of meetings with Union Home Minister P Chidambaram and Intelligence Bureau Chief Rajiv Mathur among others. …”. The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: India Has No greater Enemy Than The United States To 'neutralise' the post above, the C.I.A., through RAW, masterminded the attack on Sri Lankan cricketers in Pakistan, as it masterminded the Mumbai attacks, to show many colonised cricket-loving Indians in government, who know about C.I.A.-RAW's masterminding of the Mumbai attacks but are too cowardly to point a finger at the United States despite a U.S. official, in testimony to the U.S. Foreign Relations Committee that I have cited in other threads, acknowledging U.S. masterminding of such terrorism, that the United States is just as much an enemy of Pakistan as of India. And since these cowardly Indians can only acknowledge Pakistan, not the United States, as India's enemy and your enemy's enemy is your friend, therefore the United States is India's friend. But the United States' enmity toward India has little to do with Pakistan and its scope and intensity remain the same even if there were no Pakistan, as is clear if you click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 in the thread [ http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html ] cited above.I have said in another thread that Pakistan is a firangi-controlled insurgency within India, created by the firangis to serve their purposes. The United States is the firangi nation in control of Pakistan now. We will rub the United States out of existence. But we would not like Pakistan to be hurt. I have said that the depth of the firangis' malice toward India can be seen in the following from Lord Macaulay:- Lord Macaulay's address to the British parliament, Feb 2, 1835:- "I have travelled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think that we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The success of this program is seen in Indians -- from president and prime minister to parliament to the media -- exulting in Oscar awards from the white master for the British movie, "Slumdog Millionaire", which defecates on India and calling it their own. How shall we rub the United States out of existence? I have said that in designing nuclear weapons for use against the United States, radioactive materials should be identified that can be dispersed over the territory of the United States, either via separate radiological weapons (“dirty bombs”) or as part of the regular thermonuclear weapons, that will so contaminate the territory of the United States with radioactivity that nothing will grow there for at least several years that can be consumed without getting a lethal dose of radiation. This will force the Americans who survive the nuclear bomb explosions on the four thousand largest population centers to eat one another till no one remains alive.The ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with such radioactivity can be done in a separate operation -- such as by unmanned aerial vehicles -- after its four thousand largest population centers have been destroyed by regular thermonuclear weapons. This requires that India be the dominant power after the initial exchange of, say, five thousand nuclear weapons between India and the United States. India has the leadership required for this but the cover up of the news and views of the leadership has to be lifted. Lifting this cover up is the first stage of India’s war for survival. As this cover up is lifted, many politicians, media people and, above all, RAW bosses such as the kingpin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India for decades, K. Subrahmanyam, will try to flee to the United States and those who succeed will share the fate of Americans. Once the cover up of the news about the greatest living Indian is lifted, the genocidal intent and behaviour of the United States toward India will be clear. He has been writing about it for three decades. In considering candidate substances that could be used to exterminate the population of a country by ‘salting’ its territory with radioactivity, let us examine Polonium-210 which was used in the death of former Russian agent Litvinenko in Britain. It is produced in nuclear reactors by irradiating Bismuth-209, has a median lethal dose of 50 nanograms, a half-life of 138 days and is reduced to about one eighth of its original radioactivity about 18 months after production ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko_poisoning and http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/06/AR2007010601491_2.html ). This half-life may be too short for the purpose above but substances with longer half-lives can be found.Getting fissile material for ten thousand nuclear warheads is also necessary. The question is: can the ‘salting’ of the territory of the United States with radioactivity be done while keeping the regular, explosive thermonuclear warheads in reserve? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following is from a post I made today on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW:-"K. Subrahmanyam, former chairman of India's Joint Intelligence Committee, proudly refers to having been responsible for setting up the insurgency in East Pakistan that led to the creation of Bangladesh. But he was doing that as an agent of the C.I.A. just as he and RAW, as agents of the C.I.A., have set up the LTTE, etc., in Sri Lanka and insurgencies within India in Kashmir, Punjab, the Northeast, etc. Both RAW and the ISI function as branches of the C.I.A. If the ISI was involved in the recent Bangladesh Rifles mutiny, it was retaliating for RAW's setting up the insurgency in East Pakistan which led to the creation of Bangladesh, which I had referred to just before the BDR mutiny. But both RAW and ISI and other such entities function as nigger slaves and puppets of the C.I.A. In Sri Lanka, C.I.A.-RAW at one point had about seven different Tamil terrorist/insurgent groups and C.I.A.-RAW was making them all fight one another as well the Sri Lanka government [, as I described in a letter, which appeared in Indian Express, Delhi, just before Rajiv Gandhi‘s assassination by C.I.A.-RAW, in which I also referred to a report in the New York Times of his telling the foreign press in New Delhi that ‘the Indian army has gone berserk in Kashmir, human rights have been violated in Kashmir‘, in a bid to get U.S. legislators‘ support for continued support to him from the C.I.A. for the impending general elections because K. Subrahmanyam thought it will make me think he was assassinated because of what I wrote about him in that letter though he was actually assassinated because he had restarted India‘s nuclear weapons program because of what I said to Mrs. Marcos of the Philippines about nuclear weapons in the telephone conversation referred to above which the C.I.A. had duly communicated to him and because, after the first Iraq invasion by the United States, he had realized the truth of what I wrote to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982 about the threat to India from the United States, etc.]. Even the naxalite movement in India is sponsored and maintained by C.I.A.-RAW, as the Purulia arms drop and the cover up of the actual recipients of those arms and letting the captured arms-dropper go back to Britain on RAW's intervention shows. I have said India has no greater enemy than the United States and the same is true of both Pakistan and Bangladesh as well ....". It should be clear from the above that India has had no effective government ever since its so-called Independence that would advance and protect India’s interests. The pretender governments since the so-called Independence cannot be allowed to continue. The United States is now establishing overt colonial rule over India. A new war of Independence is necessary. In a letter dated December 22, 1982 to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, I also referred to the United States’ plans for India’s break-up, referring to a report in the Washington Post quoting a U.S. “diplomat” in New Delhi as saying “If regionalism takes off in Karnataka and the Telugu people take off in Andhra Pradesh, we will have to take a serious look at what is happening…” and I wrote “The phrase “take off” is used for a positively desired and looked for state of affairs, such as economic “take off”. Clearly, the Americans are looking forward to India’s break-up and are asserting a right to intervene in it”. Those plans, through various C.I.A.-sponsored insurgencies in the subcontinent and intervention in the subcontinent at various points -- not just Kashmir -- and under various pretexts has continued. With the U.S. invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, partial invasion and occupation of Pakistan, the Defence Framework Agreement with India, the nuclear deal, bringing India under overt and direct C.I.A. and FBI control through the U.S.-sponsored Mumbai attacks, etc., the U.S. plans for India’s break-up, occupation and colonization have reached a take-off point. If this rapid and absolute enslavement of India is not stopped and reversed now, it will never be possible. It cannot be stopped except through war, because RAW’s media blackout of me makes it impossible to educate the public and its flagrant falsification of vote counts when I ran for the Lok Sabha from East Delhi in 1996 even when I had no chance of winning (when I described, in a letter to the press, what was done -- which had shocked even the government officials involved in running the polls -- after changing the Returning Officer in mid-stream, Vajpayee had the BJP candidate, who had won, resign from the seat), its blocking, like the C.I.A., my mail and other communications, forcing I.I.T., Kanpur (by immediately cutting the I.I.T.s’ budgets and putting a freeze on hiring) and the Indian Institute of Advanced Study in Shimla (by a “committee of secretaries of the Indian government” voting to force it out of the buildings it was housed in in Shimla) to abandon any plans to offer me a position, contacting, like the C.I.A. and forcing, with carrot, stick and harassment, anyone I came in contact with to induce harassment, denying me any income of any kind, robbing me of my money and properties in India, forcing me to live for six and a half months in an M.I.T. library that used to be open 24-hours, sleeping on the chairs at night and going without food for up to three weeks at a time, remaining semi-starved year after year after year, forcing me to move about forty times in four years within the Boston area for a place to stay, subjected to indignities and abuse suffered by prisoners, etc., etc., ( I am attaching to this E-mail about 70 comments by K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director Michael Hayden posted under their own names -- another 70 or so of the most abusive comments by them were deleted by K. Subrahmanyam -- just this past August (2008) while intercepting and mutilating my articles on Merinews.com and harassing and making it impossible for me to post my articles there) makes it impossible to do it any other way. ADDED ON MARCH 18, 2009: The following are eight posts I have made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Echoing what I have been saying about the United States being the source and mastermind of all separatism and terrorism in the Indian subcontinent and other activities, even more injurious than terrorism, speaking yesterday at the 'India Today' conclave in New Delhi, " Musharaff accuses India of fomenting trouble in Pak: ... accused Indian agencies of fomenting trouble in his country. ... he claimed that India's Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) were helping militants based in Afghanistan spread trouble in Pakistan. "We have to accept the reality. Your RAW does exactly what the ISI does [emphasis added]. My request is let us tackle [emphasis added] RAW and ISI to stop this confrontation," he said." (PTI report dated March 7'09 in Hindustan Times). Note that he did not deny that the ISI does what it is accused of doing. But he did not say that both RAW and ISI have been doing this as agents of the C.I.A.; rather, he said "let us tackle RAW and ISI to stop this confrontation", acknowledging that these activities of RAW and ISI have been IMPOSED on these two countries, that these two agencies are NOT under the control of these two countries. Imposed by who, unless he is suggesting these are rogue agencies acting on their own? Imposed by the United States' C.I.A. whose branches these two agencies effectively are but neither he nor Indian government officials acknowledge that. The following is a post I made three days ago on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, in a thread titled "Pak terrorized by Demons It Created":-RAW is the demon that has been terrorising India, as I have shown in previous threads. RAW does this as a servant of a bigger demon, the C.I.A.Also see the first post in this thread: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html and the link at the bottom of the first post in the above thread.RAW can strike anywhere in India and the rest of the Subcontinent at will and it has demonstrated this hundreds of times since 1983. …/ The latest move of the United States to break-up and colonise India is to INVADE Sri Lanka on the pretext of rescuing 200,000 Tamils it says are being held hostage by the LTTE, though, as I have said, the LTTE is a creation of the C.I.A., through RAW -- one of the several insurgencies it has created in the subcontinent to break-up, invade, occupy and colonise the subcontinent and, if the LTTE is holding 200,000 Tamils hostage, it is at the instigation of and under instructions from C.I.A.-RAW:-"(K. P. Nayar in The Telegraph, Calcutta, of March 8 '09) US taps Delhi on Lanka Foray -- Washington to sound out menon on evacuation mission: [Washington, March 7] The Obama adminstration will sound out foreign secretary Shiv Shankar Menon on Monday on India's support for a US-led invasion of Sri Lanka to evacuate nearly 200,000 Tamil civilians trapped inside territory controlled by the [LTTE] with precariously declining stocks of food or medicine./ "We had some people there to look at the situation to identify what the possibilities might be. We would do whatever we can to help these people, assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian affairs Richard Boucher told a group of South Asian journalists yesterday./ The plan to be put before Menon [in Washington] is for a marine expeditionary brigade attached to thye U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM) to go into Sri Lanka with the support of the US navy and air force, according to American sources privy to the plan." The Americans are planning to invade, occupy and colonise India through India's traitor government from the prime minister on down. But not only must the U.S. not be allowed to enter Sri Lanka, India has the responsibility, as I have said, to forcibly expel it from Afghanistan. The U.S.-sponsored separatist insurgency in Sri Lanka should be dealt with as the U.S.-sponsored insurgencies in Punjab, Kashmir and the Northeast. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- More than a year ago I said:-"Russia's foreign minister says "UN Security Council resolution on Iran [imposing sanctions on Iran] reflects Russia's interests". But the demand that a country obey your demands regarding non-proliferation of nuclear weapons is a demand that you will have the power to inflict instant death on that entire country without that country being able to do anything about it; it is a demand for the ultimate kind of slavery and no self-respecting country can, or ought to, submit to it. The only reasonable response to such a demand is to totally destroy such a presumptuous tyrant as soon as you are able to do so. Such a demand is a way of ensuring your own destruction in the not too distant future; it will be crazy for Iran or any other country which is subjected to such demands not to destroy you as soon as it is able to do so. Since countries like Russia are unthinking camp-followers of the United States which is the source of this attempt to impose this ultimate kind of slavery on other countries, the interests of Russia will best be served by destroying the United States as soon as possible because its mad dog behavior of trying to impose such ultimate slavery on other countries will otherwise lead to the destruction of the makers of such demands in the not too distant future."U. S. Admiral William Fallon (who was called "the sole bulwark against an American attack on Iran"), when commander of the U.S. Central Command and asked about war with Iran in an interview to Esquire magazine (April 23, 2008), said: "Get serious. These guys are ants. When the time comes, you crush them". This is how the United States views India and Pakistan also. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- More than a year ago, I also said:-"Slavery in nuclear matters also makes possible slavery in economic matters. In Special Economic Zones (SEZs), American companies use Indians as slave laborers-- paying them a fraction of what even the lowest paid American workers are paid-- to produce goods and services for the American consumer. In no way can the output of Special Economic Zones be considered a part of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), nor should the output of software export and call center, etc. (B.P.O.) operations--which meet the needs of American companies and American consumers-- be considered a part of India's GDP and most of the rise in GDP growth rate, being trumpeted by traitors, is from the SEZs and IT and B.P.O. operations. If a foreign enemy comes and commandeers millions of Indians to work as slave labor to meet the needs of its own people-- having them work within India rather than shipping them to America as slaves used to be shipped through native middlemen to pick cotton-- it is still slavery. I have written about the fallacy because of which exports and earning a lot of foreign exchange are considered a good thing and said 'A crore of goods and services sold domestically is worth several crores of goods and services sold abroad so far as the effect on India's prosperity is concerned'. The foreign exchange (such as dollars) you get by selling goods and services abroad can only ultimately be used to buy goods and services abroad which starts chains of economic activity in the foreign country (the United States) rather than in your own country and, through the 'multiplier effect' I have described, increases the GDP of the foreign country by several times the amount of the foreign exchange you obtained, not your own country's. A report on a mega refinery complex being set up in an SEZ on India's west coast by Reliance refers to the several thousand luxurious villas that will be built for foreign workers while Indian slave laborers will live in slave housing; the output of the refinery --gasoline-- will be used almost exclusively by American consumers but the environmental harm caused by the refinery will occur in India; by using Indian companies as a front-- in this case Reliance into which Americans will be putting their money-- American capital will be producing gasoline for American consumers using Indians as slave labor and transferring the pollution caused by the refineries to India. In no way can this SEZ be called a part of India's economy. Even in the IT sector, the largest Indian company-- Infosys-- is more than half owned by foreigners; hundreds of thousands of engineering graduates per year are being produced by Indian engineering colleges -- RAW, which runs the Indian government, acts as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and has engineered this use of Indian engineering graduates-- to work as software coolies for American companies (you do not need engineering graduates to provide payroll processing which is what Indian software coolies have mostly been doing) while many others work night shifts in the B.P.O. industry, in call centers, doing what does not require even a high school education to do in the United States. SEZs were set up in China by bribing people in the Chinese government to let American companies use Chinese people as slave labor for American consumers and all the Chinese in government now wear Western suits and send as many Chinese for higher studies and to settle in the U.S. as do Indians. To camouflage the true nature of this arrangement, the United States government regularly 'complains' to the Chinese government about the U.S. "trade deficit" with China, but in no way can American companies producing in China, using Chinese as slave laborers, for the American consumer and then shipping the products to the United States be considered 'trade'; it is slave trade but instead of the slaves' bodies, their products are being shipped to the United States. Because of Indians knowing English, Americans first used Indians for IT and B.P.O. but are now switching to manufacture as well, the basic paradigm being the use of the populations of China and India as slave labor for the American consumer by bribing people in the governments of these countries. In the case of Russia, the paradigm is to loot Russia's natural resources for the American consumer by bribing people in the Russian government. Because of the exchange rate, the slave laborers in the B.P.O., doing health-destroying work at night at a fraction of the wage rates of the lowest paid American workers, are paid large amounts in rupees (the foreign exchange goes to the government and can only be used ultimately to buy foreign goods and services and increase the foreign country's GDP, not India's, as I have said) which enables them to buy the output of ten times as many Indians while producing nothing for the Indian economy-- the goods and services they produce meet the needs of American consumers and companies, not Indian consumers and companies. One million B.P.O. workers suck up the output of, say, ten million Indians; ten million B.P.O. workers will suck up the output of a hundred million Indians, while producing nothing for the Indian economy. Thus, American companies, while using ten million Indians as direct slave laborers, will be using a hundred million Indians as indirect slave laborers because a hundred million Indians will be supporting the ten million Indians working for American companies as slave laborers. And, since these ten million Indians will be producing nothing for the Indian economy (no goods or services for the Indian consumer) and will be sucking up the output of another one hundred million Indians-- thus, they will be greatly REDUCING India's GDP available to the rest of the population, not adding to it-- the rupee salaries paid to these ten million Indians will be highly inflationary as well, further damaging the Indian economy. This applies to operations such as call centers (B.P.O.), software export and SEZs for export.Haryana's chief minister asked how else to provide employment to the state's population. By implementing my proposal about money (click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of this thread: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence-military/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html ), India can have true and extremely rapid prosperity and full employment." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Americans are now planning to force India to modify its Thorium-based power generation program so it is "proliferation-resistant", so India is not able to get fissile material from it that could be made into weapons and are binding India into cooperating with their 'non-proliferation' initiatives for this purpose. Recently, the foreign minister of Pakistan, which has a minimal nuclear deterrent like India, said if Pakistan had not obeyed America after 9/11, the Americans would have come and done themselves what they told Pakistan to do and Pakistan would have been in the same condition that Iraq and Afghanistan are today (I heard an American radio host in Boston threaten an Indian caller similarly after 9/11 and India at least allowed American helicopters to monitor Kalpakkam and Arundhati Ghosh, India's former nuclear negotiator, said at the time she believed India was in a rollback mode of its nuclear program under American threats). Clearly, Pakistan had no deterrent against the United States. How many nuclear warheads can India launch against the United States and with what delivery vehicles? I have said India needs a minimum of ten thousand strategic nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them. Till it has them, India must not put a single additional reactor under IAEA inspections or safeguards beyond the ones that are already under such inspections and there should be no separation of civilian and military nuclear reactors. And it should never, ever, allow the United States, its number one enemy, with an infinite capacity and inclination for fraud and force, anywhere near its nuclear program. As I have said, when it comes to the United States, especially in nuclear matters, especially in dealings with non-white countries, agreements, laws, treaties, etc. mean nothing; only raw power counts. Among other things, it is planning to have Indian nuclear scientists work under American supervision and control. C.I.A. agent Mukherjee, while lying about India's technological capabilities in the nuclear field and thanking Bush for making proposed Indian dependence and slavery in this field possible, glowingly refers to plans to have Indian nuclear scientists work with American scientists (as a part of India's C.I.A.-controlled press, Hindustan Times in an editorial supporting the nuclear deal a couple days ago said India lacks advanced nuclear technology because Indians can only design and build nuclear reactors upto 220 MW whereas the international norm is 1,000 MW; in fact, India is building reactors upto 650 MW and, while opposing the import of 1,000 MW Russian reactors a few years ago, Indian nuclear scientists said that India's power transmission and distribution grids-- which are not under their control-- cannot handle the output of 1,000 MW reactors; Indian reactor designs are far in advance of American designs). A main purpose of having Indian nuclear scientists work with American scientists is to have them design 'proliferation-resistant' reactors for its Thorium-based power generation program so India cannot get fissile material for weapons from it; in other words, have them cut their own and India's throat. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the Times of India of March 18 '09, K. Subrahmanyam has an article, based on and inspired by my post # 10 above, which refers to the United States' "colonial exploitation" of China for the American consumer with the help of China's "comprador" (which is a term used in Latin America for traitors/collaborators with the enemy) class. But, as I have shown in post # 8 above, other posts in this thread and elsewhere, he is the number one traitor in India who has been the king pin of C.I.A. operations in India for decades. I have said that much of the C.I.A.'s buying of people such as India's army chief, has been done through him. If you see the comments he and the C.I.A. Director, Michael Hayden, posted, which are referred to in my post # 8 above, on an article of mine on Merinews, after intercepting, mutilating and altering the article beyond recognition, he offered to transfer one crore rupees to my account within 48 hours if I would agree to help 'Indo-US relations'. I have said that India will exterminate the population of the United States by 'salting' the territory of the United States with radioactivity and forcing the Americans to eat one another till no one remains alive. Those traitors -- like K. Subrahmanyam -- who flee to the United States will share the Americans' fate.By the way, Advani's recent pledge to make the I.T. (Information Technology) industry in India 'India-centric' if the BJP comes to power is also inspired by what I have said in post # 10 above, which I originally said over a year ago, but that bugger, who, like all Indian politicians, is a beneficiary and participant in the C.I.A.-RAW's crimes against me and against India, also steals what I say while C.I.A.-RAW prevent India's media from reporting the news and views of the greatest living Indian. As I have said, K. Subrahmanyam has been in charge of C.I.A.-RAW's media control also. I have said that Advani's mentor, Vajpayee, has been a life-long agent of first the British then American intelligence agencies and the Kargil war was arranged by the C.I.A. to help him win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence as prime minister. K. Subrahmanyam was the head of the inquiry committee Vajpayee appointed to go into the Kargil war. And, besides making him head of a committee to decide India's long-term strategic goals, Manmohan Singh gave him a "Life-time Achievement Award" at a function attended by all service chiefs, etc. In other words, the C.I.A. decides India's strategic goals.Note that all this (for example, K. Subrahmanyam's offer to transfer one crore rupees to my account within 48 hours; when I did not respond to him, he said it was made 'humorously', upon which the C.I.A. Director, Michael Hayden, said "The C.I.A. has no sense of humor" and K. Subrahmanyam resumed the offer) is out in the open and pointed out to the Indian press through my press releases which passes them on to all the politicians, such as Advani, etc. , to people in government and many others but does not publish or report on them, just as a U.S. State Department official testifying to a U.S. Senate committee that the United States sponsors terrorist and extremist groups in Pakistan has been repeatedly cited in my press releases, besides several threads in this forum and all the Indian politicians, people in government, etc. know about it but none would raise a finger toward the United States, the most ferocious, in fact the only, enemy of both India and Pakistan and these slaves of the white man continue the charade of accusing each other. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It is not just politicians and people in government and the media, etc., who are such slaves of the white man. The same is the case with the public at large; thousands of people at merinews.com saw that article on merinews.com and could see the comments by K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director. This is what I said about Indians' slavery to the white man a couple of years ago:-"The refusal by pieces of filth such as Advani to recognise the United States as India's number one enemy is sustained by thousands of C.I.A.-RAW-inspired headlines in India's media such as "Indian-American becomes Governor of Louisiana" which should instead say "Indian rewarded for conversion to Christianity with governorship: As reward for conversion to Christianity at age 18, as Americans themselves admit and his numerous published essays and articles on his conversion, Indian made Secretary of Louisiana's Health and Hospitals at age 24, President of the University of Louisiana system at age 27, then Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services in Bush Administration, then member of U.S. Congress and now youngest Governor in U.S. at age 36" ( Bobby Jindal: The Story They Don’t Want You to Read CenLamar: On Life in Louisiana ). Even more important are the thousands of headlines that are missing from India's media, thanks to C.I.A.-RAW, the story they really don't want anyone to know, saying "India's greatest scientist and greatest living Indian publicly tortured in Harvard seminar, systematically and totally starved for up to 3 weeks at a time, made semi-starved and homeless and even blind for years, kept under 24-hour audio and video surveillance as well as surveillance of communications and electrical typewriter and computer use, document creation and photocopying, etc., by satellite for more than past 3 decades, systematically harassed and in poverty and neutralised and robbed of his work at the cost of hundreds of millions of dollars per year, robbed of crores in his money and property in India by C.I.A.-RAW, forced back into exile in the U.S., all with full cooperation and participation of India's RAW and India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled prime ministers, politicians and media -- to keep India poor, weak and enslaved: The most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth, a living Incarnation, plans nuclear supremacy for India in near future, to destroy India's number one enemy, the United States, with ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles and will machine gun and bulldoze into trenches all traitors who stand in the way."Indira and Rajiv Gandhi, both agents of the C.I.A. in its crimes against India, met a well-deserved fate. The white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India, was reportedly seen talking to her son, when she wanted to be private in public, in "a language that was not English", presumably in Italian; she has taught him Italian in case she has to flee India and move to Italy; she should move to Italy NOW, with her son and leave India to Indians. Vajpayee, another agent of the C.I.A. which even staged the Kargil war to make him win an election, has removed himself from public life but that will not save him from being machine gunned and bulldozed into a trench along with Manmohan Singh and many others. India's nuclear supremacy will move forward at full speed, without delay.There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man, woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians.The struggle against the nuclear deal is a continuation of the 1857 War of Independence and it must end in nuclear supremacy for India and destruction of India's present day imperialist enemy -- the United States. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India. All these Indians must be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches (a simple test is to ask "Are you for nuclear supremacy for India?"). India's nuclear supremacy must be and will be established. Only then will the War of Independence be won.In an American response to the above two paragraphs (other responses are American officials such as the Treasury Secretary aggressively telling India, in the manner of the East India Company, to totally open up its economy to American investment -- that is, American ownership of India -- and making it "very clear" that India must have no dealings with Iran) a column in the New York Times of October 26 '07 calls Indians doing outsourced work the white man's "external cognitive servants". But Indians are also being turned into the white man's military servants, just as they were under the British, in Mesopotamia in World War I -- as Iraq was called then -- and elsewhere (as I mentioned in a letter below, Manmohan Singh was celebrating millions of Indians serving as Britain's military servants, fighting whoever and wherever the British wanted them to, in WW I and II), as they participate in military exercises such as Yudh Abhyas held in Alaska last month which "was conducted in an 'Iraq-like' environment with Indian and US troops staging a mock attack on an 'Iraqi village' controlled by an insurgent [this is the imperialists' name for Iraqi patriots fighting foreign invaders] group and simulating roadside bombings and suicide attacks" (IANS, N. Delhi, October 26 '07). The white man's Indian servants, whether cognitive or military, prefer to serve white masters rather than India because of higher pay and the advantages of serving the more powerful and the power factor supersedes and encompasses within it the higher pay factor. Indians will not stop being traitors and serving India's imperialist enemies and start serving India unless India acquires nuclear supremacy which is necessary for overcoming the terrorization and subjugation imposed on them by the holocaust perpetrated by the British (the Americans, who have already killed millions out of Iraq's 24 million population, are trying to similarly terrorize and subjugate the Iraqis and, instead of fighting a common enemy with the Iraqis, the white man's Indian servants, already terrorized and subjugated, are preparing to serve the imperialists further). Nuclear supremacy -- which will automatically entail destruction of the imperialist enemy because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy -- must be India's one-point agenda and all those who stand in the way of nuclear supremacy, including the likes of Vajpayee and Advani not just Manmohan Singh, his cabinet and thousands of RAW employees, must be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches.In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. This keeps the remaining troops battle-worthy and able to fight. The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India; Laloo Yadav recently said he held a lathi rally of farmers against American imperialism but he dares not demand anything effective -- lathis cannot defeat American imperialism -- such as ten thousand nuclear-armed missiles capable of reaching the continental United States), for India's nuclear supremacy to go forward."Since I said the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, traitors who are blocking India's independence will be removed by the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ------------------------------------------------------------------ There is an analogy between the lifting of the 'repression' that allows repressed thoughts and feelings to emerge into consciousness in psychotherapy and the problem of lifting the media cover up which keeps the facts of the white man and the most powerful white country, the United States, being India's most ferocious enemy from emerging into the public's consciousness. Lifting of this media cover up will be analogous to lifting of repression in psychotherapy, the patient being the public of India as a whole rather than an individual. Beneficial changes that occur in psychotherapy are often ascribed to the lifting of repression, but the lifting of repression itself is a consequence of changes in the situation that enable the threatening thoughts and feelings to emerge. It is fear, anxiety and such emotions evoked by the repressed thoughts that keep them from emerging into consciousness and it is a change in the situation -- such as the empathy and support of a powerful and respected authority figure, the therapist -- which reduces the fear and anxiety and enables the repressed thoughts to emerge. The bottomless dread of the white man, caused by the incomparable military supremacy over Indians of the British and now the Americans -- note the post above about the United States' view of the people of countries like Iran, India and Pakistan as "These guys are ants ... When the time comes, you crush them" -- and the exercise of their power by the British after 1857, killing over ten million Indians in just the ten years after 1857 (I have cited elesewhere The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:...") which continued right up to 1947 -- is responsible for the 'repression' which is the media cover up of the facts regarding the ferocious enemy that the United States is of India. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will change the situation so that India will be able to use its human and material resources to build a nuclear arsenal to destroy the enemy that is the United States while also lifting the media cover up of the facts which show that India has no greater enemy than the United States.Since the 'repression' is due to fear of the military might of the white man -- the white man's economic advantages are a consequence of his military might which can be used for the economic exploitation of the weak as I have shown above -- the change in the situation has to involve the exercise of military might. At the moment, India has the ability to exercise its nuclear might against the traitors in New Delhi who block the build up of India's nuclear arsenal so it can destroy the enemy that is the United States. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will make possible such build up. I have shown elsewhere how the financial and other wherewithal for such build up is available to India. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today the C.I.A. Director is visiting India. India's colonisation continues apace. As in any war, time is of the utmost importance. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Threats and verbal ‘psy ops’ can accomplish many objectives. If merely verbal measures -- including threats of war -- could deal with all situations, actual war will never be necessary. India’s liberation from the terrorization and subjugation it has been subjected to cannot be accomplished without actual war. The first stage of this war is the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. The second stage is the extermination of the population of the United States. The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum:- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have shown elsewhere that:i) Five thousand nuclear warheads of 200 kilotons each used by India against the United States will have a total yield of one thousand megatons which equals the total yield of just twenty of the fifty megaton hydrogen bomb the Soviet Union once tested.ii) I have said that India will have nuclear supremacy over the United States. An article in 'Foreign Affairs' magazine a couple of years ago said the United States already has or is close to having "nuclear primacy" over Russia -- that is it can destroy all of Russia's nuclear weapons in a first strike without suffering any nuclear detonations on its own territory -- though Russia still has thousands of strategic nuclear warheads. I have said that India's objective will be to exterminate the population of the United States by 'salting' its territory with radioactivity and said "The question is: can the 'salting' of the territory of the United States with radioactivity be done while keeping the regular, explosive nuclear warheads in reserve?” In a situation in which India has nuclear supremacy over the United States, the answer to this question is 'Yes'.iii) I have said "Threats and verbal ‘psy ops’ can accomplish many objectives. If merely verbal measures -- including threats of war -- could deal with all situations, actual war will never be necessary. India’s liberation from the terrorization and subjugation it has been subjected to cannot be accomplished without actual war. The first stage of this war is the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. The second stage is the extermination of the population of the United States." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDED ON MARCH 20, 2009: Thirty five years ago, living in upstate New York, I used to tell other Indians (in 1967, in a graduate dorm at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, a white American called me “ Brown man’s burden”; for those unfamiliar with it, Kipling‘s phrase “the white man‘s burden“ to refer to British colonial rule over India has been used ever since to justify the white man‘s claim of superiority and dominion over non-white people) :- i) “The only place on Earth where the classical culture, of which Greece was one branch, still exists, is rural North India.” ii) “At the height of its Golden Age, the standard of living in Greece was that of a typical Indian village.” iii) [I also used to emphasise that] “The barbarians of Europe were the enemies of the Greeks”. That classical culture no longer exists in Greece. With the advent of television, it is about to be wiped out from India also. But India is going to wipe out the barbarians. So long as vegetarianism exists in India, that culture has not been wiped out. This is what I said in a letter to the press in 2001 (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474-page11.shtml):- “If ever there was a case for a United Nations' military intervention, the destruction of ancient statues in Afghanistan is one. India's government ought to drop paratroops where the destruction is occurring or threatened and send in planes and tanks, as planes and tanks are being used for the destruction. But the United Nations should move whether or not the Indian government does. I have shown elsewhere that India's government and people can accurately be described as "Criminal Blackie Slaves". India's armed forces are among the largest in the world but what are the chances that they have a contingency plan to take control of Afghanistan--a part of traditional India--if necessary (the United States' armed forces have a plan for every contingency)? India's lazy and stupid generals spend their time saluting Criminal Blackie Slaves such as India's prime ministers & each other; hence the necessity of UN intervention. (A news item in the Indian press today says China has said it will not press India and Pakistan to hold talks--because of my reference, below, to the Indian government killing tens of thousands of its own people in self-staged terrorist incidents to be able to say to the White Master it will not hold talks till such incidents stop. Note that the people of Afghanistan & Pakistan as well as Kashmir are Indians forcibly converted by handfuls of invaders--just as Indians were ruled for centuries by a handful of the British from across the seven seas--and now hate Indians for not protecting them. The Taliban's behavior is a variation on the theme of the 'Stockholm Syndrome', like Patty Hearst embracing the cause of the Symbionese Liberation Army. As to what turned India into a land of Patty Hearsts--that has to do with the 175 foot tall statue of Buddha the Taliban is destroying).” The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The C.I.A. person who posted above is not the only C.I.A. person posting here. The same person posts under multiple user names, as do the RAW operatives.After my referring in a 2001 letter (post # 19 above) to 'India's lazy and stupid generals spending their time saluting criminal blackie slaves such as India's prime ministers and each other', India's service chiefs had stopped saluting Vajpayee as prime minister and they used to send junior officers to see him off at the airport where Vajpayee saluted them while they simply shook his hand. That was one of the reasons Vajpayee started referring to me simply as "Pakistan". But, as I have said, a lot more is needed than just stopping saluting the prime minister. Gen. J. J. Singh, a Sikh, started saluting the Sikh prime minister, Manmohan Singh, again. As I have said, Vajpayee has been a life-long agent of first British intelligence agencies and later the C.I.A. and Manmohan Singh was the C.I.A.'s appointee as Finance Minister in P. V. Narasimha Rao's cabinet in 1991, as a column by Ashok Mitra in The Telegraph also pointed out. And India's current chief of the army staff, Deepak Kapoor, has been bought by the United States, as I have pointed out in posts elsewhere (see this thread: India's Army Chief Was In Conspiracy To Sabotage Indian Missile Test ). If you go to the American online newspaper thecurrentonline.com ( http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ), you will see my letter dated December 20, 2001 saying, in part, "Mr. Bush hasbeen citicized for not knowing the nameof the Indian prime minister but that deserved applause because a mind uncluttered with trivia is necessary to focus on the essentials and make good decisions (when I once talked to this prime minister on the telephone, I did not know how to pronounce his name). "Elsewhere I have mentioned how Vajpayee was forced to give up control of India's nuclear weapons and turn it over to the Indian president, K. R. Narayanan, after, in a letter to the press, I expressed doubt about his loyalty and trustworthiness and said how the 1998 nuclear tests were conducted by him on the C.I.A.'s advice, with prior arrangement with the U.S. government because, in a letter to the press in 1998, just before Vajpayee assumed office as prime minister, I wrote, 'India's stupid current prime minister [I. K. Gujral] keeps talking about the necessity for Indians to "inculcate" the scientific spirit in themselves but what the Indians need to inculcate in themselves is hatred for the white man (and woman)', to which Vajpayee replied "Hate is not on the agenda", to which I replied that this amounted to saying "Defence is not on the agenda"..." because, I said, in army training, for example in bayonet practice, you are taught to hate the enemy; it is essential if you are to survive and win. The C.I.A. advised him to conduct the tests to 'neutralise' this. Regarding Vajpayee's party, a news headline today says "BJP disowns Varun, say hate speech not party agenda" : http://ibnlive.in.com/news/bjp-disowns-varun-says-hate-speech-not-party-agenda/88257-37.html But whereas Varun Gandhi is reportedly engaging in hate speech toward Muslims, I have said Indians need to inculcate in themselves "hatred for the white man (and woman)". I explained in a letter many years ago how Indians express hatred toward the erstwhile Muslim conquerors (forgetting that most Muslims of the Subcontinent are not foreign conquerors but Indians converted by the conquerors) because Muslims, domestic or foreign, are no longer powerful but lick the boots of the white man, the current enemy, because they are terrified of the immeasurably greater power of the white man. After one of my posts on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, a RAW employee made a post there referring to me as 'This P a k i nut'. Those who would like to educate themselves should click on the link at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread:-RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADDED ON MARCH 22, 2009: The following is a post I made today on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW:- The loathing, contempt and hostility the Muslims of the Subcontinent may feel for India is fully understandable considering they were Hindus forcibly converted by foreign invaders in a country that has a thousand year history of being over-run by successive waves of invaders from various countries without doing anything effective about it. Conversion is preferable to having your head chopped off and being used to build a tower of heads. It was the pacifism of Buddhism and Jainism that was partly responsible for it and so it is understandable that the Taliban demolished those nearly 200 foot tall statues of Buddha. As for their suppression of women, practically all societies throughout history have suppressed women, denied them education, the right to participate in public life or even go into the public, whether it was Victorian England or the United States where women got the vote only recently after a long struggle. Someone who I knew well lived in a town about 20 miles from Delhi in a very traditional Hindu zamindar family in the heart of India's heartland and had seven sisters. Their father had a science degree from Benares Hindu University. There was a junior high school for girls in town and there was no question of girls being allowed by their grandfather to go out of town to study beyond junior high school (though they could do further studies at home with tutors) whereas the boys could go anywhere and study to whatever level they wanted. Only after the grandfather died were the remaining unmarried girls able to go out of town and get bachelor's and master's degrees as did those already married to a lawyer and a professor. When an uncle, an amateur photographer, of the girls took a marriage photograph of one of the girls and coloured her lips red in the prints, the grandfather was very angry. Purdah has been just as strict in mainstream Hindu society as among Muslims. True, purdah among Hindus is due to the Muslim conquest of India but the point is the Taliban are not doing anything radically different from what Hindus in the Hindu/Hindi heartland have been doing for a thousand years or so. I don't think the Taliban women commit Sati on the funeral pyres of husbands as Hindu women did till recently, as the ultimate expression of female virtue, to be forever worshipped by the public afterwards; nor do their women jump into huge bonfires to kill themselves when the men go out to fight the American or NATO invaders as Hindu women regularly and frequently did to save their honour while their men in Rajasthan tied saffron bands on their heads and went out to fight and die to the last man against the Muslim invaders. This is the stuff of Hindu pride and they were infinitely more glorious than the cowardly slaves in New Delhi of Americans and the white man who dare not arrest and deport American officials who arrived uninvited after the Mumbai attacks and claimed they did not need papers to come and exercise jurisdiction over India. I have shown elsewhere (http://NuclearSupremacyForIndiaOverUS.blogspot.com ) how those ten sons of India, outnumbered a thousand to one in Mumbai, deserve India's highest civilian award -- Bharat Ratna -- for exemplary self-sacrifice and the highest award for valor -- the Param Vir Chakra."Taliban" is plural for Talib which means "student". What can one have against students? Character-wise, they are infinitely superior to the cowardly, degenerate slaves of the white man who constitute the Indian government in New Delhi. As for the intercepted communications between those ten men who, I have said, were targeting India’s enemies and their handlers, there is an inscription in Greece saying “Go tell to Sparta thou that passest by that here obedient to their word we lie” (see Nehru’s ‘Glimpses of World History’). ADDED ON MARCH 25, 2009: The reason India’s armed forces obey criminal traitors like Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh is that RAW has been suppressing India’s real leader for the Americans so that the Indian public does not even know he exists. I said above the army can lift this cover up with its bayonets but the traitor who has been supervising the cover up also bought the army chief, so the only way to do it is with the nuclear destruction of RAW headquarters and North and South Blocks. It is no accident that so many of the traitors through which the Americans control India are South Indians. In the addendum dated December 8, 2008 above, I referred to the American plan to separate north and central India from the south and to treat it as part of the Middle East, because they know they will have no problem controlling the south. Until India destroys the United States, these traitors will be a constant conduit for American control of India. Just before Indira Gandhi’s assassination, she was warned about the danger from her Sikh body guards and she replied how can we claim to be ‘secular’ (?) if they are removed. After Shiv Shankar Menon returned from Washington after finalizing the traitor deal known as the nuclear deal, Jaswant Singh, a former Foreign Minister, loyally congratulated him for a “superb job” of negotiating. A couple days ago, in Singapore, where K. Subrahmanyam’s son has been ambassador and, while ambassador in Singapore, did most of the negotiating of the nuclear deal in Washington, Jaswant Singh said if the BJP comes to power it will not abrogate the nuclear deal and may only make very minor changes while implementing it because otherwise India’s credibility in international agreements will be in jeopardy or some such nonsense. These buggers have no perspective about India’s life and death interests and being ‘loyal’ to their traitor underlings. Has anyone seen any stories in the Indian media about K. Subrahmanyam offering to transfer one crore rupees into my account within 48 hours on behalf of the C.I.A. Director (see above)? Why not? Doesn’t the fact of Americans talking of separating north and central India from the south tell you they know they are the rulers of India and can do anything they want to it? Does this bother anyone? The only Indian who is bothered by American rule over India is the one being suppressed by RAW on behalf of the C.I.A. Does this bother anyone? ADDED ON MARCH 27, 2009: It is no accident that the Indian National Congress, founded by a Britisher, A. O. Hume, was a creation of the British, as a safety valve after the 1857 Mutiny and after the violent ‘pacification’ of India -- see description, above and below, of the holocaust killing over ten million in just the ten years after the Mutiny -- was substantially complete. This creation of the British was later used, through M. K. Gandhi (the Mahatma), to divert Indians into pacifist nonsense -- actually, pacifist poison. I have said repeatedly, above and below, that Jawaharlal Nehru was a lifelong British agent. When I said the same thing about M. K. Gandhi on an online discussion forum some years ago, the abuse was so virulent it was clear Indians were not ready to be enlightened on that yet. Now I find some others are saying what I said, for example, in these posts today on the Bharat-Rakshak on line forum:- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Surinder:) As an aside, I think analyzing this phase of history is critical. One thing that has always struck me when I read the type of disjointed rootless history that we can obtain in India is that despite the fact that MKG supposedly fought to end British rule in India, his actions had an uncanny outcome: they seemed to help the British, or hurt them very very minimally. Even when Tilak etc. had asked for Complete Swaraj, MKG was proudly proclaiming his allegience to the British. He seems to have been jailed just enough to make him a leader. (just enough to give him credibility to the masses, but not severly enough to break his spirit.) The type of soul-sapping incarcerations of Guru Ram Singh, Savarkar, Tilak were not meted out to him. His wasn't sent out to Kalapani in Andamans, Burma, or Singapore. He was not lathi charged like Lajpat Rai, nor liquidated like Bhagat Singh. He never met with any accident, or any desease or any assasinations by others (pre-1947). If anything, his hold on the INC seems guided and facilitated. Despite fighting the British or wearing the loin cloth, there is an unmistakable sense of MKG looking up to and being intimidated of the British. At no point did MKG stood up and challenged the basic right of the British to be here in India. He, as you said, played by the rules. He did not proclaim that British were persona non grate in India. He never seemed to have challenged the very right of British to be here; he seemed happy with the role of a supplicant to the British court.Then you couple this with some puzzling bizzarre things like Caliphate movement, support of JLN, opposition to Bose & Bhagat Singh. (with Bhagat Singh, there is some prevarication he indulges in.) He does not take a cue from Bhagat Singh or Bose that they did not even recognize the British right be in India. While he comes out as fanatically non-violent, his support for WW-1 & 2 is puzzling to say the least.Coming back to his support for JLN; it seems irrational. Gandhi is dhoti clad devout ascetic brahmchari Hindu; JLN is an upper class pseudo-English almost-Muslim-in-taste athiest who has an affair with Mountbatten's wife. They could not be more different. Patel, if anything, was closer to him in tastes and likes and dislikes. Not to mention that MKG's support for Muslim causes and his fasts for releasing funds to Pakistan are exactly in line with the British support for the Pakistanis & Muslims. It is as if British are directling a show ... they direct Jinnah to some acts, then direct MKG to do things ... all of this ends up as a big pathway for TSP's formation.I hate to say it, but looking at all the disparate bizzarre events it seems to be as if MKG himself might have been an agent of the British themselves. Maybe paid, maybe unpaid, maybe just manipulated. I certainly don't have proof, but if proof came it would not seem outlandish to me. There seem to be too many winks and nods of him with the British. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Rahul Mehta:) 1. Britishers also helped Mohanbhai by ensuring that ToI gives a lot of coverage to Mohanbhai. More the publicity, the youth will fall in love without even understanding what vision he has, if at all he has any vision. 2. Mohanbhia's dukaan of Satya, Ahimsa, Khaadi needed huge subsidies round the clock. The youth would spin charkhaa and produce Khaadi which was garbage. Its sale value was below the cost !! And so huge subsidy was needed to support charkhaa spinning. And bhajan singing also needed subsidies. The cash came from elitemen such as Bajaj and Birla. If Viceroy had just made a phone call and threatened Bajaj et al not pay a dime to Mohanbhai, the Mohanbhai's dukaan would gone bankrupt. IOW, British allowed Birla et al to fund Mohanbhai's Satya, Ahimsa, Khaadi dukaan. 3. Why did Britishers let Birla et al fund Mohanbhai? Because if Mohanbhai's dukaan selling Ahimsa and Satya were to close, the charkha spinning and bhajan singing youth would start looking for alternatives. There was no youtube or BR back then to keep the restless Indian youth busy . So if Mohanbhai's dukaan were to close, some of the youth might have started opting for Bhagatji's ways and means to get freedom, which would have increased British casualties to a point that Brits may be forced to leave India without getting chance of shaping new India.So Mohanbhai was keeping the youth busy by making them spin charkha, sing bhajans etc rather than teach them weapon use. There by, Mohanbhai was preventing youth from becoming followers of Bhagatji. So Britishers helped Mohanbhai by asking ToI to print photo of Mohanbhai everyday and let Indian elitemen fund the dukaan of Mohanbhai. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Surinder: ) Rahul Mehta, Interesting points. What you say only adds to the points I raised. I want to add one more thing: British, for all their faults, are very pragmatic people. This quality allows them to manage conflicts and problems with least cost. Mind you, I did not way "wise", for if they were they would not be enslaving 1/4th of humanity to enhance their standard of living. Americans also have this uncanny pragmatic side.Now they quite very well understood that some escape valve is needed in India. So they formed the Congress Party, started by a Britisher, of all people. This is party is encouraged to be the sole speaker of Indians. Its leaders are British educated pseudo-Brits, with English tastes and sensibilities, but not the British war-like fighting spirit. They were all people who had not ability to wage physical war, even if their life depended on it. Few of them were sons of the soil. British pragmatism meant that they understood that the leaders cannot be viewed as complete lackeys (that will destroy their credibility), so they were given light sentences, they were "honored" with frequent meetings with British. I mean what are the chances that Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Bose, Azad would be granted a meeting and Britain would be seen negotiating with them?None of its preferred leaders like Gandhi, JLN etc. are lathi-charged like Lala Lajpat Rai, or shot like those in Jallianwal Bagh, or shot like Azad. None of them are sent to 10 years rigorous imprisonments like Savarkar and countless others. These led by Gandhi propose a strategy to fight freedom which is unique in human history: they felt quite comfortable in the role of supplicants (beggers if you will) in the court of the British. JLN had an affair with the wife of the person he is supposedly negotiating. (Talk about Conflict of Interest!!!). If the British truly wanted to get rid of JLN, Gandhi etc., there are numerous ways: small accidents, auto accidents, mysterious illnesses, family feuds, riots where they could be eliminated. The most bizzarre, and in my opinion the most revealing, is the amazing coincidence of Gandhi supporting both World Wars (which were British do or die wars).You mention TOI, who owned it at that time?You mentioned Birla. This is also interesting. There is no way Brila would make money if the British were angry with him. They could liquidate him in no time, if they wished. The fact that they let him finance Gandhi is highly suspect.All this, of course had enormous implications for India. It still does. This set up the tone of the nation after independence too. The progeny of JLN still rules India and lives in the best addresses in India with no known source of income. The family of Bose, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev lives in penury.Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Rahul Mehta:) Thanks . And pls note -- whatever I have thought, derived and said in all threads in all posts till date is trivial and obvious. The only non-trivial and unobvious thing that always comes to my mind is -- why others before me did not think of all this?--- Abhi_G wrote: Rahul Mehta ji thanks for the business angle.It would be nice to know the role of the native business houses in those times. If the indigenous business houses were funding the INC, then the tacit understanding of not having a war/unrest inside the country does have some value. Although, that line of logic fails completely, when the nation faces threats of complete annihilation. If the survival of the state is paramount, there are no second chances but to have war. Was the INC committed to the preservation of the native business interests in the pre-independence period that propelled them to make compromises? Although it seems that post independence, their policies completely changed and Indian industries suffered right until the 90s.Welcome . And now we are coming to REAL juice --- analyzing role of Indian elitemen back then. Many times we all blame Mohanbhai for doing this or not doing that. We forget that Mohanbhai was dependent on ToI and other mediamen for fame and he was dependent on Indian elitemen for funds. And without fame and funds, Mohanbhai was zero. So he could not have taken steps that would have resulted in drastic loss of support of elitemen or media-owners. So many steps he took, that we now dislike, was due to the Mohanbhai's dependence on funds and mediamen. eg He cooked up garbage called "trusteeship of private property". Was he on weeds? NO. He cooked this garbage so that gullible volunteers can be misguided and elitemen can be happy. And why Mohanbhai did NOT ask British to spare Bhagatji? Because Indian elitemen and British did not want Bhagatji alive. So important was elitemen's support, that Subhashji had to leave India. Because he could see that no Indian elitemen is willing to support him and all of them are willing to support Mohanbhai. The Indian elitemen too did not have any choice --- one flick of viceroy's pen and they would go from riches to rags. So the Indian elitemen back then danced as per the British tune. The Congress leaders danced as per the elitemen's tune.British created INC to misguide Indians as far as possible. The leaders were promoted or demoted via Indian elitemen, who had no choice but to act as per British wish. So much of the Congress was a British show. To give some legitimacy, elections were held inside Congress, to make workers feel important. But the elitemen and their money decided who will get opportunity to campaign and so mostly, elitemen had their say. Sometimes, elitemen would fail to control election, and unmanageable person like Subhajee would rise. In that case, Mohanbhai would use his de-facto veto to bring the Congress back in British line.----------- surinder wrote: Rahul Mehta, Interesting points. What you say only adds to the points I raised. I want to add one more thing: British, for all their faults, are very pragmatic people. This quality allows them to manage conflicts and problems with least cost. Mind you, I did not way "wise", for if they were they would not be enslaving 1/4th of humanity to enhance their standard of living. Americans also have this uncanny pragmatic side. Now they quite very well understood that some escape valve is needed in India. So they formed the Congress Party, started by a Britisher, of all people. This is party is encouraged to be the sole speaker of Indians. Its leaders are British educated pseudo-Brits, with English tastes and sensibilities, but not the British war-like fighting spirit. They were all people who had not ability to wage physical war, even if their life depended on it. Few of them were sons of the soil. British pragmatism meant that they understood that the leaders cannot be viewed as complete lackeys (that will destroy their credibility), so they were given light sentences, they were "honored" with frequent meetings with British. I mean what are the chances that Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Bose, Azad would be granted a meeting and Britain would be seen negotiating with them?None of its preferred leaders like Gandhi, JLN etc. are lathi-charged like Lala Lajpat Rai, or shot like those in Jallianwal Bagh, or shot like Azad. None of them are sent to 10 years rigorous imprisonments like Savarkar and countless others. These led by Gandhi propose a strategy to fight freedom which is unique in human history: they felt quite comfortable in the role of supplicants (beggers if you will) in the court of the British. JLN had an affair with the wife of the person he is supposedly negotiating. (Talk about Conflict of Interest!!!). If the British truly wanted to get rid of JLN, Gandhi etc., there are numerous ways: small accidents, auto accidents, mysterious illnesses, family feuds, riots where they could be eliminated. The most bizzarre, and in my opinion the most revealing, is the amazing coincidence of Gandhi supporting both World Wars (which were British do or die wars).You mention TOI, who owned it at that time?You mentioned Birla. This is also interesting. There is no way Brila would make money if the British were angry with him. They could liquidate him in no time, if they wished. The fact that they let him finance Gandhi is highly suspect.All this, of course had enormous implications for India. It still does. This set up the tone of the nation after independence too. The progeny of JLN still rules India and lives in the best addresses in India with no known source of income. The family of Bose, Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev lives in penury. Thanks.ToI was owned by British company - Bennett and Colemen. Now it is owned by Indians, who AFAIT, are puppets of Americans. I have bolded some sentences from your posts. And they are very very important.British formed Congress to misguide Indians along with creating a safety value. Except one or two, everyone in Congress was Indian, and so Indians would think as "one of us". But elitemen funded the leaders British decide and so British were deciding the leaders in Congress to a considerable extent. The leaders knew the importance of the elitemen's support and so obeyed them and so thus, they did what British wanted.British could have resorted to brute force, but that would make angry Indians join Germans or French or Russians en-masse. So they did not have choice of using brute force en-masse. So they took this way of misguiding Indians via Congress. All this is relevant even today. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Of course, now I know that those abusers -- when I referred to M. K. Gandhi as a lifelong British agent, like Nehru -- were RAW people. A headline in RAW-mouthpiece Times of India says “Opposition made Varun a poster boy: Advani”. RAW is still promoting the Nehru family (see posts above about the role of Times of India coverage in making M. K. Gandhi and Nehru poster boys) at the expense of India. Is there any comparison between the value of Satish Chandra and Varun Gandhi respectively for India? This is what I wrote below on January 10, 2008:- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to the post office that serves the area where a lot of politicians live, the AIDS woman (Sonia) gets over 50,000 letters per month. Manmohan Singh and Advani get less than 2,500 each. Vajpayee, when prime minister, got less than 1,000. The sole reason for this is that she is white. The terrorization and subjugation to the white man that Indians underwent through the holocaust perpetrated by the British after 1857, killing over 10 million in 10 years (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ), is responsible for this fact. The result is the inferior Indian niggers, criminal blackie slaves -- unfit even to be made into dog food -- that the Indians named Chetan and Nikhil who have posted comments here exemplify. Nigger blackie slaves like these were blown by the British from the mouths of cannons. Do you think they would have dared to call the British any such names? They are unfit even to be made into dogfood but they can be ground up and made into fertiliser, to grow onions, stinking onions. The most intelligent, most handsome man on Earth, whose toe nail clippings are worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion plus Indians combined, does not get even one letter. A report in The Telegraph of January 10, 2008 says “Sonia....looked pale but the dimples were in place“. No reporters were allowed in her room; how did he know “the dimples were in place“? Like all the other Indian niggers, this bugger would like to dive under her petticoats (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ) when he is not dreaming of her dimples (this ugly piece of dog-faeces has dimples-- so what? Well, he will answer: SHE IS WHITE!!!!!!!). Vajpayee 'withdrew' as BJP's prime ministerial candidate because of my disclosures that he is a life-long agent of first the British then the C.I.A., that the C.I.A. staged the Kargil war to make him win the election that was pending, etc. (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/). So, grateful to be the BJP's traitor-in-chief after Vajpayee, Advani wrote the current traitor-in-office Manmohan Singh (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/ ) asking him to give Vajpayee a Bharat Ratna. Instead, all of them (Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh, Advani) should be split in two lengthwise with an axe on three successive days, their two halves hollowed out, then the AIDS woman should be asked to defecate in their hollowed out torsoes on the three successive days. Before they are split in two, they should be allowed a last wish -- specify what the AIDS woman should eat the day before she defecates in their hollowed out torsoes; they can specify chicken or daal roti or whatever. After sewing the two halves shut, the torsoes should be roasted, sliced into thin slices and served with tea to all the RAW employees as a Republic Day-eve treat. And don't forget to let cabinet ministers Manishankar Aiyar, Health Minister Ramadoss and Science and Technology Minister Sibal, who sit at C.I.A.-supplied terminals to participate in crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, partake of the treat (roasted traitor-torsoes stuffed with dog-faeces). Like all the RAW employees, these criminals will be machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches, which will also be the actual punishment of Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh and Advani along with other politicians (see my blog cited above in this paragraph). After I posted the above, RAW decided that the Bharat Ratna will not go to any politician but to some “renowned” person in some other field. But the Indian whose accomplishments exceed the combined accomplishments of all other Indians is unknown to the public due to the crimes against him by C.I.A.-RAW (see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/). RAW is just nigger blackie slaves of the Americans. Only India's nuclear supremacy over the United States and the death of three hundred million American enemies (see my blog cited earlier in this paragraph) will bring him recognition (not that he gives a fig for recognition by criminal blackie slaves or their soon to be vapourised white masters; well, not all will be vapourised; many will be irradiated and eaten by their compatriots who in turn will be eaten by their other compatriots till no one remains alive). George Bush Sr. said before the first invasion of Iraq that he wanted to restore America's “credibility“ in the Middle East; his son did that with the pictures of Saddam Hussein hanging from a rope, his neck broken. B. F. Skinner, whose plagiarism I exposed ( see my web page, http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/ ), with the help of the C.I.A., the American government and media and all Americans, successfully got the cooperation of Indian blackie slaves -- India's government, not just RAW, politicians, cabinet ministers, media, etc. -- in the most heinous crimes against the greatest living Indian. Shifting from open hostility and abuse from their Indian lackeys to “Sirjee“, etc., or various equivalents of 'honey traps', is not going to save them from being machine gunned and bulldozed into trenches. And Bush Sr. may no longer be around to be eaten by his compatriots but Bush Jr. certainly will be. Boy, are the Americans going to have fun! You can depend on it. C.I.A.-RAW (India's Research and Analysis Wing which functions as an arm of the C.I.A. against India; see my blog http://satishchandraletterstopress.blogspot.com/) controls access to and the number of hits made or shown on my blogs as part of its ongoing crimes against India and the greatest living Indian for the past 31 years. If you visit my blog, sign the register (as a comment) so I know. For the solution to India's problem that is the white man, click on my blog's URL in the above paragraph. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, they will die in the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ADDED ON MARCH 31, 2009: Varun Gandhi reportedly engaged in “hate speech”. According to a report (IANS in Times of India, March 31, 2009, Internet) he said “If somebody lifts a hand against Hindus, or thinks they are weak, (that) there is nobody behind them, then I swear on the (Bhagvad) Gita that I will cut off that hand…”. This is not hate speech at all. To say that “If somebody lifts a hand against Hindus … I will cut off that hand” is a pledge to defend against an aggressor. He does not name any particular aggressor individual or group but he could have and it would still not be hate speech. Any one in law enforcement, the judiciary or the Election Commission who says it is hate speech deserves to be whipped. A Supreme Court judge named Katju engaged in a display of irrational hatred toward Muslims within the past day or so when he said he will not allow “Talibanisation” of India in an appeal by a Muslim student in a “convent” school who has been denied the right to grow a beard by the school and by the lower courts. It would have been “Talibanisation” if that student wanted to impose the requirement of growing a beard on all other males in the school. His lawyer correctly argued that Sikhs have the right to grow beards, though there are many Sikhs who choose to be clean-shaven. If that Muslim student feels he should have a beard on religious grounds, that is his right. The “convent” school is the Talibanising agency imposing the requirement of being clean-shaven on everyone. The judge engaged in grossly incompetent behaviour based on a political or religious prejudice or loyalty to an alien subversive agency -- the “convent’ school. From what I know of what goes on, not just during ragging/hazing but otherwise, in women’s colleges in India -- whether Miranda House of Delhi or Isabella Thoburn College of Lucknow, etc. -- fully justifies the ‘Taliban’ Hindu grandfather above refusing to let girls study out of town. A girl who went to college in Lucknow after the grandfather’s death not only returned home on her own within months, but later died from breast cancer -- unprecedented in that part of India -- due to oral contraceptive use -- according to modern, ‘liberal’ values -- while married to a doctor. The Supreme Court has barred Sanjay Dutt from contesting elections because of his conviction in the 1993 Mumbai blast case. But those blasts were arranged by C.I.A.-RAW, like all such incidents in India -- as I have shown, RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A., for example in K. Subrahmanyam offering to transfer one crore rupees into my account within 48 hours on behalf of the C.I.A. Director if I keep quiet about it -- and the criminals of the Supreme Court have not only covered up my case, described below, about it but pretended to have lost an earlier case after it was duly filed and registered, as reported under a banner front page headline by a New York newspaper because of which its Editor-Publisher was jailed for several years by C.I.A.-RAW, as I have described below. All the judges of the Supreme Court deserve to be whipped and hanged as well. It was to ‘neutralise’ what I have said about the Taliban (see above) that C.I.A.-RAW arranged for the recent attack on the police academy in Lahore. The U.S. government does not keep its sponsorship of terrorism in the subcontinent a secret. Mitchell Shivers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Asian & Pacific Security Affairs, gave the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 25 June 2008: ".... elements of extremism and terrorism are at work within Pakistan sponsored by the usa and India." ( http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/11/17/pakistan-the-next-us-target ). The same is the case with terrorism in India. But sponsorship of terrorism is the least of what the United States does against India (see http://WhatYouShouldKnowAboutRAW.blogspot.com and http://NuclearSupremacyForIndiaOverUS.blogspot.com ). There are also charges under the National Security Act against Varun Gandhi. He was going to “court arrest”, which is a peaceful Gandhian practice and this was the BJP’s peaceful plan. The plan changed immediately after my comments above about M. K. Gandhi and “pacifist nonsense” and “pacifist poison”. (See letter dated May 15, 2004 below for who is India’s “Rashtrapita” and is being suppressed by traitors collaborating with the C.I.A. and the Press Release of August 14, 2008 below for who is India’s sovereign). Not all violence, even violence against the police, endangers national security. What IS the gravest danger to national security is the nuclear deal. Anyone in any way connected with the nuclear deal must be arrested under the National Security Act; any member of the Nehru family who comes to campaign in his or her constituency such as Rae Bareilly or Amethi in Uttar Pradesh must be arrested under the National Security Act; not to do so will be the gravest dereliction of duty. ADDED ON APRIL 2, 2009: These are posts I made on the blog of Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, today: -------------------------------------------------------------------- India has imported three VIP jets from the United States for use of its president, prime minister and others. In view of what I have said [Press Release dated October 24, 2008 below] about the United States' ability to disable electronic equipment by signals from satellites, this is terminally stupid. This is the kind of thing because of which Americans think of Indians and such as "ants" [March 18, 2009 above] who they can crush when they choose. This is how a report in the Times of India celebrates this stupidity:-India's Air Force One takes off with President on board2 Apr 2009, 0000 hrs IST, TNN NEW DELHI: Amid chanting of mantras, breaking of coconuts and a tilak ceremony, the desi Air Force One took to the skies on its inaugural VVIP flight on Wednesday, with President Pratibha Patil heading for Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. IAF's three new Business Boeing Jets are, of course, not as large, plush or technically sophisticated as US President's Air Force One. Unlike Barack Obama's aircraft, which can fly halfway around the world without refuelling, the Indian version's range is limited to only 3,000 nautical miles. Moreover, the desi Air Force One certainly does not have what Obama's "Flying Oval Office'' is also believed to carry: An escape pod or capsule to take the US President out of harm's way if the plane itself is hijacked. Nevertheless, the three aircraft -- christened Rajdhoot, Rajhans and Rajkamal -- formally inducted on Wednesday will ensure the Indian President and Prime Minister will now travel in fully secure comfort like never before. The aircraft, after all, are equipped with high-tech self-protection suites (SPS) to tackle incoming "hostile'' missiles or other airborne threats, as also encrypted satellite communication facilities and advanced navigation aids. While the three VVIP jets in themselves came for Rs 734 crore, another Rs 202.93 crore was spent on equipping them with SPS ordered directly through the US government. The President or PM will have an executive office and bedroom to themselves on board, apart from a secure communication chamber and facilities to host around 50 guests in the specially-configured aircraft. "Trips will now be more business-like. We will get more time to study, concentrate and apply our minds as the flight will be more smooth,'' said Patil, just before taking off for the North-East. IAF chief Air Chief Marshal Fali Homi Major, in turn, stepped in to dispel the controversy over whether US inspectors will be periodically allowed to physically inspect the aircraft under the end-use monitoring agreement (EUMA) with US. "Those issues have been sorted out. It (EUMA) is not for the aircraft, but for the systems in it. That is why the aircraft is flying now. There will be no physical verification,'' he said. Asked about the comparison with the US Air Force One, ACM Major said, "In these aircraft too, there are several features which exist in Air Force One. We don't have some features. But for our requirements, I think, we have the necessary equipment on board. It will be more than fair to call them the Indian Air Force One.'' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A PTI report in the Times of India is headed "Thanks to Obama, India will have a say in Afghanistan". This headline says it all about the nigger blackie slaves that Indians are of the white master; they need permission of the white master to be involved in a part of traditional India. I have said it is India's responsibility to militarily eject the United States from Afghanistan.-------------------------------------------------------------------------Thanks to Obama, India will now have a say in Afghanistan2 Apr 2009, 0900 hrs IST, PTI WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama has ended years of "veto power" wielded by Pakistan in Afghanistan over India's active involvement in the country post-Taliban, a US expert on South Asia has said. Because of Pakistan's stiff resistance and opposition to involve India in any way in Afghanistan that the Bush administration was literally prevented to take any move to include New Delhi as part of its regional strategy on Afghanistan, Deepa Ollapally, associate director of George Washington University's Sigur Center for Asian Studies, said in a Congressional testimony on Afghanistan. "So far, the US government has refrained from including India in regional political efforts in Afghanistan, basically bending to Pakistan's sentiments. India has obviously not been happy with this state of affairs, but it has pushed ahead with development assistance instead," she said in her testimony before the national security and foreign affairs subcommittee of the House Oversight and government reform committee. "The new plan that was announced (by Obama) on Friday (March 27), which will include an international contact group which will have India involved, I think is a step in the right direction," she said. "The current strategy, which has been to allow Pakistan veto power over India's involvement in formulating regional solutions to the Afghan crisis is not working and frankly rewards Pakistan for its behaviour so far," she said. Previously she directed the South Asia Program at the US Institute of Peace, was an associate professor of political science at Swarthmore College, and headed the international strategic studies unit at the national institute for advanced studies in Bangalore. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:- -------------------------------------------------------------------- This is far from being one of the most injurious things the United States has done to India, but there have been references in the Indian press to India's failure to sell the Brahmos missile, for which Russia supplies the missile and India the guidance system, to other countries being due to Russia steeply increasing the price of the missile recently because of which it has become a little too expensive even for India's armed forces. But the steep price increase by the Russians was at the instigation of the United States. This is what an American, "gpit", on this board said in my thread about the Indian army chief, bought by the U.S., participating in the sabotage of a Brahmos test in January:"Not sure about this particular event, but it is broadly rumored that US doesn’t like Brahmos, because this is a soviet technology aiming particularly at US AC. It is also rumored that US exercises its clout such that nobody dares to buy the weapon. This, among some other reasons (such as price), causes the total failure of India’s international marketing efforts for this weapon."I have always held India should have NO IMPORTS and NO COLLABORATIONS with other countries for the weapons it uses and, instead, should increase the money and manpower in indigenous defense research and development at least tenfold now, with further increases later. Even for supposedly indigenous systems, India imports a lot of components; it should invest further so it does not have to import any components either. This is what I said in a letter to the press over 5 years ago [see letter dated January 5, 2004 below].Regarding my proposal about money, an article in The Asian Age a couple days ago asked "Why is India asking for $5bn from World Bank?" and said that while countries all over the world are printing money with abandon, India is still taking loans from the World Bank and IMF. The answer is that Indian government traitors on the C.I.A.'s payroll want to keep India under American control. Right after Gen. Musharraf staged his coup and became the ruler of Pakistan, I suggested in a letter to the press he apply my proposal about money to Pakistan and wrote "Of course, this will force the cockroaches of the Indian government to emulate Pakistan or perish". His response was that it was only theoretical. In fact it is the most practical thing in the world . … Well, Pakistan also is still taking "aid" from the United States. And news from the G-20 summit says Manmohan Singh has demanded 500 billion dollars in 'aid' from 'rich' counties like the United States to 'poor' countries like India. And another report says “leaders at the G-20 summit have agreed to give $1 trillion to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank to help struggling nations around the world.” Regarding the peril in importing any kind of electronic equipment from the United States (the peril in using its GPS system, etc., was shown in the U.S. switching off the GPS signal to the region when India tested the Brahmos missile on January 20, causing the missile to miss its target), [see Press Release dated October 24, 2008 below]. After I wrote the above about printing money vs. getting loans and ‘aid‘, RAW ordered Manmohan Singh to make India among the 20 ‘rich’ countries which will be pumping $1 trillion into the IMF and World Bank to “to help struggling nations around the world” -- RAW interrupted my computer use, replacing the story on my screen with another story, via the American satellites C.I.A.-RAW use for electronically monitoring me, to bring this to my attention -- and a photograph shows the very crestfallen, scowling faces of Manmohan Singh and Montek Singh Ahluwalia at the G-20 summit. In my letter to the press dated February 11, 2004, below, I wrote :- "China has adopted my proposal about money (see below). Also, within less than a week of my letter dated January 5, 2004, China announced plans for a manned landing on the moon by 2010. When Pakistan's current President came to power, I suggested in a letter to the press that my proposal about money be the centre-piece of Pakistan's new national policies, adding "Of course, this will force the cockroaches of the Indian government to emulate Pakistan or perish". Now the situation is that the monkeys of the American government must emulate China or perish. In response, to reduce China's motivation to develop its own technology, the United States has prompted the countries of the European Community to lift technology sanctions imposed on China-- a move that will not succeed. Also, as a first step, Bush has jacked-up the deficit for the upcoming budget to $521 billion. As a second step, he has proposed pumping trillions of dollars into the U.S. economy by putting the money into privatised Social Security accounts, raising the 'National Debt' for this purpose." After I referred to China applying my proposal about money, it stopped doing that. As I have pointed out (see addendum of December 12 ’06 to January 9 ’07 below ), like India's traitor-rulers, China's rulers are also allowing the Americans to use China's population as slave labour in exchange for the United States letting members of China's traitor-collaborator class take part in proceeds from the rape of their country and immigrate to the U.S., etc. The terminal stupidity on display in buying the three VIP jets (above) from the United States extends to all other areas. A headline says “Resurgent India bats for developing nations at G-20”. This is like the “Resurgent India” slogan of the BJP government after the 1998 nuclear tests. I have said “with a nuclear bomb killing a few million of these stupid Indians in Delhi/New Delhi, India as a whole can be saved…” (Press Release dated August 14, 2008 below). This is the truth. I have shown (addendum of December 12 ‘06 to January 9 ‘07 below) that most of the vaunted 9% GDP growth rate for India in recent years is bogus, cannot properly be called a part of India’s economic growth and harms instead of benefiting India. Insofar as the slowdown in India is due to the slowdown in the U.S. economy, it is good for India and the bogus, harmful growth can be replaced by genuine growth of the Indian economy. The more India delinks its economy from those of the ‘advanced’ countries such as the United States -- which is dealing with the symptoms rather than the cause of its depressed economy -- the better for India. The cause of the slowdown in India’s economy has nothing in common with the cause of the slowdown in the U.S. economy. Participating in international bodies (a headline in the Times of India says “India now member of two key bodies: PM: … the Financial Stability Forum and the Basle Committee on banking supervision”) is a harmful distraction which will keep India from doing what it can in fact do for its economy. I have said India can very quickly overtake the United States not just militarily but economically as well. Both the military and economic objectives require delinking from the United States. The traitor-collaborator class will resist this delinking and has to be dealt with by military-nuclear means. ADDED ON APRIL 6, 2009: This is from a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- On March 25 '09 [above] I said the following:-"It is no accident that so many of the traitors through which the Americans control India are South Indians. [On December 8, 2008, above], I referred to the American plan to separate north and central India from the south and to treat it as part of the Middle East, because they know they will have no problem controlling the south. Until India destroys the United States, these traitors will be a constant conduit for American control of India.Just before Indira Gandhi’s assassination, she was warned about the danger from her Sikh body guards and she replied how can we claim to be ‘secular’ (?) if they are removed. After Shiv Shankar Menon returned from Washington after finalizing the traitor deal known as the nuclear deal, Jaswant Singh, a former Foreign Minister, loyally congratulated him for a “superb job” of negotiating. A couple days ago, in Singapore, where K. Subrahmanyam’s son has been ambassador and, while ambassador in Singapore, did most of the negotiating of the nuclear deal in Washington, Jaswant Singh said if the BJP comes to power it will not abrogate the nuclear deal and may only make very minor changes while implementing it because otherwise India’s credibility in international agreements will be in jeopardy or some such nonsense. These buggers have no perspective about India’s life and death interests and being ‘loyal’ to their traitor underlings."An example of this is the Americans getting access to technological secrets of the Brahmos missile (see … above for how the Americans consider the Brahmos missile to be specifically directed at them) via the head of the Brahmos program named Pillai, a south Indian with very Negroid features, by having him 'help' the Americans against the Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) that have been the Iraqi patriots' main weapon -- the only successful weapon -- against the American invaders. A post on an Indian defence forum says "Dr. Pillai is a very well respected name in International Military Circle. This man has been frequently consulted by Petagon, JIEDDO for providing input on fight against IEDs that were decimating US forces in Iraq". Whether or not it is due to Pillai's help, American casualties in Iraq have dropped to a negligible level. Why is this Indian government scientist working for India's and Iraq's imperialist enemy?By the way, Negroid or Aryan, features of brown-skinned people are no guide to their behaviour because of the complex way genetics works; all brown people of the Indian subcontinent have both Aryan and Dravidian genes. The traitor Shiv Shankar Menon referred to above has sharp features. The very concept of 'genes' as it exists is highly problematic. Psychologist Carl Jung pointed out that Europeans who moved to North America have within very few generations and with no admixture of blood acquired some physical features of native Americans. I would add behavioral characteristics as well; the 'soul' which enters a child's body with the first breath is from among the souls that are around locally and brings with it its entire history, including behavioral characteristics and behavior can change genes as genes can change behavior. The anatomy and physical characteristics of an organism are not separate from its behaviour and both are affected by both heredity and environment. This is also the foundation of American insistence that only a U.S.-born citizen can be president of their country.The objective of seeking 'help' from people like Pillai above -- regardless of whether they are north or south Indian -- is first and foremost to establish contact with Indians in crucial areas because establishing contact is a necessary prerequisite to bribing them, buying other people through them and subverting in various ways India's defences, economy, etc. Jasjit Singh, a retired Air Commodore who was head of the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) after traitor K. Subrahmanyam through whom the Americans bought India's army chief and many others ( all heads of IDSA have been U.S. intelligence agents; Vikram Sood, former head of RAW, currently works for a Russian intelligence gathering organization in Delhi -- which is the center of Russian intelligence gathering in India -- as does the former army chief, V. P. Malik; the organization is funded through an Indian industrialist) once wrote, in support of continuing U. S.-India joint air exercises, how Indian pilots had bested American pilots in a joint exercise. I pointed out that the American pilots were instructed to let Indian pilots win precisely so they will feel good about such joint exercises -- which serve to draw India into the American orbit -- and continue them. More recently, a video on an Indian defence forum showed American air force officers making fun of and laughing at the stupidity and incompetence of Indian pilots after a joint exercise held in the U.S. More deadly is the stupidity of India’s air force chief (above) endorsing the import of VIP jets or anything else. Indians are no more than children and India is in a war for survival which it cannot win without an adult in charge. But Indians have not the intelligence to stop suppressing him as they are doing under instructions from India’s enemies. Children are told not to talk to strangers. Indians’ child-like behavior toward the white man is due to the terrorization and subjugation they have undergone at the hands of the British in the holocaust I have described below. Its effects cannot be reversed without imposing a greater holocaust on the white man.I have referred [below] to a phenomenon I called "the bribery of contact". That is why independent and autonomous countries like North Korea, as well as the Soviet Union, have strenuously avoided contact with the West. KGB agents posted abroad necessarily had contact with the West and by bringing large sections of the KGB on its payroll, the C.I.A. brought down the Soviet Union, as I have described elsewhere [below]. When I wrote about this, George W. Bush as president went to the C.I.A. headquarters to quietly pay tribute to the C.I.A. specifically about this. North Korea's current leader is not only fond of French wines but, through television, a great fan of an American basketball star because of which a U.S. Secretary of State once presented an autographed basket ball or something like that to him from that athlete and these are reasons why North Korea surrendered to the United States and agreed to dismantle its nuclear weapons program. Indians’ pacifism is related to the indifference to material goods and emphasis on spiritual goals they are taught. Indians have to move to militarism in order to be economically prosperous. The goal of “development” that is so popular is a goal of economic prosperity but those who advocate “development” stupidly don’t advocate militarism. Militarism means nuclear supremacy over the most powerful country today -- the United States -- not over Pakistan and China. All India has to emphasize, in thought, speech and action, is nuclear supremacy over the United States; “development” and prosperity will automatically follow. Because of the aggressiveness of the United States, India has no other option. India changed from being the most prosperous nation in the world (see Macaulay above) to being the most poor because it lost the 1857 War of Independence against the British. It has to militarily wage and win a Second War of Independence against the United States -- which has replaced Britain -- in order to be prosperous. Independence equals being militarily independent. It is not Militarism, just Independence. It cannot be attained without war. ADDED ON APRIL 8, 2008: By entertaining visits of Americans like Holbrooke and Mullen, the children in New Delhi are acquiescing in the U.S. assuming the role of overlord of the subcontinent which has the responsibility to ‘stabilise’ it, etc. and seeks India’s ‘cooperation’. “Common threat” to India and the United States in Afghanistan? The U.S. has no role in the subcontinent and has to be ejected from Afghanistan by military force. Like Manmohan Singh being ordered by C.I.A.-RAW at the G-20 summit (above), children like Mukherjee, Shiv Shankar Menon and M. K. Narayanan that these Americans meet do not speak for India. A PTI report says Varun Gandhi has said he will not campaign against his family members, Sonia and Rahul. The fact that his loyalty to his family exceeds his loyalty to the country makes him totally unfit to be a Member of Parliament, from any party or as an Independent. Such loyalty is appropriate to a child, not to a Member of Parliament. It is also highly injurious to India since his aunt and cousin are at best traitors to India but in fact are enemies of India; one is a foreign white enemy, the other a half-white enemy. Since all Congress party candidates running to be Members of Parliament are similarly loyal to the Family, like children, not to the country, they are similarly unfit to be Members of Parliament. All others running to be Members of Parliament from various parties or as Independents are loyal, like children, to the white man and are unfit to be Members of Parliament. Since they are also participating in the white man’s crimes against the only Indian who is an adult, their candidacy is also highly injurious to India. The people of India, who elect such children, are also children and are all unfit to vote. I have said above that Indians’ child-like behavior toward the white man is due to the terrorization and subjugation they have undergone at the hands of the British in the holocaust I have described below. Its effects cannot be reversed without imposing a greater holocaust on the white man. Those effects have to be reversed first. These elections are a hindrance to doing that. ADDED ON APRIL 10, 2008: The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum yesterday:- ------------------------------------------------------------ India's Defence Requires Reunification of India & Pakistan An article (by Kaplan) in the New York Times of December 8, 2008 called for separating north and central India from the south, treating it as part of the Middle East and for America to be “at all places [of the Middle East, of which India, according to him, is a part] at once … with every bit of energy and constant attention that our national security apparatus -- and those of our allies -- can bring to bear”, including troops, colonising India with invasions and military operations as the United States has colonised the rest of the Middle East. This is the “jurisdiction” over India the Americans are claiming. The same article -- this was before Obama assumed office -- named Holbrooke as the U.S. envoy to the subcontinent who will bring about this overt colonisation of the subcontinent. And Holbrooke it is who has been appointed for this task! Obama has been made president by an ethnic group which controls not just the media in the United States but its government and foreign policy (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml ) . It is their aim to turn the subcontinent into a part of the Middle East and part of an overt American empire. Kaplan belongs to this ethnic group. Both of Holbrooke’s parents and his wife have been from this ethnic group. This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” (above and below) and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries. This ethnic group has established substantial control, not the least over media including cinema and cinema theater chains, since a letter of mine that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’ on the World War II holocaust. Afghanistan is the land of the Rig Veda where India's Vedic culture originated. The U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is occupation of India, just as U.S. attacks on Pakistan are attacks on India. India IS the real target of U.S. occupation of Afghanistan and partial occupation of Pakistan, as I have said above. The United States' occupation of Afghanistan, its drone attacks on Pakistan, etc., are directed toward eventually occupying India and establishing overt colonial rule over the entire Indian subcontinent. Unfortunately, the people and governments of the subcontinent are children who do not know what is going on and the fate that awaits them. Each day that goes by without India engaged in a crash program of producing ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States is a precious day lost in a war for survival. India's Foreign Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, who has been facilitating this and whom Holbrooke sees on his imperial visits to India, is a C.I.A. agent who was the one who signed the Defence Framework Agreement with the United States -- aimed at establishing a colonial relationship between the U.S. and Indian armed forces -- a few weeks before the nuclear deal -- which is aimed at capping, rolling back and eliminating India's nuclear weapons program -- was announced. Mukherjee is far from being the only member of the Indian government under U.S. control. I have said one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which are NOT Pakistan and China; RAW tries mightily to keep Indians preoccupied with thinking of Pakistan and China as its enemies.India-Pakistan conflicts of today are no different from the Hindu-Muslim rioting that accompanied the partition in 1947 and was instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. The only change is that the United States has taken the place of Britain. RAW, which was split off from the Intelligence Bureau, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (see post # 1 of the following thread: RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ) and something similar is the case with the other intelligence agencies of the region. They are used for terrorist acts in the Subcontinent by the C.I.A. for various purposes, just as the Kargil war was staged by C.I.A.-RAW, with the help of Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled army chief (Musharraf), to help Vajpayee win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence and thus help him remain prime minister; Vajpayee used to be an informant for the British before Independence and has been a C.I.A. agent since the United States replaced Britain as the imperial power over the subcontinent and he is far from being the only politician who has been a C.I.A. agent. Nehru was a life-long British agent, as he admitted to American ambassador Galbraith and his descendents (Indira, Rajiv) have been C.I.A. agents, though they also had a relationship with the KGB because Indira became prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri in Tashkent at the C.I.A.'s request. A C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak forum a few months ago was asking that India acquiesce in the American invasion and occupation of Pakistan and later of India. He said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started) and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative; Musharraf was not the only C.I.A. agent in the military. So it all boils down to continued white rule over India and Pakistan after 1947; it is just that the control of these countries has been transferred to covert agencies and they are nominally independent. The United States now wants to overtly occupy and rule the subcontinent, starting with Pakistan. The natives are willing to fight other non-white people like tigers, but behave like obedient dogs to the white master. RAW actively works to make overt American rule over India happen and India's so-called ruling class -- actually, puppet class -- is only too happy at the prospect because it felt orphaned when the British left India.The firangi is India and Pakistan's common enemy. They both need to defend against the firangi. They can do so while remaining separate nations and coordinating their defence. Or they can end the partition imposed on them by the British 'divide and rule' policy. Because of the firangi's skill in dividing people, they will be safer ending the partition. --------------------------------------------------------------- ADDED ON APRIL 11, 2009: One of the tactics C.I.A.-RAW regularly uses -- most recently it did so with the ISRO chief -- is to announce a terror threat against an individual or institution and provide it with “security” -- the ISRO chief has been given ‘Z-level’ security -- which serves to give them ‘status’ -- as a bribe -- as well as intimidate them and bring them on the side of C.I.A.-RAW and the United States in the ‘war on terror’ and, by induction, for other purposes such as letting the U.S. participate in -- and thereby take control of -- India’s space program -- recently the ISRO chief had shown skittishness about such dependence, calling the spy satellite to be launched on April 20th an Indian satellite, because of my earlier negative comment about ISRO launching an Israeli spy satellite -- and thereby ‘neutralise’ me and keep India’s enslavement rolling along. The LeT and other entities from which the threats emanate are, of course, totally C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored and controlled entities. If the tactic does not suffice, C.I.A.-RAW can actually carry out an attack, as it has carried out hundreds of attacks in India since 1983, to keep the terror threats credible as well as for other purposes. In my letter dated May 11, 2005, below, I referred to the United States’ plan for India’s break-up. I have also written below about the insurgency in East Pakistan which led to the creation of Bangladesh as having been sponsored by C.I.A.-RAW -- I have mentioned K. Subrahmanyam proudly citing that insurgency, before the Tamil insurgency in Sri Lanka he helped create, as his ‘serving the motherland’ -- and an example of the United States encouraging such separatism, at the prompting of the C.I.A. because of my recent references to vegetarianism and Vedic culture, is a PTI report today “Hillary Clinton greets Bengalis on their new year: … on Saturday greeted Bengalis across the world … who share common Bengali culture and linguistic traditions .. Regardless of religion or nationality … with music, drama, and traditional foods …”. Of course, most people in Bengal are not vegetarians and eat fish and a Bengali graduate student from West Bengal at Harvard University in 1984 informed me that “Bengal is a low caste place” -- something I was unaware of despite having lived in Bengal for five years (before that, a professor of economics at the Delhi School of Economics, specializing in developmental economics, who was from Punjab and in the U.S. on an immigrant visa and hoping to get help for a hearing-impaired son but unable to get a job, informed me Sikhs were mostly low caste people -- another thing I was not aware of). When C.I.A.-RAW, through the ethnic group referred to in the addendum of April 10, 2009 above, arranged for the award of the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 to a mediocre Indian as a substitute for me, as I have described below, the then chief minister of West Bengal, Jyoti Basu, referred to ‘another Nobel Prize for Bengal’ and, in a letter that appeared in an online Indian news portal I wrote ‘It is not just hordes of inferior, seditious Bengalis going crazy thinking the White Master has smiled at them; there are hordes of equally inferior, seditious Indians everywhere else [and I cited “Punjab, Sindh, Gujarat, Maratha, Dravid, Utkal, Benga …” which was written by Tagore as a hymn to the visiting British emperor because of which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature] who go crazy at a hint of a smile from the White master …’ and I provided a solution for the problem; C.I.A.-RAW then bought the news portal, worth no more than perhaps a hundred thousand dollars, for many millions of dollars and another Indian news portal advised it to demand the price in cash ( see descriptions of C.I.A.-RAW’s media control, starting from my letter dated May 11, 2005 below). India’s “low caste” people had no problem accepting their low status -- under which gold-laden kings prostrated before sages living in the forest -- until the British -- and now the Americans -- started imposing a low status on ALL Indians -- Kipling’s “the poor, benighted heathen, half devil and half child” -- in relation to the barbarians of Europe (see addendum of March 20, 2009 above); their objective is not human rights for low caste Indians but treating all Indians as slaves and “ants”. India today does not aim to enslave or wipe out low caste Indians, just the barbarians of Europe (see Press Release of November 8, 2008 below) and it will do so while remaining united. As I have said, India has “the obligation to dominate, rather than be dominated by, the intellectually and morally inferior ‘mlecchas’ of the West and do whatever is necessary to enslave and, if necessary, exterminate them. And it WILL be necessary’. This is what India’s nuclear supremacy over the United States is about for which New Delhi/ Delhi has to be destroyed with a nuclear explosion. Do not for a moment believe the propaganda about equality in the United States. If India is to emerge from slavery, it has to have nuclear supremacy over the United States”. One paragraph of my letter in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper in 1993-94, referred to above, was close to the following:- ‘Science and other intellectual products, being the products of behaviour, reflect the characteristics of the behaver and the toxic, deeply deficient, demoniacal nature of jewish intellectual products, whether in physics, such as Einstein’s, or social science, such as Freud’s, is abundantly clear though the jewish stranglehold over the media and the education system -- even in India because the media and education system in India now are an appendage of the West’s -- prevents any discussion of it.’ The barbarous, inferior West, of which this ethnic group is a component, has to be killed by its own toxin. The reason India’s greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian is unknown to the Indian public and suffering the worst crimes in the history of mankind from India’s enemies for the past 32 years is the treasonous Tamils like K. Subrahmanyam who burns with envy and jealousy of an Aryan North Indian and has been the principal instrument of the C.I.A. in its crimes against me and against India, including all terrorism and separatism since 1983; to a lesser extent this has been due to the “inferior, seditious Bengalis” and other inferior, seditious Indians. Regaining control over India has to precede the destruction of the West. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi is needed to regain control over India. Once the West is destroyed, the problem will be solved for the long term. ADDED ON APRIL 13, 2009: I said above (April 6, 2009) that India must move from pacifism to militarism -- which means nuclear supremacy over the United States -- in order to be economically prosperous as well and that “Indians’ pacifism is related to the indifference to material goods and emphasis on spiritual goals they are taught”. As a countermeasure, the C.I.A. instructed Advani to promise, in a letter to religious leaders, “an institutionalised mechanism to allow religious leaders to get involved in the country’s governance if he becomes Prime Minister” and “seek on a regular basis the guidance of spiritual leaders of all denominations on major challenges and issues facing the nation” (The Telegraph, April 12, 2009). The C.I.A.’s countermeasure is meant to keep Indians wedded to pacifism and enable the government to reject the goal of nuclear supremacy over the United States. RAW, which has sponsored rival Shankaracharyas, etc., is known to control quite a few religious leaders on all sides, sadhvis -- such as in the Malegaon blast case -- etc. This report called Advani’s promise a “major departure from the Vajpayee era” but in fact the Rath Yatra that Advani first undertook and the demolition of the Babri mosque -- with which Vajpayee publicly expressed unhappiness -- were carried out at the C.I.A.’s advice to Vajpayee, as a means to make its life long agent prime minister. Later, when Advani was Home Minister, criminal charges against him were brought in the Babri mosque demolition case and used to make him go to Washington, visit the C.I.A. headquarters and bring India’s Home Ministry and Intelligence Bureau under C.I.A. control -- after in a letter to the press I pointed to something the Intelligence Bureau had uncovered and Advani as Home Minister referred to which showed RAW’s role in carrying out a major terrorist act in Jammu -- and make them participants in the C.I.A.’s crimes against India including terrorism and crimes against India’s greatest scientist and greatest living Indian that I have described. At one point, Sushma Swaraj had shown some independence from Vajpayee and engaged in a ‘poster war’ against him; Vajpayee, with the C.I.A. support he has had throughout, such as in Deen Dayal Upadhyay’s brutal murder which made his career (see my letter dated November 24, 2004 below), made things so nasty for her she came literally crying to him and begging to be taken back in and he made her Minister for Information and Broadcasting and then she was used by C.I.A.-Vajpayee to bring a flood of foreign media into India which has taken over India’s media scene. A former senior C.I.A. officer referred to Yeltsin as “a creature of C.I.A. support” (addendum of February 8, 2006 below); Vajpayee has totally been a creature of C.I.A. support. The C.I.A.’s management of politicians -- on all sides -- in India is far more extensive and long-standing than such management it has exercised in Russia. After Indira Gandhi very badly lost the elections in 1977 after the Emergency, the Indian envoy in the U.S. was called in and warned against any injury to her while the U.S. stood ready to evacuate her from India, like Marcos from the Philippines, if necessary. A PTI report in Times of India today says “BJP president Rajnath Singh said if his party is voted to power then India would send troops to Pakistan to crush terrorism after taking international approval“. I have said that through the recent Mumbai attacks, the United States was, in part, seeking to have India send troops into Pakistan so the U.S. can send its own troops into Pakistan also, where it has been carrying out attacks by drones, as a step toward the occupation and colonization of the entire subcontinent. Like Rajiv Gandhi saying to the foreign press in New Delhi before the 1991 elections that ‘Indian troops have gone berserk in Kashmir, human rights have been violated in Kashmir’ -- which appeared in the New York Times but not in the Indian press -- political parties in India competitively seek the C.I.A.’s favour which plays them like the keys of an organ to produce whatever music it wants, as I said in a letter in Indian Express in 1991 which appeared under the title “The Organ and the Keys”. After I said, such as in my letter dated July 14, 2004, below that Mani Shankar Aiyar “has been intimately involved in the C.I.A.'s day-to-day activities in India in recent years” (he has been, among other things, sitting at C.I.A.-supplied terminals to participate in the C.I.A.’s crimes against me), he was asked by newsmen if he is being “targeted” [by me] and he replied “I am targeting them”, for being “fundamentalist” (that is when I learnt I was now being called a “fundamentalist” by the Indians on the C.I.A.’s payroll, presumably because of what I said in the letter dated April 1, 2005 below and this was their ‘justification’ for the C.I.A.’s crimes against the greatest Indian scientist for the past 32 years). According to reports, “L K Advani on Monday demanded an apology from Congress President Sonia Gandhi for her statement that India was in greater danger from people inside than foreign terrorists [she said this because of the first paragraph of my addendum dated April 11, 2009, above], which he said was an implied attack on his party” -- because he knows Indira and Rajiv Gandhi similarly benefited from C.I.A.-RAW’s terrorism, separatism and crimes against the greatest living Indian, before they were themselves killed by C.I.A.-RAW because of my ’influence’ on them -- and he invited her to instead engage in a “debate” with him on “fundamentalists” like “Al Qaeda” (presumably DRDO is India’s Al Qaeda to Advani, Aiyar and their parties and to C.I.A.-RAW; Condoleezza Rice, when U.S. Secretary of State, had said the Al Qaeda leader is ‘kind of a mystical figure who sits in a cave and issues statements‘, apparently having my letter dated May 15, 2004 below in mind). Like the political parties being all together in facilitating the U. S. occupation and overt colonization of India, they are all together in the United States’ crimes against the only Indian acting to liberate India and destroy its enemies. These traitors have to be destroyed first. They could have called me a Hindu sage sitting in a Himalayan cave and providing guidance. Were the sages of the Mahabharat or Krishna of the Bhagwad Gita Al Qaeda? Some years ago, in a letter to the press, I referred to myself as “Bhishma” lying on a bed of arrows because of the blizzard of verbal and material injuries -- being robbed of my money, property and dignity and subjected to the worst kind of abuse, epithets and threats including death threats as well as actual violence and torture and being actually made blind -- directly from C.I.A.-RAW or induced by C.I.A.-RAW in others, I have faced along with 24-hour satellite surveillance and continual harassment of the worst kind for well over three decades. On the Bharat Rakshak forum I found that the Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam, participating in and orchestrating these crimes against me and against India, was being called ‘Bhishma Pitamah’ by another Tamil Rakshas! I have repeatedly called below for building a “Ram Setu for the present” -- ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the continental United States, which makes me the present day Ram. Was Ram an Al Qaeda leader as Advani as well as the Tamil Rakshas Aiyar calls him? ADDED ON APRIL 14, 2009: The injuries to India being inflicted by the Tamil Rakshasas (see above) cannot be exaggerated. If they are let go and allowed to form a separate nation, they will be a constant conduit for India’s enemies into the subcontinent. Remaining in India, they have immobilized it, unable to get out of slavery to the white man, which begins with language and culture. It is the nonsense of democracy that has brought the Rakshasas on top and made India unable to get out of slavery and child-like behaviour toward the white man. I have said below that when the Americans talk of exporting democracy, they mean exporting rule by the C.I.A. If the greatest living Indian were not being suppressed by C.I.A.-RAW for the past 32 years, all the inferior slaves and children running for public office will be swept away in elections. Therefore they have to be swept away by means of two nuclear explosions in New Delhi. Were it not for the aggression of the white man and, before that, Muslim invaders, India would have never felt the need to impose linguistic or other kinds of uniformity over India and India would have continued to celebrate its rich linguistic and cultural diversity while Sanskrit would have remained India’s link language and the Vedic culture the substrate of its cultural diversity. Destroying the external enemy requires some simple steps -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and nuclear supremacy over the United States -- which can be taken without any change by way of language and culture, just making the only Indian who is an adult (see above) in charge. After the West is destroyed, India can continue with its traditional linguistic and cultural diversity without anyone imposing anything on anyone and still be a single nation, as it has been for millenia. It has been pointed out by Westerners that India is the original home of racism and still retains a very strong preference for Aryan appearance over Dravidian appearance. This is also the reason for Indians’ helpless submission to the white man. Whatever problems I have had in the United States have been from the jews who have also been the enablers of the aggression of others, both American and Indian. Because of the injuries inflicted by jews, inferior people of all kind got the opportunity to vent their jealousy and aggression -- and EVERYBODY is inferior to me. I am the saviour of mankind today, as there have been saviours in the past and jews have a history of assaulting such people. The problem before mankind today, as in the past, remains the JEWISH PROBLEM. As I said to an Iranian graduate student at MIT in whose dormitory suite I took shelter in the summer of 1980, “Jews are evil. But they have such a grip on the United States that in order to destroy the jews, this whole country will have to be destroyed”. In the letter in Delhi‘s ‘Patriot’ newspaper I have referred to above, one paragraph quoted an aide of U.S. president Nixon who had said “The Bible says there are the Satanic jews and that’s where all our problems come from” and I wrote ‘Nixon also referred to the total jewish control over the media. Truer words were never spoken by an American. In a letter to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in July, 1982, I referred to an act, by American jews, that was the equivalent of ‘an annihilitory nuclear first strike on India’. If there is nuclear war between India and the U.S. -- which is more than likely and which, given proper direction, India will win though India’s official analysts wouldn’t have a clue how, it will be because of the jews. The facts of observation are in accord with the traditional Christian theological view that the jews, by deepest nature, never cease to be the enemies of mankind.’ ADDED ON APRIL 15, 2009: The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:- ----------------------------------------------------------------- This is what I said shortly before the Mumbai terrorist attack: There are various distractions such as terrorism -- I have said almost all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 has been sponsored by the C.I.A. -- K. Subrahmanyam has been the kingpin of all this C.I.A.-sponsored terrorism and separatism in India, not just in Sri Lanka and East Pakistan and in even more serious crimes than terrorism and separatism against India; why doesn’t someone torture him and investigate him? I can provide a lot of evidence, though I know that only the nuclear destruction of New Delhi will do the job -- through RAW and other intelligence agencies in the region using several layers of intermediaries in various religious groups, army officers, corporate houses, politicians and others -- and piracy, which is sea-based terrorism sponsored by the C.I.A. and, like the land-based terrorism, aims to draw India into a U.S.-led war on terrorism and piracy. C.I.A.-RAW are extremely skillful in buying or gaining the confidence of people by various means; to take one example out of hundreds, they have recently silenced a critic of the nuclear deal by getting his book published in the United States (a tactic they used with a Japanese academic, for example, who was shocked by Harvard University’s and the C.I.A.’s “sensational” crimes against an Indian scientist, by having his book published by the Harvard University Press, etc.), having him host Americans for a conference and with RAW feeding him disinformation which he now proudly cites as being from ’intelligence sources’ -- as well as in creating public distractions by terrorist acts, separatist movements, etc., but India has to focus like a laser beam on the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then of the United States.This is what I said on November 27, 2008: Objectives of C.I.A.-RAW-Staged Terrorist Attacks In Mumbai :K. Subrahmanyam and C.I.A.-RAW have eliminated the Bombay Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) Chief in their latest terrorist act in Bombay which had more than one objectives but one of which was forestalling an investigation of K. Subrahmanyam -- the king-pin of C.I.A.-RAW operations in India including all terrorism and separatism in India since 1983 -- which I referred to above in this press release.[Post on Bharat-Rakshak online discussion forum: ] “Times Now reporting US intel officials were present at the Taj at the time of the attack and might have been injured or killed”. It is the Indian equivalent of the U.S. intelligence attack on the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad (see Press Release dated September 22, 2008 below).[Post on Bharat-Rakshak: ] “there was a story on air for just a few minutes and then it was pulled. It talked about a female editor in the Times of India was inside the Taj (Oberoi?) and coordinated the attacks from there. She then reportedly disappeared. her. Anybody has any information? The media is obviously blacking out this news”.As I have said below, the Times of India is RAW’s principal mouthpiece and K. Subrahmanyam has been a “Consulting Editor” there; RAW operatives who act as moderators on Bharat-Rakshak and control the forum locked this thread away and covered up this post.The United States’ FBI and Israel’s commandos must NOT be allowed to operate in India; one of the objectives of this C.I.A.-Mossad-RAW operation is to bring India further into the U.S.-Israel colonial ambit with bases in India, predator strikes, as in Pakistan and the rest.-----------------------------------------Without an investigation and prosecution of K. Subrahmanyam, the trial of the captured Mumbai attack gunman, Ajmal, is a farce. -------------------------------------------------------------------- India can start the solution to the JEWISH PROBLEM with the nuclear destruction of Tel Aviv and Haifa. It can do so with the nuclear warheads and missiles it already has. It should warn the United States and other nuclear countries that their largest cities will be destroyed if there is any kind of retaliation from any quarter, including from Israel -- something that is also within India’s present capacities, as I have shown below. To make it clear, if there is any retaliation from Israel, the United States’ largest cities will be destroyed. ADDED ON APRIL 16, 2009: The RAW-controlled media are still promoting the Nehru family with news and photographs. Children have started voting for other children. The jewish problem remains unsolved. The Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam remains outside jail. Traitors are still in charge of government and political parties. Nothing will move or change till the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. Since the jews are the cause of all of the other problems (see addendum dated April 14, 2009 above), it makes sense to solve the jewish problem by the nuclear destruction of Tel Aviv and Haifa first. Of course the Indians, from the top to the bottom, know about the crimes of the jews against me and against India but are willing to be bought and participate in the crimes, cutting India’s and their own throats. Is it their Dravidian genes that makes them so slavish toward the white man? What implications does it have for their future and for mankind, since so long as they are allowed to exist, they will continue to contaminate the gene pool, even if they provide useful services as the white man’s slaves at present? Does this make them a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be euthanized en masse? There cannot be a more important subject for public discussion. If the ancient Indians’ great achievements were the products of Aryan genes which, with the passage of time, have become so contaminated by Dravidian genes as to make the Indians’ survival more of a threat than benefit to mankind, the ancient Indians’ achievements are no defence against the extermination of the present day Indians. If, on the other hand, the slavish submissiveness of present day Indians toward the white man is good rather than bad for mankind and it is the aggressiveness of the white barbarians which makes the latter a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be exterminated so that the gentle Indians are liberated, it is the Indians that deserve to survive, not the barbarians of Europe. The considerations above apply not just to the inhabitants of India but to all inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent because, as I have said, all inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent carry both Aryan and Dravidian genes. This also has implications for inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent being allowed to immigrate to the United States and other white countries because, as I said on April 6, 2009 (repeated below), mere proximity or geographical location can transfer physical/anatomical and behavioural characteristics, without any admixture of blood:-"By the way, Negroid or Aryan, features of brown-skinned people are no guide to their behaviour because of the complex way genetics works; all brown people of the Indian subcontinent have both Aryan and Dravidian genes. The traitor Shiv Shankar Menon referred to above has sharp features. The very concept of 'genes' as it exists is highly problematic. Psychologist Carl Jung pointed out that Europeans who moved to North America have within very few generations and with no admixture of blood acquired some physical features of native Americans. I would add behavioral characteristics as well; the 'soul' which enters a child's body with the first breath is from among the souls that are around locally and brings with it its entire history, including behavioral characteristics and behavior can change genes as genes can change behavior. The anatomy and physical characteristics of an organism are not separate from its behaviour and both are affected by both heredity and environment. This is also the foundation of American insistence that only a U.S.-born citizen can be president of their country." To the above, I would add that this is also the basis for the traditional physical segregation of Dravidian or low caste people from Aryan or high caste people in India, both as to the localities where their communities could live and physical contact between individuals (“untouchability”). In my letter that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper in 1993-94, referred to above, about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’, I also said ”Half a million gypsies, said to have migrated from India, were killed by the Nazis. Have any films been made about that?” The British had a legal category called “Criminal Tribes” which included many of India’s wandering tribes -- without any fixed residences -- which have traditionally been considered as having criminal or anti-social characteristics. After India’s Independence, all these tribes were ‘denotified’ that is removed from that category and an attempt was made to settle them in permanent locations, though the legal category still exists. India’s police are still on heightened alerts on certain nights, such as moonless nights, when the traditional criminal tribes are thought to be particularly active. There are theories that the jews were originally from India and I have suggested that they, like gypsies, are from India’s criminal tribes which were expelled or migrated out of India milleniums ago. One paragraph in my letter in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper, referred to above, said : ‘The first effect of oppression is economic deprivation. But the jews have always been economically better off than the rest of the population. This was so in the Middle Ages, it is so today. This was so in the Soviet Union, this is so in the United States. Remember Shakespeare’s character, Shylock the jew? How could a member of an oppressed minority be in a postion to demand a pound of flesh? The jews have always been the oppressors rather than the oppressed. The so-called pogroms against the jews were the occasional backlash.’ My experience at Harvard University and elsewhere has shown that the jews exercise their oppression with the worst kind of violence. When Jaswant Singh went to Washington, Bush took him to the Oval Office and, referring to my proposal about money (see http://howindiaseconomycangrow.blogspot.com/ and my letter dated February 11, 2004 below and other letters below), told him about “the immense talent of Indians and the immense wealth [they] have given” to the U.S. (see my letter dated April 13, 2001 in http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 and letters about stock market manipulation). But, thanks to the jews, neither India nor I have benefited from it, only the jews. When I wrote about my proposal about money, the jewish Secretary of the Treasury in Clinton’s cabinet left his post and went to Wall Street to benefit from it. His successor and protégé, another jew from Harvard University, when he came to India, told Indians their economy can grow 10% per year (see my letter dated January 5, 2004 below) and went on to be president of Harvard University and to Wall Street to similarly benefit. In the same letter (dated April 13, 2001 in http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ), in an addendum dated April 28, 2001, I wrote “Observation has shown that almost all the evil in the world, including social ills and disease … can directly or indirectly be traced to these criminals”. In my letter dated February 23, 2001 (in http://www.thecurrentonline.com/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 ) I wrote “Mr. Bush said “he will ask Congress to increase funding for health research by nearly $3 billion for the coming fiscal year”. But what is most needed is uprooting of the organized criminal activity in universities that suppresses the best and brightest scientists; the ethnic group referred to [above] is central to this problem. What is he willing to do about that? (The most important research in biology and medicine in the last three decades and more, which promises to revolutionize these fields [see my profile below my letter dated January 5, 2004 below], was done with old laboratory equipment that originally cost a few hundred dollars).” ADDED ON APRIL 19, 2009: India can expect the Israelis to plant nuclear bombs in the largest Indian cities. This is what I wrote on September 15, 2001 (this and other letters to the press referred to in the paragraph below are in http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474-page3.shtml ): “The worst act of terrorism against the United States is the planting of nuclear weapons in the largest U. S. cities by Israel and its friends in the U. S. (see letters below) and those who harbor them are the worst enemies of the United States. There is a leadership vacuum in Washington and the military ought to fill it. If there are any patriots in the U. S. Congress who would like to impeach this president for high treason, they should speak up. This president's heart may be in the right place ( see the New York Times, September 15 '01, page A15 ) but he is a captive of Israel and its friends in the U. S. and has no freedom of speech or action. All countries in the world should provide their air space and basing facilities to U. S. forces moving to strike Israel. An international police force under U. N. auspices should be readied to take control of Washington, if necessary, to prevent mischief by Israel and its friends in the U. S.” What is India doing to prevent mischief by Israel and its friends in India? The first step is to get all Israelis out of India. One way to destroy Israeli mischief in Washington -- now the only way -- is to destroy Washington and New York. Delivering nuclear warheads to New York and Washington can be done without waiting by using a single warhead and doing without most of the extra weight of bells and whistles of countermeasures, precise guidance, etc. With the present state of the United States’ anti-ballistic missile defences, just two missiles carrying just one warhead each to New York City and Washington, D.C. will almost certainly get through. More will follow, destroying other cities, if there is any retaliation. Willingness to USE your nuclear arms, not just brandishing them, increases your power millions of times. Destroying two United States cities NOW will solve all of India’s problems. Almost as effective will be destroying Tel Aviv and Haifa now, with the threat to destroy New York and Washington if there is any retaliation. The key is to DO it, without any ado. The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:- ------------------------------------------------------------ Quote from an earlier post of mine:- “I have a certified letter, return receipt requested, from the United States' CBS television network which wanted to do a 'Sixty Minutes' story on me, which was the United States' most widely watched news and current affairs program at the time, with an audience of over 100 million. I did not respond. You are no more naive about the media and how the world works than a lot of other people. If you want to educate yourself, you have to read Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S. . Sorry, there is nothing more I can do.” As an example of how C.I.A.-RAW uses its control of the Indian media (see post # 1 of the following thread: RAW: India's External Intelligence Agency ) to control the behavior of politicians, for a couple of days, the media provided saturation coverage, with news and photographs, of members of the Nehru family and of Manmohan Singh while blanking out the BJP's Advani (India is having its general elections). Then sent the Indian Express to do an "exclusive" interview with him and give him a chance to get back in line -- he had stopped speaking to Manmohan Singh, staying physically apart and averting his face, when they came together at functions, because of what I wrote about the ‘bribery of contact’, an indicator of things to come -- and, in the interview, Advani said, among other things:- "On the Indo-US nuclear deal, he said: “We will think about it when we come to power. But we won’t allow our differences on the Indo-US nuclear deal to affect our determination for excellent relations with the US.” ----------------------------------------------------------------- The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behaviour into not using them, your enemies neutralise them as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile system. It is like neutralizing a bomber aircraft by paralyzing the crew’s ability to press the necessary buttons. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to use its nuclear arms against the United States or its agents in New Delhi. ADDED ON APRIL 21, 2009: The following points need to be emphasized:- 1. The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behavior into not using them -- this can be done by physical (including contact), chemical, financial or verbal/behavioral/psychological means including technological and other ‘aid‘/‘help‘ of various kinds-- your enemies neutralise your nuclear arms as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile systems. 2. Instead of first destroying the traitors in New Delhi, then building up India’s nuclear arms and then destroying the United States, one can by-pass the traitors in New Delhi by delivering just two nuclear warheads, of even twenty kilotons each, one to Washington and one to New York, with the capabilities India already has. 3. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to USE its nuclear arms against the United States. ADDED ON APRIL 22, 2009: I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States. The following is what I said on Pakistan Defence Forum today:- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- All these inferior, seditious people -- Manmohan Singh, Advani, Mukherjee, etc. -- talk of being prime minister. Is any of them talking about India using its nuclear arms against the United States, which will increase India's power millions of times? Are the media? Are the 'strategic experts'? Are academics? Is the man (or woman) in the street? Is the voter? Are the generals, admirals and air marshals? Any one? Who? On February 15, 2009 I explained why Indians are struck dumb and freeze up at any mention of defending themselves against the White Master:- -------------------------------------------------------------- The Indians' love and admiration for their British conquerors has been replaced by their love and admiration for their American enemies. For some perspective, see: http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/ About Indians' love and admiration for the white man generally, I wrote the following a few months ago:- Source of Manmohan Singh’s ‘Deep Love’ For Bush Indian politicians have condemned Manmohan Singh’s telling Bush that the people of India “deeply love” him. They should see the source of Indians’ love for the white man as I explained below many months ago:- “There is a basic difference between the treason of Indira, Rajiv and Vajpayee and that of Manmohan Singh. The holocaust after 1857 in which the British killed ten million Indians in the first decade to terrorize and subdue them [The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:..."] was in large part committed with the help of Sikhs. This terrorization and subduing continued right up to the end of direct British rule, exemplified by the Sikh soldier, riding in a jeep with the British viceroy, cutting down with his submachine gun any Indian, man woman or child, that came in view on either side of the road. The role of the Sikhs, who were originally founded to save India from foreign invaders -- the invaders were then Muslims -- reversed from 1857 on and they became a principal instrument of the British terrorization and subjugation of India. The Sikhs know how successful this terrorization and subjugation was -- it is this terrorization and subjugation because of which Indians today dare not even mention nuclear supremacy for India much less demand it -- and their role in it determines their attitude toward whites and toward Indians. This is why Manmohan Singh considers himself answerable to no one except Bush and the white man as he imposes the terrorization and subjugation of the nuclear deal on India, makes no attempt to hide his loyalty to the white man and shows open contempt for Indians…. Like Manmohan Singh and others praising British rule over India (he did that when receiving an honorary doctorate from Cambridge University; he was prime minister of India at the time), there are many Indians who praise American rule over India. Like the many Indians loyal to Queen Victoria, there are many Indians loyal to the white woman illegitimately living in the prime ministerial residence, illegitimately flying in the Air Force's special jets and giving orders to destroy India [she was treated as the empress of India even before she held any party or government post and all visiting heads of state were required to call on her at her residence; this was so even during BJP governments at the Center]. … In war, officers are under orders to execute on the spot any soldiers who are too terrorized to fight or obey orders to advance on enemy positions. … The terrorization and subjugation Indians have undergone at the hands of the British is responsible for Indians refusing to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy over the United States. It is necessary to execute -- machine gun and bulldoze into trenches -- at least a few thousand such Indians, who are in key positions -- such as RAW employees, politicians and media people -- to obstruct India's nuclear supremacy (they may be terrorized or bought up or both though being bought up is greatly facilitated by being terrorized; the terror, when long standing, is usually repressed meaning unconscious and being subjugated often involves both terror and carrot but terror is the foundation of the treason of RAW employees and people such as Vajpayee and Mani Shankar Aiyar though all they may feel is love and loyalty for the white man; terror facilitates such love [emphasis added]; a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, in a column in Hindustan Times, repeatedly quoted the white/Christian head of the missionary school he attended as the fount of all wisdom on various issues and referred to Indians as worshippers of snakes and monkeys on a Times of India blog -- I have referred in a letter below to RAW arranging for practitioners of an Indian discipline, whose understanding of gravity and inertia I called superior to that of Albert Einstein, to be physically attacked and driven away in Noida and Madhya Pradesh on the C.I.A.'s orders -- but such behavior of RAW employees, the behavior of desi people like Laloo Yadav and even thoroughly devout and traditional Indians and of all Indians in everyone's household, neighbourhood and community is profoundly determined by the terrorization and subjugation the British inflicted on Indians and this terrorization and subjugation is responsible for the fact that no Indian dares to even mention, much less demand, nuclear supremacy for India …), for India’s nuclear supremacy to go forward.” Since I wrote the above, I have said that, instead of being machine-gunned and bulldozed into trenches, Indians in a position to obstruct India’s nuclear supremacy over the most powerful white country will be destroyed with the nuclear destruction of New Delhi. ----------------------------------------------------------- I have also said:- ------------------------------------------------------------ There is an analogy between the lifting of the 'repression' that allows repressed thoughts and feelings to emerge into consciousness in psychotherapy and the problem of lifting the media cover up which keeps the facts of the white man and the most powerful white country, the United States, being India's most ferocious enemy from emerging into the public's consciousness. Lifting of this media cover up will be analogous to lifting of repression in psychotherapy, the patient being the public of India as a whole rather than an individual. Beneficial changes that occur in psychotherapy are often ascribed to the lifting of repression, but the lifting of repression itself is a consequence of changes in the situation that enable the threatening thoughts and feelings to emerge. It is fear, anxiety and such emotions evoked by the repressed thoughts that keep them from emerging into consciousness and it is a change in the situation -- such as the empathy and support of a powerful and respected authority figure, the therapist -- which reduces the fear and anxiety and enables the repressed thoughts to emerge. The bottomless dread of the white man, caused by the incomparable military supremacy over Indians of the British and now the Americans -- note the post above about the United States' view of the people of countries like Iran, India and Pakistan as "These guys are ants ... When the time comes, you crush them" -- and the exercise of their power by the British after 1857, killing over ten million Indians in just the ten years after 1857 (I have cited elesewhere The Guardian (August 24, 2007, Internet, report by Randeep Ramesh): "India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...': Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10 m, spread over 10 years:...") which continued right up to 1947 -- is responsible for the 'repression' which is the media cover up of the facts regarding the ferocious enemy that the United States is of India. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will change the situation so that India will be able to use its human and material resources to build a nuclear arsenal to destroy the enemy that is the United States while also lifting the media cover up of the facts which show that India has no greater enemy than the United States.Since the 'repression' is due to fear of the military might of the white man -- the white man's economic advantages are a consequence of his military might which can be used for the economic exploitation of the weak as I have shown above -- the change in the situation has to involve the exercise of military might. At the moment, India has the ability to exercise its nuclear might against the traitors in New Delhi who block the build up of India's nuclear arsenal so it can destroy the enemy that is the United States. The nuclear destruction of New Delhi will make possible such build up. I have shown elsewhere how the financial and other wherewithal for such build up is available to India. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- But I have said since the above that one can by-pass such traitor-obstructors in New Delhi by delivering just two nuclear warheads with two missiles to Washington and New York, with the capabilities India already has, without first destroying the traitors and building up India’s nuclear arsenal. A further point needs to be made. It is for a leader to lead his people out of slavery. If a leader talks of increasing India's power millions of times by the actual USE of its nuclear weapons against the United States, the people will understand and will follow. Those on the payroll of the C.I.A. -- all the politicians I mentioned above, the generals, the so-called ‘strategic experts‘, the media people, etc. -- will NOT talk about it. These politicians are unfit to lead. The people would not even know what is possible if they never hear about the possibilities. RAW is dedicated to ensuring that the people never hear of the possibilities (see http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/ ). There IS an Indian and only one Indian who knows India's present state and the possibilities, talks about the possibilities, is fit to lead and has been India's true leader. But the people have never heard about him. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is what I said on Pakistan Defence Forum yesterday:- --------------------------------------------------------------- On September 1, 2008 I wrote:- "In my letter dated June 27, 2004 ... I wrote “Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness -- perceived by yourself and others -- to use your arms is zero, their value -- deterrent and other -- is zero. The United States has a decisive advantage -- ideological, economic and military -- over the rest of the world because of its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms.” This applies as much to the use of nuclear arms within the country against agents of a foreign power -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will be the first such use of nuclear arms -- as outside the country. Also, as I have repeatedly emphasised, nuclear arms against the United States are needed not to “deter” it but to actually destroy it because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy, that is, to overcome deterrence. In other words, the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed. For this India needs nuclear supremacy over the United States and a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads -- an objective that is well within India’s reach; attaining this objective requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi first." On January 22, 2008 I wrote:-"For the United States, striving for nuclear supremacy over all nations of the world is an axiom of its foreign policy. An example of the United States' determination to prevent India from emerging out of slavery is in the following report from The Guardian of January 22 '08 where a former Chairman of the United States' Joint Chiefs of Staff and others talk of a nuclear first strike on India (without actually naming it) to keep it in a state of slavery:- "The west must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack to try to halt the "imminent" spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto for a new Nato by five of the west's most senior military officers and strategists. Calling for root-and-branch reform of Nato and a new pact drawing the US, Nato and the European Union together in a "grand strategy" to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world, the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world".The manifesto has been written following discussions with active commanders and policymakers, many of whom are unable or unwilling to publicly air their views. It has been presented to the Pentagon in Washington and to Nato's secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, over the past 10 days. The proposals are likely to be discussed at a Nato summit in Bucharest in April."The risk of further [nuclear] proliferation is imminent and, with it, the danger that nuclear war fighting, albeit limited in scope, might become possible," the authors argued in the 150-page blueprint for urgent reform of western military strategy and structures. "The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction."The authors - General John Shalikashvili, the former chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff and Nato's ex-supreme commander in Europe, General Klaus Naumann, Germany's former top soldier and ex-chairman of Nato's military committee, General Henk van den Breemen, a former Dutch chief of staff, Admiral Jacques Lanxade, a former French chief of staff, and Lord Inge, field marshal and ex-chief of the general staff and the defence staff in the UK - paint an alarming picture of the threats and challenges confronting the west in the post-9/11 world and deliver a withering verdict on the ability to cope."" In fact, one can go well beyond what I said above. On April 19, 2009 I said: "Delivering nuclear warheads to New York and Washington can be done without waiting by using a single warhead and doing without most of the extra weight of bells and whistles of countermeasures, precise guidance, etc. With the present state of the United States’ anti-ballistic missile defences, just two missiles carrying just one warhead each to New York City and Washington, D.C. will almost certainly get through. More will follow, destroying other cities, if there is any retaliation. Willingness to USE your nuclear arms, not just brandishing them, increases your power millions of times. Destroying two United States cities NOW will solve all of India’s problems. Almost as effective will be destroying Tel Aviv and Haifa now, with the threat to destroy New York and Washington if there is any retaliation. The key is to DO it, without any ado." The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behaviour into not using them, your enemies neutralise them as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile system. It is like neutralizing a bomber aircraft by paralyzing the crew’s ability to press the necessary buttons. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to use its nuclear arms against the United States or its agents in New Delhi." Regarding the above, the following points need to be emphasized:- 1. The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behavior into not using them -- this can be done by physical (including contact), chemical, financial or verbal/behavioral/psychological means including technological and other ‘aid‘/‘help‘ of various kinds-- your enemies neutralise your nuclear arms as surely as with any anti-ballistic missile systems. 2. Instead of first destroying the traitors in New Delhi, then building up India’s nuclear arms and then destroying the United States, one can by-pass the traitors in New Delhi by delivering just two nuclear warheads, of even twenty kilotons each, one to Washington and one to New York, with the capabilities India already has. 3. There is nothing India needs more urgently than to USE its nuclear arms against the United States. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ADDED ON APRIL 23, 2009: The following are posts today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- Post by a Pakistani:- ------------------------------------------------------------------- (Quoting from my earlier post) : “I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States.” and then India will no longer exist. India will be nuked from all sides of earth. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- My post:- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On December 25, 2008, I wrote:- "Another point that needs to be made is the capacity of countries like India and Pakistan, with a low degree of urbanisation, to survive a full-fledged nuclear war against a country such as the United States which has a high degree of urbanisation. If both India and the United States launch 5,000 nuclear warheads at each other, targeting the 4,000 largest population centers in the other country (let us assume for simplicity that anti-missile systems are not a significant factor with such a large number of warheads, though, in fact, I have predicted India's anti-missile systems will be far more effective than the United States'), what percentage of India's population will be in its 4,000 largest population centers as compared to the percentage of the United States' population that will be in its 4,000 largest population centers? The fact of the matter is that even if 60% or 90% or 95% of India's population perishes in a full-scale nuclear war with the United States, the remaining population -- say 50 million -- will equal India's population in its classical period and India will survive, with a life-style comparable to that in its classical period. On the other hand, the United States cannot survive the destruction of its 4,000 largest population centers because of the high degree of urbanisation, technology intensive life-styles and other cultural factors. To put it another way, if India loses ALL its electricity permanently, it will survive; the United States cannot. I am predicting that the population of the United States that survives being killed immediately by the nuclear explosions will survive for a limited time period by people eating one another till no one remains alive." In fact, the United States will not survive even the destruction of Washington and New York in a first strike by India with just two twenty kiloton warheads accompanied by a warning to destroy additional cities like Chicago if there is any retaliation. A first strike by India makes the crucial difference. It will increase India's power millions of times while the United States, though the people will not be eating one another, will be destroyed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- My post:- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 25, 2008, I said, in part:- "Another important point is that weapons such as tanks and fighter planes which carry human beings are a lot more difficult to design and produce than, say, intercontinental ballistic missiles which give a million times or more returns for the same investment of time and effort ('bang for the buck') so far as increasing a country's military power is concerned. Since India's principal aim should be nuclear supremacy, it should focus on designing and producing intercontinental ballistic missiles more than tanks and fighter planes; if you have nuclear supremacy over the United States, most other defence-related issues will take care of themselves. And, as I said, designing and building ICBMs that will do the job can be done a lot faster and require fewer resources, though India has the resources to build both ICBMs and tanks and fighter planes. The main advantage of focusing on ICBMs is time; it will bring India military supremacy a lot sooner than giving a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes (which will never bring India military supremacy over the United States). Another point is that although India should build nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed submarines carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles (SSBNs), like the ATV it is building, building these weapons platforms (SSBNs) is a lot more time and resource-consuming than building ICBMs that can be launched from road and rail-mobile vehicles. It is a mistake to make India's nuclear arsenal primarily a second strike resource (which is what SSBNs are good at); India's nuclear arsenal should primarily be for a first strike -- that is how you gain nuclear supremacy, by being able to carry out a successful first strike -- and a sufficiently large arsenal of road and rail-mobile ICBMs can be produced a lot faster than an arsenal based on SSBNs. Again, time is important. This does not mean India should not produce SSBNs, just that the emphasis should be on producing a large number of road and rail-mobile ICBMs. I also believe that India's anti-ballistic missile systems will be considerably better than those of the United States -- as DRDO has correctly said, its systems to defend against short and medium range missiles are already better than those of the United States -- if India can avoid sabotage by politicians and RAW on the C.I.A.'s payroll who try to shove american 'help' down India's throat. This is another reason India can afford to focus on road and rail-mobile ICBMs rather than on SSBNs (SSBNs are inherently difficult to destroy; with a really effective ABM system, India's road and rail-mobile ICBMs will also be difficult to destroy). Avoiding foreign 'help' is not a matter of 'false pride'; avoiding foreign help is essential for India's nuclear supremacy. ... Instead of ICBMs, India's nuclear weapons may primarily be delivered by the hyperplane (Avatar) under development. And its defence against enemy ICBMs may be provided by the space-based weapons, Durga (Directionally Unrestricted Ray-Gun Array) and Kali (Kinetic Attack Loitering Interceptor) systems." But India can destroy Washington and New York with two twenty kiloton warheads with the capabilities it already has and it can do so NOW, without waiting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- My post:- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Any other questions, children? (Don't be distracted by attempts of C.I.A.-RAW operatives here to derail the thread with irrelevant posts). About how Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, I have said the following on this board which I am bringing together with the dates:- "January 11, 2009: For country A to deter country B with its nuclear weapons, country A has to be able to deliver its nuclear weapons to country B. Everyone knows Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to India. But the country that is currently carrying out twice weekly attacks on Pakistan's territory is the United States. How can Pakistan deter the United States? Even without Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), it is not difficult to think of ways Pakistan could deliver half a dozen nuclear weapons to the United States' coastal cities such as New York and Washington. This thread is meant to explore ways in which Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, the knowledge of which would deter the United States. January 14, 2009: Any one who has an 'understanding' with a foreign power for attacks on his own country's territory is a slave. As I have said in another thread, both India and Pakistan are such slaves of the white man. I have said that the drone attacks are the start of a campaign by the United States to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent. Therefore India has to worry about the drone attacks as much as Pakistan and India has as much responsibility to stop them as does Pakistan. Since the attacker is a nuclear power, stopping the drone attacks has to include the possible use of nuclear weapons. "Why do we need to deliver nuclear weapons to the US?" Because the United States is attacking your territory and it is a nuclear power. Since the drone attacks are as much a threat to India as they are to Pakistan, India will have to stop them if Pakistan will not. Most Pakistanis would understand this. RAW has some operatives on this forum with Pakistani identities. Since RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (and Pakistan), it tries to stop any discussion of how these countries could defend themselves against the United States. I don't know if you are one of those but post # 2 ... [in an earlier thread] is by a RAW operative who registered after I started this thread and then posted something to try to stop any discussion of how Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States the knowledge of which will deter the United States from attacking Pakistan. Only someone who thinks that the white master has the right to do any thing he wants to his Indian and Pakistani slaves will object to such a discussion. January 15, 2009: RAW is not the only intelligence agency posting on such boards. So does the C.I.A. This S-2 person is from the C.I.A. Both RAW and the C.I.A. try to prevent any discussion of how countries like India and Pakistan can defend themselves against the United States. I have said that the prospect of Pakistan delivering half a dozen nuclear weapons to its coastal cities such as New York and Washington will stop the U.S. and its drone attacks cold. It does not matter if the United States' air force is a hundred times more capable than Pakistan's or its army has equipment poor Asians can't dream of; that is the beauty of nuclear weapons; they are a great EQUALISER. So let us consider how Pakistan could deliver nuclear weapons to U.S. coastal cities. One way it can do so is by cruise missiles mounted on naval vessels -- which could be submarines or surface vessels. Pakistan has nuclear capable cruise missiles which can be mounted on surface ships. The ship(s) will have to get within range of the target city. If the range of its nuclear capable cruise missiles is 500 miles, the ship will have to get within 500 miles of the target city. Note that this does not have to be a ship belonging to the navy. There is no reason why cruise missiles cannot be installed on merchant ships and properly camouflaged and launched when the ship gets within range of the target. Pakistan also has ballistic missiles of various ranges that are nuclear capable. Such missiles CAN be launched from surface ships, even merchant ships, from specially designed launching platforms and camouflaged/hidden till they get within range of the target. What are some of the other possibilities? Now is the time to get creative." Much of what I have said in the posts above about India applies to Pakistan as well: increasing the range of long-range ballistic missiles by doing without most of the the extra weight of the bells and whistles of counter-measures, precise guidance, etc. given the present state of anti-ballistic missile defences of the slave-masters; a lot more focus, of time and resources, on long-range nuclear armed missiles capable of hitting the slave-masters of the world than on tanks and fighter planes that can be used only against other slave countries or, even if used against the slave-master, will not bring military victory over him, etc. Note that, for India, I am saying a first strike on the slave-master is what is needed, not deterrence. Pakistan may be content by deterring the slave-master, which is looking for excuses to invade Pakistan on the pretext of dealing with the Taliban, etc. If the Taliban are now in Pakistan, that is because the slave-master has invaded and occupied their country; naturally, they have to go elsewhere in the subcontinent. It is obscene to call Afghan patriots defending their country against foreign invaders "insurgents". The United States claims a right to go all over the world and impose regime changes, culture changes and what not for its own "security"; the Taliban can't even go elsewhere in the subcontinent? ADDED ON APRIL 24, 2009: The first and foremost point is that the United States has absolutely no right to be in Afghanistan and both India’s and Pakistan’s primary concern should be to militarily eject the United States and NATO forces from Afghanistan. Pakistan’s president and prime minister who talk of fighting the Taliban but not of fighting the Americans who have been carrying out drone attacks on Pakistan deserve to be whipped before being executed. The same for India’s traitor prime minister, foreign minister, National Security Advisor, Foreign Secretary, etc. Ejecting the United States from Afghanistan and stopping its attempts to impose slavery on India by various means such as the nuclear deal necessarily requires the use of nuclear weapons: a first strike with two twenty kiloton warheads, one to Washington and one to New York, accompanied by a warning of similar strikes on other cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. This can and must be done NOW, without waiting for anything. The following are posts I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In another thread, I mentioned the Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam -- responsible for all C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored separatism and terrorism in the Indian subcontinent since 1983 and, before that, participant in the creation of the insurgency in East Pakistan that led to the creation of Bangladesh, as well as for sabotaging India's strategic programs and policies -- being called "Bhishma Pitamah" (of the Mahabharat) by another Tamil Rakshas on an Indian defence board. He is a moderator there, lives in the U.S. making missiles for the U.S. government and, among other things, collects intelligence on Indian missiles and other subjects for U.S. intelligence agencies. I wonder how many such foreign intelligence agents are on this board. India's nuclear first strike on Washington and New York with just two twenty kiloton warheads will also put an end to the traitors through whom the slave-master maintains its hold on the subcontinent. Such a first strike by India will solve Pakistan's and Afghanistan's problems also. As I have said below, those who would like to educate themselves on the issues should go to my blog. For every so-called 'freedom fighter', there were a hundred Indians faithfully working for the British. Since India's fake 'Independence', the situation has gotten only worse, not better. This is what I said, in part, in a letter dated January 5, 2004 to the press:- "When the British left India in 1947, they left behind a puppet regime of the kind the Americans are setting up in Iraq and have set up in Afghanistan in the form of the Karzai government. If Indians are to emerge from their centuries of slavery and, in fact, survive, the above program is absolutely essential. India's civil service, police service and military are like the collaborator civil service, police, and military the Americans are setting up in Iraq. Their primary role is to maintain the white man's control over India. India's Constitution was written under a British administrator, Mountbatten, who continued as Governor General of "independent" India, very much as the Constitution of Iraq's puppet/collaborator government is being written under an American administrator ( India's Constitution unabashedly refers to the British king simply as "His Majesty" ). The problem is not the Constitution but the continued control of India's administration and intelligence agencies which continue to function as branches of British/American intelligence agencies. India's Research and Analysis Wing has in innumerable ways suppressed my proposal about money under which India's per capita income can exceed that of the United States in a matter of, say, 15 years. They will implement only those parts of it, in highly diluted form, for which they receive permission from the White Master. When an American Treasury Secretary said that India's GDP growth rate could be 10% per year, then the Research and Analysis Wing dared to advance a growth rate of 8%. India's population at large is equally enslaved. The Americans have disbanded the Iraqi armed forces and are creating a collaborator army; India's army is the collaborator army that helped the British rule India; all it's units and regiments, etc., have retained their identities and trace their origins to the British times. The extreme imbalance of power created by the white man's extreme technological superiority has led to an extremely fierce loyalty to him in the regime and the population at large (see my letter sequence from March, 2002 to April, 2003 about the "inferior Indian niggers" ). It is a thankless task to try to break their chains but I feel I should try." To see how India is actually governed at present, you should see: http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com/ Because of nuclear weapons, though, now a very few people can wield the power to liberate the country. The nuclear first strike on the United States with just two twenty kiloton warheads on Washington and New York, accompanied by a warning to destroy additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation, will accomplish that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nuclear weapons and their delivery systems are important. No less important is the strategy in their use. In post # 7 above I said: “I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two twenty kiloton deliveries will destroy not just these cities but the United States and will be even more effective than multiple warheads in the megaton range delivered to each major city of the United States.” I have emphasised, in bold, the last sentence. THINK about what it says and how that is true. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDED ON APRIL 25, 2009: The following is a post I made today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- --------------------------------------------------------------- On [Bharat-Rakshak] forum, someone who took part in building, with Israeli help, the radar imaging satellite that India just launched, recalls: " I was with Indian Space prior to my retirement and I was part of the 8 or 10 ( just a handful ) people's group which was formed for this satellite. It was so secretive project that even our PAs and TSs did not know why we were meeting so often. The receiving system was ready in Nov2007 when I had not retired . I remember an amusing incident when that system was installed .. it did not work.. and finally the fault was traced to a Fiber Cable eaten by a r a t. A foreigner joked : Indian rats like hi-tec things .. they did not eat any other copper cable only the Fiber cable. " This Indian may or may not realise it but when the Israeli referred to "Indian rats", he meant the Indian people whom he was referring to as vermin who deserve to be exterminated. I have written repeatedly [see below] about the deadly poison that is Israeli, American and other foreign technological 'help' to India which keeps India from developing its own capabilities and keeps it in a dependent, childlike relationship to the white man; about Israeli 'help' to India I said in another thread (post # 1 of http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/24823-indias-defence-requires-reunification-india-pakistan.html ) here: "This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” [see above and below] and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries." For perspective, that post is worth repeating in full:- "An article (by Kaplan) in the New York Times of December 8, 2008 called for separating north and central India from the south, treating it as part of the Middle East and for America to be “at all places [of the Middle East, of which India, according to him, is a part] at once … with every bit of energy and constant attention that our national security apparatus -- and those of our allies -- can bring to bear”, including troops, colonising India with invasions and military operations as the United States has colonised the rest of the Middle East. This is the “jurisdiction” over India the Americans are claiming. The same article -- this was before Obama assumed office -- named Holbrooke as the U.S. envoy to the subcontinent who will bring about this overt colonisation of the subcontinent. And Holbrooke it is who has been appointed for this task! Obama has been made president by an ethnic group which controls not just the media in the United States but its government and foreign policy (see http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml ) . It is their aim to turn the subcontinent into a part of the Middle East and part of an overt American empire. Kaplan belongs to this ethnic group. Both of Holbrooke’s parents and his wife have been from this ethnic group. This ethnic group has gone all out, for the past 32 years, to host a parade of Indians in government, politics and other areas for the “bribery of contact” (above and below) and other kinds of bribes and multifarious and harmful arms, military, intelligence and strategic ‘aid‘, such as during the Kargil war sponsored by the C.I.A. (below), as cover for its infinitely greater injuries to India, including fatal economic, military and strategic injuries. This ethnic group has established substantial control, not the least over media including cinema and cinema theater chains, since a letter of mine that appeared in Delhi’s ‘Patriot’ newspaper about the movie ‘Schindler’s List’ on the World War II holocaust. Afghanistan is the land of the Rig Veda where India's Vedic culture originated. The U.S. occupation of Afghanistan is occupation of India, just as U.S. attacks on Pakistan are attacks on India. India IS the real target of U.S. occupation of Afghanistan and partial occupation of Pakistan, as I have said above. The United States' occupation of Afghanistan, its drone attacks on Pakistan, etc., are directed toward eventually occupying India and establishing overt colonial rule over the entire Indian subcontinent. Unfortunately, the people and governments of the subcontinent are children who do not know what is going on and the fate that awaits them. Each day that goes by without India engaged in a crash program of producing ten thousand nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them to the United States is a precious day lost in a war for survival. India's Foreign Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, who has been facilitating this and whom Holbrooke sees on his imperial visits to India, is a C.I.A. agent who was the one who signed the Defence Framework Agreement with the United States -- aimed at establishing a colonial relationship between the U.S. and Indian armed forces -- a few weeks before the nuclear deal -- which is aimed at capping, rolling back and eliminating India's nuclear weapons program -- was announced. Mukherjee is far from being the only member of the Indian government under U.S. control. I have said one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which ane NOT Pakistan and China; RAW tries mightily to keep Indians preoccupied with thinking of Pakistan and China as its enemies. India-Pakistan conflicts of today are no different from the Hindu-Muslim rioting that accompanied the partition in 1947 and was instigated by the Intelligence Bureau which had remained loyal to the British after 1947. The only change is that the United States has taken the place of Britain. RAW, which was split off from the Intelligence Bureau, functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India [ see http://whatyoushouldknowaboutraw.blogspot.com ] and something similar is the case with the other intelligence agencies of the region. They are used for terrorist acts in the Subcontinent by the C.I.A. for various purposes, just as the Kargil war was staged by C.I.A.-RAW, with the help of Pakistan's C.I.A.-controlled army chief (Musharraf), to help Vajpayee win the election that was pending after he had lost a vote of confidence and thus help him remain prime minister; Vajpayee used to be an informant for the British before Independence and has been a C.I.A. agent since the United States replaced Britain as the imperial power over the subcontinent and he is far from being the only politician who has been a C.I.A. agent. Nehru was a life-long British agent, as he admitted to American ambassador Galbraith and his descendents (Indira, Rajiv) have been C.I.A. agents, though they also had a relationship with the KGB because Indira became prime minister by the KGB's assassination of Shastri in Tashkent at the C.I.A.'s request. A C.I.A. specialist on India who came on Bharat-Rakshak forum a few months ago was asking that India acquiesce in the American invasion and occupation of Pakistan and later of India. He said that Pakistan's defences have been electronically neutralised to allow the ingress of Predator drones (this was before the drone attacks started) and that Pakistan's military is quite cooperative; Musharraf was not the only C.I.A. agent in the military. So it all boils down to continued white rule over India and Pakistan after 1947; it is just that the control of these countries has been transferred to covert agencies and they are nominally independent. The United States now wants to overtly occupy and rule the subcontinent, starting with Pakistan. The natives are willing to fight other non-white people like tigers, but behave like obedient dogs to the white master. RAW actively works to make overt American rule over India happen and India's so-called ruling class -- actually, puppet class -- is only too happy at the prospect because it felt orphaned when the British left India. The firangi is India and Pakistan's common enemy. They both need to defend against the firangi. They can do so while remaining separate nations and coordinating their defence. Or they can end the partition imposed on them by the British 'divide and rule' policy. Because of the firangi's skill in dividing people, they will be safer ending the partition." I wrote above that "one nuclear bomb will be targeted at the RAW headquarters and another at North and South Blocks in New Delhi to destroy enough of these traitors and start on a program of what India needs to do to survive and defeat its mortal enemies which are NOT Pakistan and China". But now I am saying India can deliver one twenty kiloton nuclear bomb to Washington and another to New York, accompanied by a warning of similar deliveries, in case of any retaliation, to additional cities such as Chicago, to destroy its enemies and India can and must do so NOW, with the capabilities it already has. And India should do so without waiting for Pakistan to do anything. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDED ON APRIL 27, 2009: Far more than Prabhakaran, India ought to be arresting and prosecuting K. Subrahmanyam and not just for the killings of Indira and Rajiv Gandhi and hanging K. Subrahmanyam, not Afzal Guru. The Tamil Rakshas on Bharat-Rakshak forum I referred to above, who works for U. S. intelligence agencies and called K. Subrahmanyam “Bhishma Pitamah”, refers to “DIEnasty politics” killing Indira and Rajiv but it was not politics but C.I.A.-RAW and, specifically, K. Subrahmanyam who killed them, because of my ‘influence’ on them because of which India's strategic programs, aimed at defence against the United States, were started and re-started. Vajpayee shut them down, contrary to his stance in claiming 'credit' for the nuclear tests, carried out to deceive people because I wrote "Defence is not on the agenda" (see addendum of March 20, 2009 above). Both RAW and the C.I.A. have been threatening me with a nasty death and other things; see threats to me -- along with an offer to transfer one crore rupees into my account within 48 hours if I was "willing to cooperate with us at RAW?" and saying "we are seeking your cooperation for a very important matter, i.e. the cause of Indo-US friendship. I am pleased to inform you that we will be awarding you handsomely for your cooperation. We will transfer the sum of INR 10,000,000/- (1 crore rupees) to your bank account within 48 hours of receiving confirmation of your willingness to assist us" -- posted by K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director Michael Hayden on an article of mine on August 10 and 11, 2008 which was published, after totally altering it and eliminating all of the main points, under the title "Ridding India of foreigners for nuclear autonomy" (the title I had given it was "National Security: Ridding India of Firangis & Their Agents"; see addendum dated August 4, 2008 below for the article as I sent it; the threats and the offer of one crore rupees are at http://www.merinews.com/commentAll.jsp?articleID=138816 and in the attachment to this E-Mail) because of which I have had to stop going out of the house for the past couple of months; these threats have been made with the fullest knowledge of India's politicians, government, media and others; is there any provision of "security", Z-plus or other, for me? Illustrating what I have said about the Tamil Rakshasas being a constant conduit for the entry of India’s enemies into the subcontinent, “Obama only hope for Lanka issue: Vaiko: … MDMK leader Monday said US President … was “the only hope” to ensure a solution for the Sri Lanka Tamils issue and sought his intervention … in a letter sent to Mr. Obama … you (Obama) are the only hope for us, who can effectively intervene to stop the genocidal war [meaning the insurgency created by K. Subrahmanyam, as he later did in Punjab and elsewhere, as I have said; the language and ethnic issue, if any, was no more than what led to the creation of Haryana from Punjab; one can easily create an insurgency of left-handed people against right-handed people] of Sri Lanka and save our Tamils” … “ (PTI report in The Hindu, April 27 ‘09, Internet). A by-product of India’s nuclear destruction of the United States (above) will be India regaining control over India, not just up to the Hindukush (“Hindu-killer”) mountain ranges. A C.I.A.-RAW operative who writes for the Hindustan Times says “The Congress … may play its final trump card and propose the name of … Shinde, a dalit, for PM. No political party will be able to reject his candidature … “. India must reject all politics and all politicians. As for "security", Z-plus or other, for me, this is what I said about "security" on April 11 '09: "One of the tactics C.I.A.-RAW regularly uses -- most recently it did so with the ISRO chief -- is to announce a terror threat against an individual or institution and provide it with “security” -- the ISRO chief has been given ‘Z-level’ security -- which serves to give them ‘status’ -- as a bribe -- as well as intimidate them and bring them on the side of C.I.A.-RAW and the United States in the ‘war on terror’ and, by induction, for other purposes such as letting the U.S. participate in -- and thereby take control of -- India’s space program -- recently the ISRO chief had shown skittishness about such dependence, calling the spy satellite to be launched on April 20th an Indian satellite, because of my earlier negative comment about ISRO launching an Israeli spy satellite -- and thereby ‘neutralise’ me and keep India’s enslavement rolling along. The LeT and other entities from which the threats emanate are, of course, totally C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored and controlled entities. If the tactic does not suffice, C.I.A.-RAW can actually carry out an attack, as it has carried out hundreds of attacks in India since 1983, to keep the terror threats credible as well as for other purposes." Is the father of India's strategic program, the greatest Indian scientist since ancient times and the greatest living Indian, under threat and harassment from C.I.A.-RAW for decades and now faced with an acute crisis and imminent threat to his life and limbs, entitled to "security"? But C.I.A.-RAW decides who gets "security". ADDED ON APRIL 29, 2009: The following are posts today on Pakistan Defence Forum:- Post by a Pakistani: ------------------------------------------------------------------ US biggest enemy are the US policy makers. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Post by me:- ------------------------------------------------------------------ The U.S.'s biggest enemy is the C.I.A. as it is of the world. The C.I.A. and its associated intelligence agencies such as the one to which the Australian above belongs and their Indian slaves have been committing crimes against India and the world from before they started their crimes against India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian 32 years ago. Psychologist B. F. Skinner, with a fundamentally and grossly erroneous theory of human nature set the C.I.A. -- whose agenda has been set by ignorant and criminal Harvard professors rather than by U.S. presidents or Congress -- on this disastrous course. Through the C.I.A., he imposed his agenda on India and the rest of the world as well. Neither past nor the current Negro president of the U.S. seem capable of anything else, puppets of the C.I.A. as they are. It won't be long before the world is rid of this evil. This is what I wrote in a letter dated April 28, 2006 to the press:- "Regarding the case of a novel by an Indian sophomore at Harvard: a graduate student from the Indian subcontinent at Boston's Northeastern University was accused of plagiarism because the quality of English in assigned work she turned in for a course was incomparably superior to anything she was capable of writing and, to prove this, she was required to answer the same questions in the presence of a faculty member. She wrote about thirty pages in perhaps two hours which exactly reproduced what she had earlier turned in. The faculty member alleged she had copied from papers she had with her. In her rebuttal, the student wrote this faculty member was watching her like the proverbial "hawk" throughout this session and her charge of copying was a "damnable lie". She explained, in her rebuttal and to her faculty adviser, that she had "memorized" what she reproduced in the presence of the faculty member. The lying faculty member was obliged to leave the university. The Harvard sophomore, an Indian-American, says (New York Times, April 27 '06, Internet) she had read the books from which she is alleged to have plagiarized three or four times, that she has a "photographic memory" and had last read the books some time before she wrote her own book. Psychologist B. F. Skinner, whose plagiarism I exposed (see letter dated February 26 '05 below), upon which he was awarded an honorary doctorate by Harvard and I was mugged in a Harvard seminar (see letter dated May 11 '05 below), wrote in his 'Notebooks' that the practice, several thousands of years old and still continuing, of Brahmin priests memorizing entire books (such as the Vedas) may have had a (genetically) "selective effect" endowing them with superior memory (and other cognitive abilities). Memorization of very long texts is still the standard way students learn, at all levels, in the Indian subcontinent and the practice is not limited to Brahmin priests (the Northeastern University student was Muslim). Such ability, commonplace to Indians, is astonishing to Americans. The Harvard sophomore, of Indian origin with near perfect SAT scores, can be expected to have genetically superior memory and her explanation of how she came to reproduce portions of books she had read is believable. This does not mean that she did not intentionally plagiarize, just that her explanation is credible.Skinner, author of 'Verbal Behavior', describes playing the "sedulous ape" to established authors as a way budding authors learn. Examples of similarities between the Harvard sophomore's novel and the novels she read (Boston Globe, April 25 '06, Internet) would have fit this description if the similarities were intentional. The similarities could be unconscious yet intentional (there are unconscious intentions). But they could have been both unconscious and unintentional, because of the way a person's verbal repertoire is formed. Skinner's own plagiarism was infinitely more serious (see my paper in BEHAVIORISM, Spring, 1976). Skinner was voted by American psychology department chairpersons as the most influential living psychologist and, along with Sigmund Freud, one of the two most influential psychologists of all time. A survey showed that his world-wide reputation exceeded the combined reputation of the thirty or so Nobel prize winners in the Boston area. It was based on his position of 'radical behaviorism' which he defined in terms of his opposition to what he called 'mentalism' and Freud, of course, is the great mentalist. For his position to be viable, he had to provide an account of the so-called 'higher mental processes' such as language, which he did in 'Verbal Behavior'. By showing that his account of language was simply a refinement of the work of Freud, my paper in BEHAVIORISM eliminated any basic distinction between his position and Freud's and the basis for his claim to being a great and original thinker. In a question and answer session with thousands of his followers who packed the grand ballroom of the Hilton hotel in Chicago in May, 1977, he was very angrily denounced by his own followers, such as by one who stood up, livid with rage, shouting, referring to my paper and its implications ("SATISH CHANDRA HAS SHOWN..."), for the fraud he had perpetrated on them and the world; his world-wide reputation and appearance on TIME magazine's cover, etc., were due to the fundamental importance of the basic nature of human beings, for prescriptions on how they should live and be educated and governed, issues of freedom, etc., of whether they are machines or have a mind or soul and how they function. Skinner acknowledged "similarities" between him and Freud shown by "Chandra" in "BEHAVIORISM", but had no response beyond first emphatically and aggressively saying "Or Jesus Christ! Or B. F. Skinner!" in the same breath, then minimizing the importance of such matters by appealing to the general state of ethics and what is acceptable in academia with a light-hearted "what--Miller wrote it, Gallanter takes credit for it, Pribram believes it!" (these were co-authors of a book in cognitive psychology). Upto then, Skinner had had his critics such as Chomsky of M.I.T. but had, correctly, maintained that Chomsky's review of 'Verbal Behavior' was based on very poor scholarship and a misunderstanding of his position. He could not say that about my paper in BEHAVIORISM, the principal vehicle for theoretical work in radical behaviorism, whose editor called me with profound emotion about a day after he received it and wrote to me "Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field". From Germany alone, more than two dozen psychologists wrote me requesting reprints, besides every behaviorist in the United States. That paper was effective in a way that Chomsky's was not and killed behaviorism ( the journal's name has been changed to 'Behavior and Philosophy'). Skinner himself wrote to me (see excerpts from his letter on my web page: http://www.psychotherapy.eboard.com/ ) about that paper, before the above session with his followers, "...want to tell you, while the spell is on me, how much I admire what you have done. You have made a much more courageous use of the autoclitic and the atomic operant than I did, with breath-taking results. Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward-moving...", etc. But after the above session with his followers, his behavior was very different (see the letter sequence below). Verbal behavior is a far more complicated matter than either Skinner or Freud (or cognitive psychology) provide for. For example, person A can show induction from person B's verbal behavior without ever coming into contact (as conventionally understood) with person B's verbal behavior. The Harvard sophomore, though, had repeated, extended contact with the other author's books. In an example (Boston Globe, April 24 '06, Internet) both authors refer to "170 specialty stores". This puts a question mark on intentional plagiarizing, because an intentional plagiarizer would have changed the number to something other than 170." U.S. conservative William F. Buckley who, after finishing Yale, worked as a C.I.A. agent in Mexico delivering envelopes full of cash to all and sundry, as he described, once wrote he would rather be ruled by the first 100 names in the Boston telephone directory than by Harvard professors. Unfortunately, the United States is ruled by Harvard professors. Skinner once said to me: "This department is second rate. Lucky to have you here" after a jew physically assaulted me in a Harvard seminar when I said "I don't think conservation is a useful concept" regarding the explanation of an experiment's results using the concept of conservation; later I realised it was because a prominent jewish psychologist, Jean Piaget, prominently uses the concept of conservation to explain similar experimental results in his work. Skinner's calling the Harvard psychology department "second rate" was correct because a department's rating is determined by the best of the faculty there; Skinner was by far the best and he was second rate, as I explain below; the rest were third and fourth rate. Skinner wrote in an autobiographical essay in his Festschrift that at the beginning of his career an older psychologist told him "It takes one little idea to be a success in American psychology" and wrote 'he measured the idea with a thumb and forefinger' -- meaning a homunculus, a spirit or 'soul'. Skinner decided to be successful by radically denying the existence of any spirit or soul through his 'radical behaviorism'. Skinner's basic motivation was, in true American fashion, to be a "success" (as a businessman is called 'successful') which had no provision for intellectual integrity; this is what made him second rate. At the end of his 'Verbal Behavior' he says 'a science of verbal behavior makes no provision for "truth or certainty" though "we can't even be sure of the truth of that".' In other words, he was saying truth was not a useful concept in his science of verbal behavior. Skinner was considered a "giant", an all-time great in the history of human thought, towering like Plato and Aristotle and, for many, eclipsing them, because such psychological theories as to the basic nature of man underpin philosophy and religion as well and Skinner was all over these fields, particularly philosophy. The Harvard psychology department, like other U. S. psychology departments, was dominated by jews and their primary motivation was maintaining jewish control over the field and over academia. In his Festschrift essay, Skinner also wrote that perhaps he has tried to overcome his "early fear of theological ghosts" through his radical behaviorism. In my last meeting with him (on March 23 or 24, 1978), in which I brought up the concept of time and Einstein's twin paradox, I said (rhetorically as a question, actually as an assertion or proposition) "Is it true that everything exists at all times and that things 'pass' [mockingly with an American pronunciation and with a stern face implying disapproval of American negligence which cannot even preserve pronunciation over a few generations and was an indicator of general intellectual sloppiness and inferiority; compare the precision of pronunciation, not just words, with which the Vedas and other works have been transmitted orally over millenia] is an illusion?" -- because his fear of theological ghosts was also a fear of death, also shown by his emphasis on 'survival' as the ultimate value. Skinner dodged the question by asking, rhetorically, "Illusion??" but I heard him say several years later in a lecture in the Boston area "When I die, I will cease to exist", which was his answer to my rhetorical question. My reference to Einstein, who never conducted any experiments except 'thought experiments' and whose work was purely theoretical, was also a refutation of Skinner's position, both in his published work and to me personally, which held any one who has not done any laboratory experimental work has done no worthwhile scientific work -- and my paper in BEHAVIORISM was purely theoretical -- though, as I have said, my laboratory work with rats, which I was forced to stop in 1974, if and when completed, will revolutionise biology and medicine, as well as physics. Later, in a published account, his assistant, a jew who participated in crimes against me at Harvard, recalled Skinner's implied acknowledgment of the jew Einstein's superiority over him but Skinner never had the integrity to retract his crimes, through jews, through the C.I.A. and others, against me which have continued to this day. Once Skinner said to me "You don't get support because you are brilliant, or that you do brilliant work". When I asked him what, then, gets support, he replied "It's a business". In fact, it is not even business but robbery of the worst kind. The C.I.A.'s Skinner-assigned agenda with respect to me is to steal my work through the 24-hour satellite surveillance of me, but denying me all 'reinforcement' -- that is recognition/reward/the wherewithal for life, etc. -- except of the kind through which laboratory pigeons are induced to peck a key tens of thousands of times for each grain of food, so their beaks are worn down to their skin and their face muscles swell, while inflicting the worst kind of verbal injuries (such as calling me delusional or schizophrenic, threatening to put me in a mental hospital, calling me ugly or stupid as K. Subrahmanyam does in comments he posted on my articles at merinews.com and C.I.A.-RAW operatives regularly do on any online forum I go to, etc. etc.) and material injuries (robbing me of career, life, any income, a place to live or work, as well as money, properties, etc. I already had in India, tampering with my eye medication in transit and making me blind for two years, etc. etc.) on me -- including by contacting people I come in contact with and, use rewards (examples of which I have given below and include Amartya Sen, Subramanian Swamy, the Japanese academic, an Indian, Vinod Gupta, from my residence hall at I.I.T. Kharagpur who was made a bosom pal of the Indian president, Shankar Dayal Sharma, overnight, holding his wedding in Rashtrapati Bhavan, made a bosom pal of Bill Clinton when president, others in various walks of life including jounalists, politicians, etc.), harassment (such as blocking their mail and threatening to ruin their business or deprive them of their job or jailing them as in the case of the Editor-Publisher of the Indian newspaper in New York which carried front page reports with banner headlines on crimes against me, forcing the Indian Institute of Advanced Study in Shimla, by "a committee of secretaries" of the Indian government voting to force it out of the buildings it was housed in and I. I. T. Kanpur, by cutting the I. I. T. s' budget and putting a freeze on hiring, to abandon any plans to offer me a position) and, if necessary, murder (examples of which I have given below, including the torture and murder of a muslim newspaper cartoonist in Delhi, of Rajiv and Indira Gandhi, of Indian and American scientists from whom I might have received support) to induce aggression, harassment or injuries by them toward me -- and RAW and all other Indians, in government, the media and elsewhere, have been participating in this with great gusto. As I said in my letter to the press dated February 26, 2005 (below) "American press reports 3-4 years ago referred to satellite-based technology the United States has had in place to monitor "the conversations of foreign leaders" (not just conversations over the telephone or other electrical/electronic media though it includes ability to monitor electrical/electronic communications of all kinds also). Since at least 1977, the United States has been able to keep individuals under 24-hour video and audio surveillance by satellite. Psychologist B. F. Skinner of Harvard made no secret of "my spies" keeping me under such surveillance, one use of which is a C.I.A. program started by Skinner to "control" a targeted individual's behavior by various verbal (including the use of conditioned stimuli, ratio schedules, etc.) and other means. I was targeted primarily due to Skinner's personal motivation flowing from the fact that I had exposed his plagiarism and destroyed his school of psychology but also because I have been the only threat to the United States' ability to keep India economically, technologically and militarily weak and under its boots (in part through my 'influence' on Prime Minister Indira Gandhi --about which Skinner asked "How about your political contacts on either side-- Mrs. Gandhi?" though I had not breathed a word about any such 'contacts' -- and former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi-- both of whom were assassinated for this reason by India's Research and Analysis Wing on the C.I.A.'s orders). But it would have been surprising if the United States had not used such surveillance and control over other foreign leaders. An article in a Russian newspaper by an American capitalist consultant on Russia a couple of months ago referred to "the mysteriously self-destructive behavior" of Russia's leaders, referring to the dismantling of the benefits system (the same system of benefits can be administered by private contractors, if desired, who will be paid by the government and those who got free transportation before can still get free transportation), but such behavior started in the mid-eighties, with Mikhail Gorbachev. It is more than likely that similar surveillance and control has been used against Soviet/Russian leaders." ADDED ON MAY 1, 2009: I have said above that the classical culture, of which Greece was one branch, only exists in rural North India now and it is about to be wiped out with the advent of television. To prevent American intellectual and moral inferiority from destroying India and mankind, it is imperative that all American and other Western media, broadcast, print and, selectively, Internet, be immediately expunged from India and a massive re-education program be undertaken, through educational institutions, particularly primary and secondary schools, educational curricula and the print and broadcast media to reverse the damage already done. This does not mean that India cannot bring in the semester and trimester system in its colleges and universities, use Western scientific journals, etc. The CULTURE must be preserved. This cannot wait for ANYTHING. This is the virus India has to fear the most and do the most to kill and immunise against. What I said in the letter dated May 11, 2005 below is worth repeating:- "A headline says "American multi-media empire to expand its presence in Russia". More than "infrastructure facilities, defense enterprises, natural monopolies, and the development of strategic natural resources", countries need to guard their information sources. Information sources can make you see white as black and black as white (see, for example, my letter dated April 25, 2005, below, pointing out that the Soviet system was far more equal and, therefore, far more democratic). More than mad cow disease, countries need to protect their citizens from debilitation and death via information sources. It is information imperialism (formal education is part of information sources) that keeps India in the most abject slavery (see letter dated January 5 '04, below); it was to maintain information imperialism that India's greatest scientist, whose work was in the mainstream of Western science, was publicly tortured in a Harvard seminar and it is information imperialism that has kept India's puppet government, media (I have described over the years some of the huge operation of carrots and sticks by which India's Research and Analysis Wing has kept Indian media from reporting on him, on the C.I.A.'s orders) and citizenry participating to the hilt in crimes against him for the past 28 years (see letter dated February 26, 2005, below). It is surrender to the information imperialism of the West (which started with a refusal by TASS in New York to report on the persecution-- whose nature and extent is unprecedented in the history of mankind--of the above Indian scientist) that is responsible for Soviet/Russian self-destruction over the past 20 years which will continue at an accelerating pace under current plans. It is information imperialism that keeps countries of the world from taking advantage of my proposal about money (see letters below). An example of information imperialism and India's continued slavery is a news item in the Indian press today about a statement of India's prime minister on the way back from the May 9 celebration in Moscow in which he celebrates the two million Indians who fought in World War II and tens of thousands who died. In fact, both in World War I and II, millions of Indians fought whoever and wherever their British colonial masters wanted them to and not a single one of them fought their British colonial masters who had enslaved them. Pakistan's legislature has protested a cartoon in an American newspaper showing Pakistan as a dog loyal to Washington. But India is equally a dog loyal to the white master. Russia is half way to becoming a dog loyal to Washington." The concepts of both democracy and dictatorship in the West are taken from Greece. Dictators were appointed in Greece to deal with certain situations. The situation in India now demands a dictator. A dictator is needed to build India's economy through my proposal about money (below), its nuclear arms as I have described above and below as well as preserve its culture. The elections in progress must be halted and a dictator appointed. That dictator can only be me. I am the sage in a Himalayan cave, the philosopher-king that is talked about in political science, the concept that was responsible for Nehru appointing a professor of Indian philosophy at Oxford University, S. Radhakrishnan, India's first Vice President then President and for N. T. Ramarao, on first becoming Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, pitching a little tent in a forest (in Kashmir?) as his abode. Toward the end of his business life, the grandfather mentioned above, with his wife, went on a pilgrimage to all the major sites up to Rameshwaram and, before he left, all the businessmen, shop keepers, etc. came out to touch his feet as he walked home through the main market; the Vindhya range does not break up India. Nor should C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored insurgencies in C.I.A.-RAW-ruled India. There were never any passports or barriers between the hundreds of kingdoms, large and small, including Nepal, that were India and any Indian could go and live anywhere in the subcontinent that was India; nor should there be now. But the firangis have to be expelled from the subcontinent and neutralised against doing any mischief. For that India needs a dictator. From the barbarous, wild West, India has to reclaim its superior, meditative civilisation and way of life. The ignorant and criminal Harvard professors, like Skinner (see above), who rule the United States, love "fine wines", are debauched and depraved and violent. They want Indians to be their slaves. (The lack of intellectual integrity -- see above -- was not limited to Skinner. Professors of Physics at M.I.T. know about the overcoming of gravity by thousands of U. S. practitioners of an Indian meditative discipline I have mentioned below -- which has profound implications for the nature of gravity and inertia, as I said on April 5, '05, December 5 '04, December 1 '04 and November 19 '04 below and represents a superior understanding of gravity and inertia, not to mention what it says about the nature of man and his relationship to the world -- and a few of them practise it themselves but an M. I. T. professor, when I tried to document the phenomenon through an administrative assistant at M. I. T. whom I was teaching 'Verbal Behavior' and who told me about this professor being a practitioner of this discipline including the overcoming of gravity during meditation, would not give a written account of it and there is never any acknowledgment of this all-important phenomenon in journals of Physics). Do I have to explain further (see addendums of December 12 '06 to January 9 '07 & of March 18 '09, etc.) how they are turning the populations of India (and China) into their slave workers who suck up the output of ten times as many other Indians while contributing nothing to India's economy, so that in addition to the millions of direct slave labourers, ten times as many other Indians are the indirect slave labourers of the Americans and all India gets in return is dollars which can only ultimately be used to buy American goods and services which, through the multiplier effect I have described, helps the U. S. economy not India's, or to buy worthless American paper (most of India's foreign exchange reserves of hundreds of billions of dollars are in U. S. government paper) which is ultimately only as good as India's ability to militarily enforce the obligations it represents which India has no way of doing and, even if enforced, will help the U. S., not India's economy and which, in multifarious ways, increases the United States' power over India? The government of India today is a government of traitors, regardless of which political party forms the government. Only I, as a dictator, can free India from this slavery and give it true prosperity and Independence. To destroy its enemies, India has to practise superior violence against them. For this India has to renounce pacifism, aim for nuclear supremacy over the United States and make first use of nuclear weapons against the United States. Only I can do that. It was an M. I. T. professor of Business/Economics (the dean of its Business School, as I recall) who suggested some years ago that India start doing the "backroom" work for American companies to provide jobs for its people, the kind of slave work which, like all "outsourced" work, I refer to, above and below, as being extremely harmful to and exploitative of India, besides being unnecessary. In a pamphlet titled "Crime in Academia and Psychology, and B. F. Skinner", distributed by me, through Boston University students, one Indian and one American, to people going in to hear B. F. Skinner at Boston University in February 1984 and, later, elsewhere, I showed how U. S. universities function as a crime syndicate, in a close relationship with the U. S. government and media. People who they gave the pamphlet to, many of whom knew what was in it, demanded with hostility, from the Indian "Then why are you here?" and he stopped distributing it, though the American continued. The Indian then came to me where I was watching the distribution from a distance and demanded back his telephone number he had given me and I gave it back to him. I have referred above (addendum dated April 16, 2009) about Bush telling Jaswant Singh about “the immense talent of Indians [meaning myself] and the immense wealth [they] have given” to the U.S. (see my letter dated April 13, 2001 in http://media.www.thecurrentonline.com/media/storage/paper304/news/2001/10/15/Opinions/Web-Submission.Terrorism-129474.shtml?page=1 and letters about stock market manipulation). I was watching, on television at Boston University -- I did not have a television -- the movement of stock market indices showing the manipulation of the stock markets by the U. S. Treasury -- the kind of thing to take advantage of which the U. S. Treasury Secretary left his job and went to Wall Street, as I describe in the addendum dated April 16 '09 above -- when the C. I. A. sent a campus policeman to stop my monitoring of the stock market. As the Indian government, under direction of C. I. A.-RAW, regularly does, Boston University then started regularly inviting Amartya Sen to give distinguished lectures at Boston University; this is their way of providing cover for crimes against me and against India. When I was living in an M. I. T. library, that used to be open 24-hours, for six and a half months, sleeping on the chairs at night and going without food for up to three weeks at a time, all the Indian graduate students were aware of what was happening. The head of the Indian organisation at M. I. T. asked me, "Racism?". I said 'Yes' and he told me not to bother returning a dime he had lent me to make a telephone call. This was the extent of the solidarity they showed toward me. A Tamil Indian visiting M. I. T. from an Indian university and nearing completion of his Ph.D. in Chemistry paid me $5 a week to teach him philosophy of science once a week, while I lived in that library, which I used to buy puffed rice as food for a while -- not nearly enough to prevent considerable loss of weight -- but then started talking about "discrimination" against Tamils in India and stopped. I was down to about half my normal weight from starvation. All the Indians at M. I. T. were aware of what was happening and one exclaimed to me on the street "You have lost a lot of weight!" C. I. A.-RAW sent an official from the Indian Ministry of Science and Technology to reassure them that the Indian government cares about them. When I later took shelter in the Iranian graduate student's dormitory suite as his guest, referred to above, I was similarly starving and an Indian graduate student who also lived in the suite would bring his Indian friends over for coffee and say to them, in Hindi (he was Hindi-speaking), for my benefit (he never spoke to me directly), 'If you start talking like that, the C. I. A. gets after you!' (I had never mentioned the C. I. A. to any one till then; the Indians must have figured it out themselves) but knowing that the C. I. A. was after me and I was starving did not stop this Indian from falsely accusing me of stealing a handful of cereal, at which an M. I. T. policeman said to them, questioningly, "If he is stealing things, we will lock him up!", seeking their acquiescence in locking me up; they remained silent and I was spared, merely forced out in the street. (I had stood first amongst all branches of engineering in the merit-ranking exam at I. I. T., Kharagpur, the 'M. I. T. of India', in 1961, won first prizes in the annual English debating, Hindi debating, English essay and General Knowledge contests in 1964, the only year I took part in these contests, was elected president of the departmental society in my final year and nominated by the department chairman for the Best Graduate of the Institute award). The crimes against me by this crime syndicate are fully reflected in crimes against India as a whole. In the published letter I referred to in the addendum dated April 11, 2009 above, I said that India has to stop sending students abroad to end the phenomenon of "inferior, seditious" Indians going crazy at a hint of a smile from the White Master. Indian universities will not improve unless this is stopped and the money India spends in foreign exchange every year on sending students abroad is instead spent in rupees -- even more, much more, can be spent in rupees -- and ploughed into Indian universities instead. See what I have said below, in the press release dated November 8, 2008 and the letter dated January 5, 2004 about what Indian higher education and research should be. The Soviet Union had dozens of closed cities -- entire cities -- dedicated to research and development whose very existence was a secret. I have said in the letter dated January 5, 2004 below that Indian scientists can form research communities by themselves and the results of their work need not be shared with the outside world. There is a hoary tradition in the United States of crime syndicates controlling and, in many cases, appointing judges. There have been judges, including Federal judges, who have been impeached and removed because of their connections to crime syndicates; I sent friend-of-the-court briefs in the cases of two such Federal judges who were removed in recent years because of their connections to crime syndicates. Often they are prosecuted on the grounds of some trivial infraction such as a minor error made by his tax preparer in preparing his income tax return in the case of one of these judges, but everyone concerned knows what the real reason for the prosecution and impeachment is. Since Harvard University professors rule the United States, its power of appointing judges to cover or abet its crimes is extraordinary. It appointed the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts to cover up and abet its crimes against me; a banner headline in the Indian newspaper in New York whose Editor-Publisher was jailed for several years for carrying stories about the crimes against me had referred to my intention to sue Harvard University for its entire endowment -- which at the time stood at five billion dollars -- for the crimes against me. The current Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts is the wife of a New York Times columnist my letter to whom, ending with 'I am writing to ask that you use your column to bring these crimes by your countrymen against an Indian scientist and what it shows about the fraud and crime, with genocidal intent, collectively practised by Americans against India and perhaps other countries to light', was the last page of the pamphlet referred to above. As Harvard University has done regarding many other people who come to know about the crimes against me -- see the example of the Japanese academic above whose book was published by Harvard University Press as a bribe which completely changed his behavior -- the wife of the columnist was first made the chief lawyer of Harvard University and then Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. She showed her judicial impartiality recently by dismissing a case I had filed against a Harvard professor for making me blind for two years -- in a way that shocked his colleagues who repeatedly urged me to sue him -- by referring to the defendant as 'Dr. so-and-so' and to me, the Plaintiff, simply as "Chandra" in the judgment. By controlling the C.I.A., this crime syndicate controls India's RAW and, by controlling RAW, it controls India's courts; one example of this was India's Supreme Court claiming to have lost a case I filed after acknowledging it at the highest level, the crime about which the Indian newspaper in New York -- whose Editor-Publisher was jailed for several years for carrying stories about me -- had carried another lead report on the front page. There are other examples of Indian courts covering up the crimes against me, one of which involved a BJP politician having been jailed for a long time for having in his possession a copy of a telegram I had sent to the Thakkar Commission of Inquiry -- which went into the assassination of Indira Gandhi -- in response to the Commission's letters to me, copies of which telegram I had sent in a press release to all the major press organs and political parties, a front page report in an English newspaper published in Delhi featuring a full-size photograph of that press release, etc. The jailing of the BJP politician was meant to intimidate all politicians, as well as media, against doing anything that would expose the crimes against me. The politician was arrested on the grounds of having in his possession classified material -- that is, my press release containing my telegram to the Thakkar Commission -- and the front page report in the Delhi newspaper featuring a large reproduction of my press release, containing a large reproduction of my telegram -- was used to secure the politician's release by showing that the press release could not have been classified material since that Delhi newspaper carried a front page report containing a large, fully legible, reproduction of the press release containing a large, fully legible reproduction of the telegram. But the jailing of that BJP politician for a long time -- like the torture-murder of the muslim newspaper cartoonist I have referred to below -- served the purpose of intimidating everyone concerned against doing anything that might expose the C.I.A.-RAW's crimes against me. There are many such examples. The New York Times columnist, the (above) Chief Justice's husband, is most proud of his book 'Gideon's Trumpet' expressing his profound respect for the judiciary and this was a frequent theme of his columns. There could not have been a more effective bribe than to make his wife Chief Justice whom he presumably fucks -- yes, this four-letter word, which I have never used in the past and do not plan to in the future, is now a regular feature in stories in respected American magazines such as The New Yorker. Arundhati Roy, whose pornographic novel got her the Booker Prize and fame and status in India as well, uses this word as I saw when I happened to glance at a couple lines she had written. It was Hitler who said something to the effect that jews are like an acid that dissolves civilisation. With their control of the U. S. media, including Hollywood, they have turned the American culture as a whole into such an acid. U. S. conservative Jerry Falwell once said "God Almighty does not hear the prayer of a jew" and William F. Buckley's (above) magazine, National Review, quoted "preacher" Jerry Falwell's "chilling remark" that "If God allows America to continue, he will owe an apology to Sodom and Gomorrah". But after bribery of contact, visits to Israel, etc., Falwell became a vocal supporter of Israel. When I wrote my letter in 'Patriot' referred to above (which said 'The so-called pogroms against the jews were the occasional backlash'), the jewish New York Times carried a front page report of another conservative American, Ralph Reed, expressing his opposition to "pogroms" (there have been no pogroms for quite some time now; he said this for my benefit at the request of the jews). When I said above that the C. I. A.'s agenda is to steal my work without giving me credit, it includes many stray remarks of mine. When Bill Clinton as president was facing impeachment and removal from office for having an affair with a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, an American said how this offended "the American people". At that I said, in the presence of dozens of Americans, "The American people will impeach a president who does not have extra-marital affairs". There was utter silence. I added after a few seconds "No one could accuse Nixon of having exta-marital affairs. He was the one who came closest to being impeached". The C. I. A. communicated these remarks to U. S. legislators. All U. S. legislators knew of what the C. I. A. was doing to me and my remarks decided Clinton's fate in his impeachment and trial by U. S. legislators. Later, I said to an American that I saw a photograph of Monica Lewinsky in the New York Times and said "She is not at all attractive. A president can do better than that!" and added "How about chivalry -- she was coming on strong; he felt he had to respond" At this the New York Times reported Clinton said he was 'helping' her. The U. S. legislators then embarked on an examination of the minute details of what Clinton and Lewinsky respectively did. An American was saying in my presence, for my benefit, how going into exactly what Monica Lewinsky did and what Clinton did was important. I said "The sole purpose of this whole thing is to talk about sexual things in public". Clinton was acquitted. He was later reported as saying 'Someone was needed to say the whole thing was [a load of crap].' When I made a negative post on my blog, which also appears on the Times of India blogs website though it is not up to date there, about the United States, K. Subrahmanyam left a comment using the name of Bill Clinton expressing astonishment. Then I realised it was Bill Clinton who had nominated me for inclusion in Who's Who In America. When Vajpayee as prime minister visited Bill Clinton as president, Clinton told him only an Indian's remarks could have saved him from being removed from office. I have referred above to Bush as president telling Jaswant Singh about "the immense talent of Indians [meaning myself] and the immense wealth they have given" to the U. S. It was to steal credit for such respect for India I had brought, without giving me credit -- according to the C. I. A.'s agenda -- that Vajpayee coined the slogan "India Shining" for the 2004 elections. After the 1998 nuclear tests, the Vajpayee government issued "Resurgent India Bonds" and in a letter to the press I referred to 'Resurgent India begging a demon king to "allow" it to arm itself while the Indian responsible for the resurgence (see above) cannot find a place to live and work in India'. Upon my reference to Clinton as a king, demon or not, the hue and cry and the impeachment proceedings against him vanished overnight because a king, after all, is entitled to his pleasures; news photos showed Hillary Clinton with a downcast look while other news photos showed Bill Clinton's aides beaming at the new Clinton reborn as a king and the New York Times commented 'remeber what it was like yesterday (regarding the impeachment hue and cry) and what it's like today!' Some other remark of mine later on revived the proceedings. The Americans have given a new meaning to Milton's (in "On His Blindness") "His state is kingly. Thousands at his bidding speed over land and oceans". Advani recently said that Vajpayee can "comprehend" everything but cannot speak or communicate, so Vajpayee does not have to answer questions about his participation in the C. I. A.'s crimes against me. But if these two are tortured, they will both admit Vajpayee can speak and communicate just like in the past. Does the media black out by RAW of news about the greatest living Indian -- India's natural ruler -- affect elections? Absolutely. Does the dictatorial power the Election Commission has to order the government about any thing that affects elections apply to this? Absolutely. Can the Election Commission halt the elections till this media black out is lifted and the Indian public properly informed about what and who is being suppressed? Absolutely. ADDED ON MAY 3, 2009: The following E-Mail has been sent to the Election Commission, New Delhi, today:- Date: May 3, 2009 From: Satish Chandra Telephone: 01-617-282-4996 FAX: 01-617-825-4973 E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com To: Members of the Election Commission, New Delhi C/O feedback@eci.gov.in, ashishs@eci.gov.in, kakumar@eci.gov.in, rksrivastava@eci.gov.in, kfwilfred@eci.gov.in, ystandhope@eci.gov.in, skrudola@eci.gov.in, jaipriye@eci.gov.in, balakrish@eci.gov.in, dralokshukla@eci.gov.in Dear Sirs: With reference to the last paragraph of the addendum dated May 1, 2009 below: this is to request that the Election Commission take the action suggested therein. Sincerely, Satish Chandra CC: Major Indian media organs ---------------------------------------------------------- I have referred above to saying "No one could accuse Nixon of having extra-marital affairs. He was the one who came closest to being impeached". Before that I said to an American "JFK [John F. Kennedy] used to share mistresses with mafia bosses. "He was a handsome guy. He was entitled to it" -- this was a librarian. It's so ridiculous". When I ran for the Lok Sabha in 1996 from East Delhi, a woman referred to my face ["chehra"] as the reason she will vote for me. Americans who wanted me to mate with their wives or offered me their teen-age daughters referred to "how handsome" I was, as did some Americans who did not try to have me mate with their wives. An Indian woman in Detroit said about an Indian woman friend of hers "She thought you are extreeeeeeeeeeeeeeemely handsome". Growing up my handsomeness was kept a carefully guarded secret from me and it has never been a part of my self-concept and I do not see anything remarkable when I look in the mirror. In a course on measurement of intelligence in a doctoral program in clinical psychology, I volunteered to take an IQ test while the rest of the class scored my answers. A class-mate told me after the test that the IQ scale does not go high enough to score my IQ. The professor of another course, in psychotherapy, in the same program, in 1971-72, said to me, standing outside the classroom, "There are TWO things"; only recently I have realised he was giving an explanation of the extraordinary aggression I evoke from people -- some examples of which occurred in that classroom -- and the two things were my intelligence and my handsomeness. At Harvard, the people who referred to my being a "genius" and "extreeeeeeeeeeeeeemely" intelligent also set up the physical assault and numerous other crimes against me. Apparently the rare combination of extreme intelligence and extreme handsomeness evokes aggression like a red rag from a bull. Such a person ought to be provided with security (above) for this reason alone. But I am also India's only hope and the saviour of mankind. See what I said above, on March 20, 2009, about India's classical culture. Some Americans who have known me figured out Indians are "Greek" based on just my looks. My caller I.D. once showed a call from the cell phone of America's biggest movie and media mughal; perhaps he wanted to profit from my handsomeness. But India has been denied profiting from me, except for India's repeatedly aborted strategic program and Vajpayee's fraudulent claim of "India Shining", though I was born in India. It is the Dravidian blood in Indians that is responsible for this. It is not too late for Indians to come to their senses. They must not let the Dravidians amongst them, such as traitor K. Subrahmanyam who burns with envy and jealousy of an Aryan North Indian, destroy India. A popular name for males in India for thousands of years has been "Shyam Sunder", which literally translates as "Dark Beautiful" -- the source of the American slogan from the 1960's "Black is beautiful". An American woman guide showing medieval Indian paintings to visitors to a Harvard museum would have liked to explain how very dark-skinned heroes such as Krishna were shown cavorting with very light-skinned gopis as a matter of deliberate social engineering, but was prevented by my presence in the group from doing so. India has been subject to this and other propaganda such as pacifism for thousands of years which served a purpose once but now has become self-destructive. After the IQ test above after which a non-jewish classmate told me the IQ scale does not go high enough to score my IQ, the jewish professor of that course who got his Ph.D. in Psychology under the jew at Harvard who later physically assaulted me in a Harvard seminar (see above), said to me my performance in the IQ test was due to my having been a "Math major". If the IQ score were so strongly affected by what subjects one studied in college, IQ tests will have absolutely no validity or utility. A jew, Herrnstein, in the Harvard psychology department, who got his Ph.D. under Skinner and was among those who participated in the crimes against me at Harvard, was famous for his books and articles (such as "IQ in the Meritocracy") on the great utility and validity of IQ tests which, incidentally, showed the intelligence of blacks to be inferior to that of whites. Skinner, who referred to my "deep, deep understanding" of his position, said this to me about Herrnstein's scholarship: "He was my STUDENT for (x) years, he has been my COLLEAGUE for (y) years and he still misunderstands me!" (After, in a letter to National Review, I referred to Herrnstein being "intellectually third rate", Herrnstein quickly got lung cancer which progressed very fast and he died; certain kinds of stress affects the immune system in specific ways. Similarly, when a reporter for the Indian newspaper in New York I have mentioned above called Skinner to ask questions about my case, Skinner's cancer of the mouth flared up and he quickly died). In the psychotherapy course above, the jewish professor who told me "There are TWO things" as the explanation for the extraordinary aggression I evoke later sent a campus policeman who accosted me outside the men's washroom and demanded I come with him to the police post. I insisted he tell me what it is about. Then he said he checked the registration of my car with the state authority and it is not in their computer. I showed him the registration card I had in my wallet and said 'Tell them to check their computer again'. The idea was to take me to the police station to rough me up or do some other injury on the pretext of this fraudulent 'reason'. A non-jewish professor who had just gone into the washroom during this said later "Satish, the fuzz [slang for police] got you!" I told him what happened and he said "It is normal". Later, that jewish professor of psychotherapy apparently said something in the regular faculty meeting which told this non-jewish professor it was that professor of psychotherapy who had sent the policeman to rough me up, or do worse. I got an 'A' in that course in psychotherapy, one of only two 'A's awarded in that course. A jewish classmate got an 'F' (Fail) and came and complained to me. I said "That's absurd! What is he trying to do?! ... He is trying to get attention; just ignore it". When people in the class were asked to vote as to whose client will get better and whose will not, only mine was predicted to get better. My jewish classmate who got a failing grade in that course in individual psychotherapy got his Ph.D. in clinical psychology in three years. I did not get it even after six years, though I had already published a paper about which the journal editor wrote me "Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field", about which B. F. Skinner, voted by American psychology department chairpersons as the most influential living psychologist and, along with Freud, one of the two most influential psychologists of all time, had written to me "...want to tell you, while the spell is on me, how much I admire what you have done. You have made a much more courageous use of the autoclitic and atomic operant than I did, with breath-taking results ... Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward moving ...", a paper which had an impact such as no single paper in the history of psychology has ever had (see my letter dated April 28, 2006 to the press below about what happened in a question and answer session of Skinner with thousands of his followers in the Grand ballroom of the Hilton Hotel in Chicago in May, 1977). That paper sent waves of sensation in that psychology department right after I wrote and submitted it as part of the requirements for my Ph.D. and an elderly jewish professor in the department, who had been Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at the university and his younger non-jewish colleague -- who were co-instructors of a course I had taken earlier -- got multi-colored striped pants identical to the ones I wore and sort of followed me around for a couple of days. Even before I wrote that paper, a letter from me was considered decisive as to which faculty member got tenure and which did not and young faculty members up for tenure would try to butter me up -- one showed me a book in his hand and pointedly told me it was a book in philosophy, because it was known I had an interest in philosophy ---and actively solicited letters from me to the committee that decided on tenure. I wrote a letter to the tenure committee in favor of a faculty member who had not a ghost of a chance of getting tenure or having his contract renewed. The chairman of the tenure committee told me of his numerous shortcomings -- he comes late, he is this, he is that; I did not budge and he got his contract renewed over the opposition of everyone. I knew the kind of upheaval that paper of mine will cause and I waited two years before sending it for publication. The Editor of the first and only journal I sent it to called me with profound emotion about a day after he received it -- I cannot reproduce the things he said -- and then wrote to me "Heartiest congratulations on what I regard to be a major contribution to work in the field". When I told an Indian post-doctoral fellow in Physics at the university whom I knew about the editor's call, he said to me in Hindi "Dar rahe the" (You were scared!") regarding the delay in my sending it for publication. I replied it was "Due caution" on my part (because I knew the upheaval it will cause and I had told other Indians, right after I wrote it, it will change the course of the history of psychology). Later events showed that my caution was fully justified. After I had written that paper, when I said to a professor in that department that my notes, etc., I had used to write that paper were in a "box", he said "Don't open that box, or you will have to do it without the Ph.D." (after this paper I was saying I will expand it to book length and the chairman of my program committee had suggested I write a series of papers -- an outline of which was in the paper I had written -- for the number one journal in the field of psychology; he was the one who was being denied contract renewal but got it because of my letter despite everyone's opposition). This professor also told me of their program of slavery for me -- that I will not be given the Ph.D., will have to write a dozen or so papers for which they -- the faculty -- will take credit, not me and eventually, perhaps, get the Ph.D. several years after the years I had already spent in that doctoral program in Psychology. Numerous calls from psychologists around the world who had read my paper calling to invite me to speak, etc. were kept from me, as was most of my mail and, as part of the conspiracy, the behavior of faculty members toward me quickly became very brutal and violent. A faculty member put a note in my mailbox "You cannot fire us. Slaves must be sold". During my first year in that doctoral program in clinical psychology, an American woman who was a practitioner of an Indian meditative discipline, apparently came seeking help. My classmate who told me the IQ scale does not go high enough to score my IQ sent her to me thinking I will be able to help her. But I knew nothing about that meditative discipline. Another classmate of mine -- who complained to me about being given a failing grade in the course in individual psychotherapy -- was himself a practitioner of that discipline, having learnt it formally, and sent me to a psychologist at the Veterans Administration hospital, where he was interning, who was a practitioner of that meditative discipline and this psychologist, whose original specialty was physiological psychology, taught me how to meditate in an informal, two hour session. When I told this woman, who was a formal teacher of this discipline with the organization whose trade mark this form of meditation was and had been directed to me by my classmate, about having been taught it by the psychologist at the Veterans Administration hospital informally without going through the formal procedure, paying the fee, etc., she went and chastised that psychologist for breaking the rules. In a course in the History of Psychology -- which had not a trace, a whisper or a hint of India having contributed anything to the field of psychology -- each student had to choose a topic, from a list provided, to give a presentation to the class. I chose the topic "The Self". I thought it will be good if I gave a presentation focusing on India's treatment of the concept of 'Self' -- because my classmate sending that woman to me and another classmate sending me to the psychologist at Veterans Administration hospital made me think this was something expected and welcome from me -- on which a LOT of work has been done in India throughout history (see letter dated April 1, 2005 below), quite secular work, not referring to religion -- and by people such as Swiss psychologist Carl Jung, one of the greatest names in psychology, who has extensively written, over many volumes, about India's treatment of the concept of The Self. I got thirteen books in English from the University's main library on India's treatment of the concept of The Self by Americans and some Indians, not Europeans, and studied them to prepare for the presentation. About 8 P.M. the evening before the presentation, I decided I was not ready to give a presentation on the Indian concept of 'Self' and prepared a presentation based strictly on the work in mainstream American social psychology which has absolutely nothing in common with India's treatment of 'Self', for which I also had materials on hand. This was 1971-72 and during the India-Pakistan war that year, the campus newspaper had carried a cartoon by a Washington Post cartoonist showing emaciated Indians with begging bowls next to tanks and artillery, making fun of the poor, starving Indians engaging in activity such as warfare. In defence of both India and Pakistan I wrote a letter, which appeared both in the Washington Post and the campus newspaper, in response to that cartoon saying, in part, something like the following: 'They are fighting over real estate and over issues that touch human beings in their core, such as religion ... Compare the frivolous reasons which led to World War I and the megalomania that was responsible for World War II ...' and, at the end, referred to 'ignoring the very reasons that give rise to war'. This letter defending both India and Pakistan for their temerity in engaging in an activity such as war was taken by the jews as an excuse to throw me out of the department; the non-jewish classmate above told me "they [meaning the jews or faculty members] are going to throw you out". I replied "Are you kidding? I am their favorite student. I will see you in class". For any Indian who wants to be allowed to 'succeed' in the United States, it is absolutely essential that he participate in the Americans' running India down as a poor, starving, backward country. The Indian named Vinod Gupta (above), from my residence hall at IIT, Kharagpur, worth hundreds of millions of dollars who was made a bosom pal of both the Indian president and of Bill Clinton as president as part of moves to isolate me, says about his family in India "Sometimes we did not have FOOD", though I know he is from a U.P. bania family and never had to starve. I had written to a Harvard professor of Political Science who had been the United States' National Security Adviser, about what happened to me at Harvard, after which he began bringing Indian graduate students to his department and one of them -- who was made Editor of the prestigious Foreign Affairs magazine, principal organ of the Council on Foreign Relations and then Editor of the international edition of Newsweek and was given their annual award by South Asian journalists in the U.S. and of whom his jewish mentor from the New York Times said he wants to see him the National Security Advisor of the United States -- when he came to be interviewed on a Boston radio station, the first thing he said about India was "First of all, it is very POOR". Make no mistake about it, when Amartya Sen was chosen as the inferior Indian substitute for me for a Nobel prize, it was because the work for which he was given the Nobel prize carries the theme of starvation and famine in India. As for the validity of his thesis, see what I have written above about my starving in the M.I.T. library with the fullest knowledge and participation of all the Indians at M.I.T. and of the Indian and American governments as well as of Amartya Sen later who was brought to Harvard in an operation orchestrated by a prominent jewish professor of Philosophy at Harvard after I gave him a copy of my pamphlet referred to above and later given the Nobel prize under an arrangement with the jews made during a visit by Jethmalani to Israel when he was in Vajpayee's cabinet; as I have said elsewhere, Jethmalani himself was given a law practice of half a million dollars per year for participation in crimes against me. When Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal was chosen to give the Republican party response to Obama's State of the Union address, the only thing he said about his Indian background was "I have seen extreme poverty in India". These are just examples, which illustrate a rule. So my defence of India and Pakistan for their temerity in engaging in activity such as war was taken by the jews as an excuse to throw me out of the department (it was not because of any opposition to war; Skinner contributed to the war effort in World War II by developing a missile guidance system using pigeons and this military work had continued at the lab in Cambridge which also developed the guidance systems for America's moon missions at least till 1980 when someone working on it told me about it), which they wanted to do because I seemed a threat to their control of the field. The professor of this course in the History of Psychology was jewish and this non-jewish classmate had signaled his acquiescence in the jews' throwing me out by something I will not go into. When I finished my presentation, this professor began asking questions in a brutalising tone and voice that can only be used toward a slave and answering which would have established me as a slave; it was meant to drive me out of the department but I did not oblige. The note a non-jewish faculty member left in my mail box three years later saying "Slaves must be sold" referred to that. ADDED ON MAY 5, 2009: A response to the above is the following which I have copied and pasted as it appears in a blog where people who also read the Bharat-Rashak online forum write; the "forum" referred to in it is the Bharat-Rakshak forum:- "I agree with ralphy broadly . Though a news program showed that the polling percentage in dharavi was less than even the more affluent areas. On a different note some people in the forum guffawed about an african space program.Now this kind of thing just won't do. In the process of development we should not become like the west in our outlook. africa has a legitimate right to a space program and I look forward to a day when they will land people on the moon! Power to africa!and uber rakshaks please stop behaving like the goras that you so profer to despise. this is why when NRIs get rogered in the west , I tend to look the other way. remember after India , africa is the future. here I would refer to adam smith and his wealth of nations. 11:18 PM" When he refers to 'NRIs getting rogered in the West', he is referring to what I have written above about my experiences. He lives in Delhi and apparently works for the Indian government because he referred to having been present in a signing ceremony with Kakodkar, etc., regarding the nuclear deal. In an article, titled "Crime In Psychology and the I.Q. Matter" that I published in a black-owned Florida newspaper almost twenty years ago (no white-owned newspaper, in the Boston area or elsewhere, would publish such an article), which described some of my experiences I have described above, I pointed to the bias against blacks in I.Q. tests by pointing to an item, as an example, in an I.Q. test which requires that a face with Negroid features be judged as less attractive than a Caucasian face for the answer to be correct. When I refer to the jews' motivation being maintaining control over the field of psychology, I have often made the point that it is psychologists and psychological tests, etc., who pass judgment on the relative intelligence and other characteristics, such as criminality (behavior genetics has also been used for this purpose), of various ethnic and racial groups and jews have been in the forefront of asserting the intellectual and moral inferiority (such as 'criminality') of dark-skinned people which is used to justify discrimination against and mistreatment of them. In that article I made the point that my mistreatment occurred despite my intelligence being superior to their own even by their own tests, despite the disadvantage of taking the tests 'in what is a foreign language to me -- English'. The jewish faculty member who tried to explain away my performance on the I.Q. test (above) by saying I had been a 'math major', also went to Africa to get evidence on the inferiority of black people in the matter of intelligence, etc., as I mentioned in that article in the Florida newspaper. The jew at Harvard, under whom he got his Ph.D., who physically assaulted me when I said "I don't think conservation is a useful concept" was presenting the results of an experiment that showed the inferiority of the intelligence of dark-skinned people in Latin America. After the assault, Skinner's jewish assistant, who had set up that pre-planned assault by suggesting I sit near the head of that long seminar table near the professor (after that assault, I had stopped going to that seminar and another jewish professor, who had planned to similarly assault me and was spring-loaded to do so, lunged toward me as I passed near him in the library, since he could not do so in the seminar which I was no longer attending; a female jewish first year graduate student, also in that seminar, similarly lunged at me intimidatingly with a loud exclamation when I pointedly referred to that jew, who had assaulted me, as 'Mister so-and-so' during an exchange with her near where I had a desk; in a meeting with Skinner after that assault in the seminar, I referred to it as "Attempt to intimidate me! Attempt to intimidate me!"; it was in that meeting that Skinner said, "This department is second rate ... Lucky to have you here"; but Skinner himself had tried to degrade and intimidate me -- though not torture me as that jew did -- when, in May, 1976, at a convention of the Association of Behavior Analysis, the organization of thousands of 'behaviorist' psychologists, I approached him -- my paper in BEHAVIORISM had already been written and prepublication copies sent to many psychologists, including Skinner -- "May I shake your hand, Sir; I am Satish Chandra ..." and, after asking which of his books he considered the most important, etc., asked "Would it be correct to say that you used Bacon's method in arriving at the categories in 'Verbal Behavior' ?"-- an innocuous question with no hostile intent, in a way I will not go into and with deliberation I kept stepping back for safety while looking at him as he continued speaking), made a faux 'defence' of dark-skinned people against the charge of inherently inferior intelligence by saying it could be due to the practice of "endogamy" at which the jewish professor who made the assault grinned at "a variable such as endogamy" (which provided a sort of 'environmental' explanation -- social environment in this case -- as an alternative because endogamy results in genetic deterioration). (Note also what I have said above about the problems with the concept of "genes' as it exists). In that seminar, when I was assaulted, there were present two other senior members of the faculty, one jew and the other a non-jew. Before I went to Harvard, I had already received that letter from Skinner saying "How much I admire what you have done... Seldom have I read a paper that seemed to me to contain so much that was new and forward moving...", etc., and Skinner had already suffered that VERY angry confrontation by his own followers in the Grand Ballroom of the Hilton Hotel in Chicago, shouting "SATISH CHANDRA HAS SHOWN ... ", etc. that I have described above and below; that man was expressing the anger against him that was present in his followers and in the convention as a whole, because of my paper, for the monumental fraud he had perpetrated on them and on the world. Before I came to Harvard, I had written to Harvard's Dean, who had sent me the letter of admission, enclosing, in addition to a copy of that letter to me from Skinner, a copy of a letter to me from Herrnstein saying "I am impressed by the material you sent...", etc who had suggested I complete the Ph.D. at the university I was at and come to Harvard as a post-doc. I had already done ten years of graduate work, six years of that in psychology, had already made "a major contribution to work in the field", not to mention what Skinner had written to me, had done all the course work and completed other requirements for the Ph.D., but had been told by the faculty there of the program of slavery they had for me under which they will not allow me to get the Ph.D., I will have to write many more papers, for which they will take the credit, not me, etc. and they had 'dissolved' my program and program committee to force me to beg faculty members to be on a new program committee, get their approval for a new program, etc. under which I could be made to labor many more years, for THEIR benefit, without getting the Ph.D.; in my letter to Harvard's Dean, I wrote "I wonder if it is possible to arrange for me a status and level of support in consonance with my work". In response, I got a letter from the admissions officer saying "I am sorry to inform you that additional support will not be possible" and "May I congratulate you on your recent work and wish you continued success. We look forward to your arrival here in the Fall". At Harvard, I met Skinner who refused to do anything and said I should "truckle" (which means 'bow obsequiously'). Lacking any alternative, I registered for two courses of discussion with Skinner, that seminar which was required for all first year graduate students and, at Skinner's suggestion, a course in the history of psychology (I had already had a course in the history of psychology at the other university and my paper in BEHAVIORISM had CHANGED the course of the history of psychology). I considered my relationship with Skinner to be defined by that letter which began with "Dear Dr. Chandra ...". Skinner's assistant told me Skinner has been "constrained to treat you as a student" by the department. In fact things are very flexible in academia; not long ago, the chairman of the Psychology department at Boston's Northeastern University had a Master's degree in psychology, not a doctorate; I also had a non-terminal Master's in psychology, though I had done all the work and more for a Ph.D. When I was at the University of Rochester, the president of the university, a statistician, had a Master's degree in statistics, not a Ph.D. The jewish faculty member, who was present in that seminar when the other jew made that assault, had come into the class earlier when it was his turn to make a presentation, saying "Are there any foreign students here?" I kept silent but Skinner's assistant pointed a finger at me, though there were several graduate students from other countries in the seminar, including from Canada and Australia. Then I raised my hand. This jewish faculty member then said he asked that so he can speak English slowly and clearly for my benefit. The non-jew who was present in the seminar when the assault on me occurred, was a member of the National Academy of Science -- an honor only distinguished scientists receive; Skinner was its member, though Skinner was the only one in the department who had received the National Medal of Science, the highest U. S. governmental recognition for scientists given by the president of the country in a White House ceremony -- and a mathematical psychologist and, because of my background in engineering, etc. (by the way, some one with a bachelor's degree in engineering makes more money than someone with a Ph.D. in psychology; I had gone into psychology because of an intellectual interest, not as a way of making a living; clinical psychologists, with a Ph.D., have a lower status and required to work under medical doctors -- something that shocked and dismayed me when I learnt of it after going into the doctoral program in clinical psycholgy; in India, someone with a Bachelor's degree in engineering has the same status as a medical doctor with an M.B.B.S. I already had an engineering degree from I.I.T., Kharagpur; a Ph.D. in psychology would have been a step down, not up, for me careerwise; I persisted with it because, as I have said below, even our knowledge of the physical world comes to us through our senses and, so, in a sense a science of psychology is the foundation science of all sciences; effectively, it is experimental philosophy and doctoral degrees in all fields are 'Doctor of Philosophy'; in a doctoral program in Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign which was ranked among the top four doctoral programs in the United States and had a Nobel laureate in the department, I had passed the Ph.D. Qualifying Exam; I had an interest in artificial intelligence, and studying logic, that is used in the design of computers, etc., in which I was co-instructor with another graduate student at Carnegie-Mellon University for a senior and graduate level course, I saw that the human cognitive processes were involved in logic also; as I have said below in the letter dated April 1, 2005, the world and its physical properties are constructed by our perception and thus psychology is the foundation science even of Physics; my rat experiment I have referred to above has implications for Physics as it does for Biology and Medicine; I had gone into clinical psychology because there you can see psychological theories at work and the proof of how good a theory is is in the pudding; going to psychology from engineering seemed too big a leap and I spent two years in an MBA program, choosing a field of concentration which was named "Behavior Science In Industry", as a bridge) this mathematical psychologist was hoping to have me work under him. The assault by that jew which, besides torturing me, treated me as a slave, was meant for the benefit of this non-jew faculty member as well because it was meant to make me, by brute force, their slave. Neither of the two senior faculty members, who were present during the assault, said or did anything. When days after the assault I met Skinner and mentioned it to him, I also said I had been "moping around" and expressed my sorrow at my "relationship with the department" because that outrage was committed in the presence not just of all the graduate students in the seminar but of two senior faculty members with the full knowledge that there will be no consequences for the perpetrator of the assault. After that, as I left the tiny room which had been assigned to me as my office in an area where other graduate students had similar offices, I saw this mathematical psychologist approaching my office with the jewish faculty member who had also been present during the assault, apparently to express 'support' to me but I assumed a weepy expression on my face and walked on past them; nothing they could do or say could be recompense for what had occurred which I described, in a letter dated July 27, 1982 to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi as "the equivalent of an annihilatory nuclear first strike on India" (she wrote back she was "passing it on to my Principal Secretary to deal with it"). Skinner's later asking me about "your political contacts -- Mrs. Gandhi?" -- though I had written to her in her capacity as Prime Minister, not a politician and had not breathed a word to anyone about having any such contacts -- and another senior faculty member of the department, in whose course in the history of psychology Skinner suggested I enrol, saying to me that Skinner's theories were being applied to "China" (meaning my references, in letters to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, as a behavior scientist, to what could be done regarding India's development, etc.) showed that people in that department knew not just about my accomplishment in psychology, which Skinner acknowledged in that letter, but as someone who was to India's prime minister and government much more than any of them, including Skinner, or any other American scientist had been to the American president and government, as a Guru and guide (Mrs. Indira Gandhi, after ending the Emergency and losing the election -- with a lot of misunderstanding on her part of the guidance I was providing because of the psychology department people blocking my communications -- said 'There is no truth that someone was guiding her' because Vajpayee and many others knew about the guidance I was providing her); they carried out that pre-planned assault despite knowing who I was and the image that crossed my mind at the time of the assault was that of a salvo of nuclear-armed missiles launched against India. The thought I had in my mind when returning from that seminar to my office after the assault was "The jews have tried to destroy me; I will destroy the jews". But in fact, the AMERICANS had tried to destroy me and I have to destroy the Americans. The pamphlet, above, that I distributed in February, 1984 to people going in to hear B. F. Skinner at Boston University and, later, elsewhere, began by saying 'Most have heard the suppression of dissenting schools of thought in the USSR by ... the incarceration of dissidents in mental hospitals' and described what happened in the question and answer session Skinner had with his followers in the Grand Ballroom of the Hilton Hotel in Chicago. Before that session, the Editor of BEHAVIORISM had followed me out of a room in which I had just read another paper and, when I mentioned I had heard from Skinner about the paper which appeared in BEHAVIORISM, he asked if Skinner had been "enraged". After the distribution of that pamphlet to people going in to hear Skinner at Boston University in February, 1984, the American student who did the distribution was told by the mathematical psychologist above, who was present when the assault on me in that Harvard seminar occurred and who was now chairman of the Harvard psychology department, that I was a paranoid schizophrenic, that it never happened and I imagined it. At Harvard, Skinner's assistant had demanded that I do a job such as washing dishes in the freshmen's dining hall and added this threat "People are not getting the point! You will either be INSTITUTIONALISED, or DEPORTED, or DEAD". Later Skinner himself suggested I do such jobs. Earlier, Skinner had offered to ease my financial situation by offering me money "from Washington", meaning from the C.I.A. The same paradigm has continued as, for example, when, on August 10 and 11, 2008, K. Subrahmanyam and the C.I.A. Director combined their offer to transfer one crore rupees into my bank account within 48 hours with threats to put me in a mental hospital or in the prison at Guantanamo Bay (see the attachment to this E-mail). When the Indian above says "this is why when NRIs get rogered in the west , I tend to look the other way", he is supporting such treatment of India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, as well as supporting the C.I.A. openly ruling India, as are all other Indians, in government, the media and elsewhere. It is because of such Indians, which includes all politicians, government people, media people and a lot of others, that I have suffered the treatment I have suffered from Americans who have a thoroughly justified contempt for Indians in general who they feel deserve nothing more than to be treated like nigger blackie slaves whose very life and existence is at the mercy of the White Master. Indians are quite happy with that. What I said above on April 16, 2009 is worth repeating:- "Of course the Indians, from the top to the bottom, know about the crimes of the jews against me and against India but are willing to be bought and participate in the crimes, cutting India’s and their own throats. Is it their Dravidian genes that makes them so slavish toward the white man? What implications does it have for their future and for mankind, since so long as they are allowed to exist, they will continue to contaminate the gene pool [note that, as I have explained above, they can contaminate the gene pool without any admixture of blood, by mere existence or proximity], even if they provide useful services as the white man’s slaves at present? Does this make them a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be euthanized en masse? There cannot be a more important subject for public discussion. If the ancient Indians’ great achievements were the products of Aryan genes which, with the passage of time, have become so contaminated by Dravidian genes as to make the Indians’ survival more of a threat than benefit to mankind, the ancient Indians’ achievements are no defence against the extermination of the present day Indians. If, on the other hand, the slavish submissiveness of present day Indians toward the white man is good rather than bad for mankind and it is the aggressiveness of the white barbarians which makes the latter a threat to the future of mankind and fit to be exterminated so that the gentle Indians are liberated, it is the Indians that deserve to survive, not the barbarians of Europe." If it is decided that the Indians do not deserve to be allowed to occupy space on this planet because of the danger they pose to mankind (paragraph above), of course they will have to be euthanised en masse and today's technology makes that possible. Perhaps the Americans and the C.I.A. want ME to make that decision, as to whether to allow the Indians to continue to exist. I would be happy to receive inputs from Indians on this subject. One of the two Federal judges above, who were being prosecuted for bribery or links to organized crime and in whose cases I sent friend-of-the-court briefs, was black and the other white. In the case of the black judge, I pointed to organized criminal activity in academia, including such as that described above, and referred to attacks on blacks who occupy positions "of rank and dignity" -- such as Federal judgeships. I was glad to see the black Federal judge, who was convicted and removed, run for the U.S. Congress, where he has been for many years now and is a good friend of India. ADDED ON MAY 6, 2009: Reportedly India and China are seeking land in Africa to grow food. I suggested below India taking control of Australia militarily, for 'lebensraum' (living space) and other purposes. In the addendum dated May 3, 2009 above I have referred to the invalidity of Amartya Sen's thesis as to starvation and famine. I have repeatedly emphasised that nuclear supremacy over the strongest white country is needed as much for economic reasons as any other. As I have explained, the United States is using Indians and Chinese as slave labour. Supremacy in arms -- which means nuclear supremacy -- is vital for every thing, including the maintenance of national integration and the happiness and loyalty of all its citizens. Many Sikhs came and settled in California as farmers a century ago. There is no reason why India should not aim to take control of California militarily, as the United States invades countries of West Asia/Middle East for its oil. A nuclear first strike with just two twenty kiloton warheads on New York and Washington, accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation, will make this possible along with a lot of other things. The United States has been trying to break-up countries of the Indian subcontinent for a long time, for its own purposes. India can break-up the United States for its own purposes. The United States subjugates governments around the world including the Indian subcontinent for such purposes. India can and must subjugate the United States, break it up and use it for its own purposes. China has such a vision. India can do it much, much faster with a first strike with just two twenty kiloton warheads on New York and Washington, accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. Tiny England, whom Indians so much admire, took possession of two entire continents -- North America and Australia -- and a lot more, including India, for its people. The Americans trying to enslave me (above) has been part of the same movement of enslaving and exploiting other people; the other Indians are already enslaved and I needed to be enslaved. As I have said below in the press release of November 8, 2008, India must "dominate, rather than be dominated by, the intellectually and morally inferior ‘mlecchas’ of the West and do whatever is necessary to enslave and, if necessary, exterminate them. And it WILL be necessary". China is planning to take over Texas, which, along with California and Arizona, etc. was once part of Mexico, in collaboration with Mexico. India can plan to use parts of the American South as well, possibly in collaboration with China and Mexico. Ideally the white population of the United States should be pushed into its Northeast and into Canada, which is almost empty and has an area equal to the United States and, climatewise, will suit the whites very well. (Instead of fighting each other, India, Pakistan and other countries of the subcontinent can collaborate in this enterprise). The United States now has a substantial and rapidly growing population of Mexican origin, already its largest minority which insists on keeping its language and culture and links to Mexico. It can be expected to help, though India can do the whole thing all by itself, too. An article by an Indian 'security expert' in an Indian newspaper is headed "The Missing security expert". There is only one strategic expert India has who is expert and who is not bought up by the Americans. He is missing from India's media. The rest are neither expert nor not bought up. Of course, he is more than India's only strategic expert. He is father of India's strategic program. He is more than that. He is India's greatest scientist. He is more than that. He is India's only hope for its economic and technological salvation. He is more than that. He is India's sovereign. He is more than that. He is Dispenser of India's Destiny ("Bharat Bhagya Vidhata") who will decide whether Indians should be allowed to occupy space on this planet. See addendum dated November 7, 2008 below for what was said when a Pakistani on Pakistan Defence Forum asked "Is Satish Chandra a defence analyst like Zaid Hamid or something?" (The following post was later deleted by the moderators of that forum):- "Satish Chandra's biography is in Marquis' Who's Who in America (2008 and earlier editions) and in Who's Who in the World (2009 edition). There is an expression in Sanskrit "Neti, neti" which means "Not this, not this"; it is applied to God and means that any description of God in particular terms is inadequate/incorrect because no matter how you try to describe Him, God is a lot more than that. Some people (for example, a professor of philosophy at a United States university) have suggested that Satish Chandra is an incarnation of God ("avatar"). He is India's greatest scientist and the greatest living Indian, but he is unknown to the Indian public, for reasons of the kind that are indicated in posts number 21 and 22 of this thread. He has been responsible for India's nuclear weapons and strategic program -- it was a letter of his to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December '82 which resulted in the start of India's Integrated Guided Missiles Program and the Center for Advanced Technology, for example -- but his theory of money was responsible for the "New Economy" that U.S. president Clinton celebrated which, as Clinton's successor Bush told India's Jaswant Singh later on, has brought immense wealth to the United States (see How India's Economy Can Grow 30% Per year Or More ). He is an engineer, a behavior scientist and a lot more; he has more higher education than anyone he knew on the Harvard University faculty (see his web page: Psychotherapy - eBoard ); he is also listed in Who's Who in Science and Engineering and Who's Who in Medicine and Healthcare. As is stated in post # 1 of this thread, he has been the only threat to the continuance of firangi rule over India. He is generally acknowledged to be the most patriotic Indian alive but, as can be seen in the posts at the beginning of this thread, he is going to destroy New Delhi/Delhi with a nuclear explosion ("Neti, neti"). When, after the 1998 nuclear tests by India, Satish Chandra expressed doubts about the loyalty and trustworthiness of Vajpayee, who was prime minister, the control of India's nuclear weapons was taken away from Vajpayee and given to India's president, Narayanan. When prime minister, Vajpayee often referred to Satish Chandra simply as "Pakistan". When Benazir Bhutto was prime minister, she referred to the "game plan being hatched by extra-constitutional forces [meaning Satish Chandra] to come to power [in Pakistan]". When Gen. Musharraf assumed office after his coup, Satish Chandra, in a letter to the press, commented on it and Gen. Musharraf went on television just to say "Let no external forces think that they can take advantage of the prevailing situation". The best way to know about him is to read his blog: Nuclear Supremacy for India over U.S. in its entirety. By the way, Satish Chandra has said that India's RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. and has been responsible for almost all of the terrorism in India since 1983; see post # 1 in the thread by Ali.009 in this forum -- http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html -- and RAW sends its operatives to post a lot of abuse of Satish Chandra on forums like this." On the Bharat-Rakshak forum, the agenda of the C.I.A.-RAW operatives who control and moderate it has been to keep the focus of Indians firmly on fighting muslims -- internal or external -- or Chinese and away from fighting the real enemy, the white countries. The same has been the agenda of BJP politicians, including Varun Gandhi. The agenda of C.I.A.-RAW includes keeping members of the Nehru family, including Varun, in the news, through whatever 'controversies', etc. that come handy and keeping the greatest living Indian out of the news and unknown to the Indian public. I had first written to Indira Gandhi when I saw her, as prime minister, being interviewed and brow-beaten by American journalists on a Sunday noon-time television program after she had declared the Emergency, jailed thousands of political opponents, etc. and she tried to deflect the hostility by biting her lip, like a shy girl, at the end of the program, a gesture which the producers made sure to put on the air. One of my letters to her included a reference to "planting trees" -- a program Sanjay Gandhi had initiated during the Emergency -- among several examples of the externally observable things that could be promoted by applying behavioral principles; she had made a reference to something like 'inner strength' as a goal after my earlier letters and I had then made the point that it is better to focus on externally observable forms of behavior and mentioned "planting trees" among several examples of externally observable and measurable forms of behavior that should be focused upon; nothing I wrote suggested or condoned things like forced sterilization. Because of my approving reference to "planting trees", a program initiated by Sanjay, he suddenly became the dictator of India, more powerful than and over-ruling his mother -- whom he later took to slapping in front of others, because with my first letter to Indira Gandhi, I had included a copy of my letter to Skinner in which I referred to "promotion of reverence by the young for the old, the partial stigmatization of wealth and worldly achievement" as examples of characteristics of the Indian culture which promote "stability" versus the Western idea of "progress"; after this Indira Gandhi had started rebuking people who touched her feet. In that first letter to Indira Gandhi, I said 'I have noted with interest your recent statements re limitations of the concept of liberty' and included a paperback copy of Skinner's "Beyond Freedom and Dignity" to enable India's prime minister not to be brow-beaten by American journalists so India's prime minister does not have to bite her lip like a shy girl toward Americans as I saw her do in that television interview. At the time I wrote that first letter to her in 1975, I had had to retreat from that psychology department, going only before seven A.M. once in a couple of weeks to check my mailbox, because of the brutal and violent behavior of faculty members after I had written that paper, described above and their violation of my freedom and dignity before I wrote that first letter to Indira Gandhi; in my letter I mentioned Skinner having been voted the most influential living psychologist and one of the two most influential psychologists of all time by American psychology department chairpersons; in that letter I also said that Skinner's theory of man and his theory of knowledge is "very close to the Indian one" and that "I will be writing a paper on this". I wrote in an account, titled "The Soviet Coup", more than fifteen years later -- which also described that paper of mine being a "coup" which led to Skinner's question and answer session with his followers in which Skinner was 'so to speak, pulled down from his pedestal by his own followers', my starving in that MIT dormitory and almost being jailed after being falsely accused of stealing a handful of cereal (when I mentioned so starving to an American woman I had bought a meal for in a Boston restaurant many years later, she said 'Like in India!') and after receiving which the CBS television network sent me a certified letter, return receipt requested, expressing an interest in doing a 'Sixty Minutes' story on me, to which I did not reply -- that my letters "galvanised her and turned the political tide for her" but "through euphoria and overconfidence of her son, led her to call an election which sent her out of power and facing an inquiry commission for fascistic crimes ...". After she had lost that election and I came to Harvard and met Skinner, he referred to my thinking being "very close" to his and asked me "What is knowledge?" -- perhaps suggesting I write that paper I said in my first letter to Indira Gandhi I will be writing -- U.S. intelligence agencies were keeping him and many others fully informed of my letters to her and racing my letters to her as soon as written, without waiting for delivery by mail -- but I did not oblige. After Sanjay became the dictator of India after and because of my reference to "planting trees" among examples of externally observable forms of behavior, he referred, in a speech in Rajasthan, dismissively to "imported ideologies" -- because of my enclosing a copy of Skinner's "Beyond Freedom and Dignity" to enable his mother, the prime minister, to stand up to the Americans and not degrade India by behaving like a shy girl, biting her lip, toward them. Later, when I was starving in that MIT graduate dormitory and threatened with being 'locked up' (see above) after being falsely accused of stealing a handful of cereal, Sanjay Gandhi died in a crash of his IMPORTED sport plane, engineered by the C.I.A. at his mother's request, because he had taken to slapping her in front of others because of my reference to 'the promotion of reverence by the young for the old' (above) -- as I have described in the letter dated May 11, 2005 below. The "information imperialism" referred to in that letter continues to keep the greatest living Indian unknown to the Indian public. On July 25, 2008, below, I wrote:- "Who will be destroyed by the nuclear bomb in New Delhi besides the Laloo Yadavs and Chatterjees (see below)? A bent old man who bent even lower to the Yadavs the day after he recorded the Yadavs, with bags of money, facilitating the invasion of India by firangis and was himself recorded, with folded hands, paying obeisance to the Yadavs. The military and the civil servants who have always been loyal to the firangis (see below). The population of Delhi/New Delhi which, by the hundreds of thousands, stood and watched silently India’s emperor, after surrendering his sword, arrested and led away by a lone Englishman with “fifty black sowars” -- the Englishman sent the Indian emperor’s jewel-encrusted sword to the British monarch -- though, as the Englishman wrote home to England, anyone of them -- his fifty black sowars -- could have brought him down with a single shot.Why did the Indian emperor have to surrender his sword to the lone firangi and submit to being arrested? He had a sword but he lacked supremacy in arms. Today supremacy in arms is nuclear supremacy. No one in Delhi/New Delhi wants nuclear supremacy for India. These are the people who will be destroyed." Why did India's prime minister have to bite her lip like a shy girl to appease Americans? India's prime minister did not have supremacy in arms. Why did India's greatest scientist have to starve while the Indians at MIT silently watched and some actively collaborated with the Americans in his degradation, like Delhi's population silently watched India's emperor arrested by a lone Englishman and the "fifty black sowars" actively collaborated in it? Because, as in 1858, India does not have supremacy in arms. India's armed forces today are just like those fifty black sowars as are all civil servants, RAW, etc. and the population at large is just like the residents of Delhi in 1858, only worse. Indira Gandhi is considered like "Durga" for taking military action in Bangladesh but in fact she had to go seek permission of the White Master for that and the U.S. president, Nixon, kept her waiting 45 minutes before seeing her. I have brought India to the point where it can destroy its enemy with just two twenty kiloton warheads delivered to Washington and New York, with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities like Chicago if there is any retaliation and suddenly increase its power millions of times -- despite the treachery of India's prime ministers and the slavishness of the Indian people. A piece of Indian dog-faeces on Bharat-Rakshak says:- --------------------------------------------------------------- Lets institute an award for Noam Chomsky's pup. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Another piece of Indian dog-faeces on Bharat-Rakshak replies:- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Arjun wrote: Lets institute an award for Noam Chomsky's pup. Saar.. these wannabe **** are not worthy of standing 6 miles from him. They quoute him or use his name to increase their Image/stock in public view. :self edited: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- As I said about 28 years ago in a letter to the United Nations Secretary General a copy of which I sent to Brajesh Mishra who was then India's ambassador to the U.N., my rat experiment "accomplished in a few hours as much as Skinner did in a life-time of experimentation" and that Skinner's letter to me about the paper in BEHAVIORISM accurately reflected our "relative intellectual and scientific excellence". In fact that rat experiment did more, a lot more than Skinner accomplished in a life time of experimentation. I have never considered Chomsky anything but third rate. Right after writing the paper, in the Spring of 1974, which I later published in the Spring '76 issue of BEHAVIORISM, I said to a member of my program committee that Chomsky "doesn't know the most elementary things" about Skinner's system and how his criticisms of Skinner's system were based on such ignorance and utter lack of understanding. In a subsequent paper also after which the Editor of BEHAVIORISM followed me out of the room where I read it in May, 1977 I showed this about "Chomsky's famous review" of Skinner's 'Verbal Behavior' which was published over 40 years ago and made Chomsky's career. Skinner himself wrote he had started reading that review of 'Verbal Behavior', saw that Chomsky had misunderstood him and "put it aside" and never read it later. After I was ousted from Harvard, Skinner began to butter up Chomsky as well. Around 1980-81 I said to the student who distributed my pamphlet at Boston University later that I thought Skinner had put the C.I.A. on me "to get the evidence on the jews". Chomsky was promoted by the jews to take control of psychology and philosophy, as they did a Canadian jew -- who is fourth rate -- after I was ousted by them from Harvard and from the field. I have referred below to the greatest living Indian's toe nail clippings being worth more to India and the world than the rest of the billion-plus Indians combined. The C.I.A. has been spending at least hundreds of millions of dollars per year for 32 years on suppressing this Indian so they can flush Indians like the pieces of dog-faeces above out to sea. The behavior of the pieces of dog-faeces above reminds me of an episode in that psychology department. I had signed up for an office in the Psychological Clinic to see a client in. The client was waiting but whoever was using that office during the previous hour had not come out so I could use it. I gently knocked on the door. A female graduate student, one or two years junior to me in the program, came out and said "I am going to clobber you! I am going to clobber you!" I wrote her about a four page letter explaining how my client had had an emergency and it was important for me to see him, that I had knocked with a volume and rhythm calculated not to disturb any state of relaxation her client might be in, etc. and said how I had entertained nothing but positive feelings toward her and had "shown it" -- I had her and a male classmate of hers over for dinner earlier -- and ended "Even now I hold no lasting grudge and will continue to work for good relations, as colleagues if not friends". Apparently that letter of mine to her was known to all the faculty members because, after I had written that paper which I later published in BEHAVIORISM, a member of my program committee said to me "Who's been leaning on you?" then himself added "EVERYBODY!"; he was alluding to her as he had earlier said something to me about her. He listed three or four categories of people who get mistreated because of a lack of power, among them foreigners (there were at least two full professors, both male, in that clinical psychology program who were shorter than me, for those who , such as J. K. Galbraith when alluding to my letter in Patriot referred to above and explaining my encompassing several volumes in one sentence about "Science and other intellectual products" in that letter, appeal to such variables). But a few days later it was this faculty member who said to me "Don't open that box or you will have to do it without the Ph.D." and outlined the program of slavery they had for me. After I had submitted that paper but before anyone had read it, he had referred to me, speaking to me, as a "cockroach" who had escaped being crushed. At Harvard, Skinner said to me "In England you will be called colored". I replied "I am colored!", then added "I don't think you are white. I don't think anyone here is white". At this he replied "I'll be ill if I were white". Then he suggested I take a computer programming job with a temporary employment agency because some firms hire minorities under affirmative action programs and said "You have suffered because of race" and might now benefit because of race through affirmative action programs. It all boils down to the conquest of territory. The British conquerors were patronising Indians and perhaps magnanimously allowing them a few upper level government jobs in India itself. India has to reverse this and conquer the territory of the United States and push the white population into Canada. I have shown how it can do this by means of a first strike with just two twenty kiloton warheads on Washington and New York, with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. ADDED ON MAY 11, 2009: Vajpayee was not the only C.I.A. agent in charge of India's national security (the same is the case with those in charge of India's national security now):- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2005/04/brijesh-mishra-cia-agent.html :- Brijesh Mishra a CIA agent? On September 27, 2001 Rahul Gandhi MP and his Columbian live in girlfriend of Kerala backwater tourist centre fame, Juanita alias Veronique,was arrested in United States of America's Logan airport in Boston, bythe FBI. Rahul was having an Italian passport and was carrying suitcasefull of dollars. Some say it was about $2 billion or was it $2 million.This huge dollar amount generated suspicion with the US authorities.Rahul and his girl friend was thus detained by FBI. FBI suspected thatRahul was carrying terrorist funds or drug money for laundering in US.Rahul called his mother Sonia Gandhi in India. In turn Sonia calledBrijesh Mishra, the former National Security Advisor and a key aide toformer prime minister Atal Behari Vajpayee at the Prime Ministers Office.Brijesh Mishra intervened on behalf of our PM Vajpayee with the USAdministration for the release Rahul from FBI custody. Rahul Gandhi wasreleased only when the Indian Ambassador intervened and gave assurances tothe State Department that Rahul Gandhi will be produced for any futureenquiry by FBI. Not only that as a patriot, it was the duty of BrijeshMishra to find out the reasons for the arrest and inform our CBI to takenecessary further steps. Brijesh Mishra did not do any such thing. Theincident clearly shows that Brajesh Mishra was working for Sonia, that hehad deep connections with US state department. In short Brijesh Mishra isa traitor.In Sep 2004 when Washington played host to Young political sons, SachinPilot, Milind Deora, Jitin Prasada (all Congress Party), and ManvendraSingh (a lone BJP fellow) followed by liquor baron who got himself electedto a the Rajya Sabha, Vijay Mallya (Janata Party) and ever smiling RajivShukla of the Congress. Yet one prominent face was missing which was thatof Rahul Gandhi. Rahul Gandhi didn't go to USA with the youngpoliticians. It was Shukla who conceived the idea of the Indo-USParliamentary Forum to create a counterpart to the India Caucus in the USHouse of Representatives. Rahul Gandhi had to avoid going to the U.S.forever, because of the pending police questions he could be arrestedagain by FBI if he ever steps in to US. What money Rahul Gandhi wascarrying? Was it another Bofors type pay off? Was it Columbian drugmoney on behalf of his Columbian girl friend? Or was it fund for Osama BinLaden group, as it is known that the Muslim terrorists are usingChristians as front men for laundering terrorist funds as the normalbanking channels are being monitored by FBI.Brijesh Mishra has strong connections with Sonia Gandhi's Italian familythrough his daughter Jyotsna. Jyotsna is married to an Italian and livesin Italy. So it is not surprising that there was no investigation whenSonia lied about her birth date, and birth place. Sonia Gandhi firstdeclared her birth date as 1944 and birth place as Luciana. This wasconfirmed by the Italian embassy which submitted her birth certificate toour Home ministry in 1983. Sonia Gandhi's name was Antonia Maino as perthis certificate. This true birth certificate was submitted by theItalian embassy to the Indian Home Ministry when Antonia Maino applied forIndian citizenship. When Rajiv Gandhi married Antonia Maino newspapershad written that both of them were of the same age. It also confirms thatSonia's birth year was 1944. . Antonia Maino's father, who was a masonand a fascist, Signor Stefano Maino, was a prisoner-of-war in Russia from1942 till Italy surrendered to the Allies in 1945. It is obvious thatMaino cannot be the father of Antonia Maino. So the date of birth andplace of birth of Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi had to be changed tocover up this fact. Her new date of birth became December 9, 1946, andher place of birth became Orbassano. . Instead of investigating allthese fraud by Sonia Gandhi, Brijesh was working for Sonia Gandhi whileheading Prime Minister Vajpayee's Office. Even after the UPA governmentcame in to power Brijesh is holding a secret official position in thepresent UPA government that entitles him to a diplomatic passport. Thisshould be called the biggest treachery in modern India.Brajesh Mishra refused to authorize from February to May 2004 period thearrest of the CIA spy in RAW, .Rabinder Singh, despite repeated requestfor permission. This urgent request for arrest was asked by RAW officialMr.Amar Bhushan. It looks like Brijesh Mishra himself was working for CIAand thus by not permitting the arrest of a traitor enabled the CIA spy,Rabinder Singh to escape to USA in mid May 2004. From this one can guessthe capability of our Vajpayee who only dropped the corrupt N.K.Singh, butrefused to let go the traitor Brijesh Mishra in spite of warnings. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The elections in progress must be stopped until the national security issues have been addressed (see above and below). There were millions of Indians who served in the British Indian army under a few thousand British officers. Those Indians served the imperialist purposes of the British against India and were traitors serving India's enemies. Complaining about Indians not being given employment opportunities by restrictions on the U.S. H1-B visa program is like complaining about Indians not being given employment opportunities to serve in the British Indian army to serve the purposes of India's enemies. To say that India will not implement the nuclear deal if the U.S. imposes restrictions on such employment opportunities for Indians shows utter imbecility and ignorance of the basics of human relations and power or of economics and statecraft; it makes this BJP politician unfit for any thing other than to be a shoe-polisher of the White Master which is what all Indian politicians are; there are infinitely better reasons not to implement the nuclear deal (see below) as there are infinitely better ways of providing employment opportunities to Indians (see below). There is only one Indian who can save Indians from themselves. First these elections have to be stopped on the grounds of national security. As for the foreign exchange such employment brings, I have said, in a column which appeared in Indian Express, Delhi, over 15 years ago that if such economists were made into canned dog food and exported to earn foreign exchange, that is about all the foreign exchange India really needs; the rest is a creation of people of this type. The same is true of politicians and many others. See what I have said below about the foreign exchange that SEZs and various kinds of outsourced work -- software, BPOs, etc. -- bring. As for an international 'free market' in labor that imbeciles such as Subramanian Swamy advocate, the less said the better. As for the "Harvard-educated" people Indian newspapers, etc., extol, well, any bullock-cart driver has better sense than these people. When African slaves were bought and sold in America's free markets, the role they played in America's economy had nothing in common with the role a white field hand doing similar-looking work played. Technically and in very simplified terms, this is the formalistic fallacy, looking at the form of behavior without looking at the controlling variables. The role that Indian 'techies' working for Americans play has nothing in common with the role American 'techies' play. This applies just as much to entrepreneurs and billionaires. The difference is in power and dominance just as it was with the few British officers and their far more numerous Indian sepoys or the lone Englishman and the fifty black sowars. It explains why the fifty black sowars, any one of whom could have brought him down with a single shot, did not do so. It was because of this when an American motor-cycle rider with an American chess player were talking near me about the American space shuttle in a Harvard Square cafe -- this was just before the shuttle Challenger disaster occurred whose significance I will not go into -- the former joked about the possibility of the Israelis 'hijacking' the shuttle -- an Israeli was going to be in the crew -- but added at least they will do a "professional job". When they were talking about its not being a "true shuttle", I commented "They discard the boosters". The chess player then simply nodded saying "What goes up must come down" but the motor-cyclist, curling his lips with contempt at the temerity of an Indian in commenting about the shuttle, referred to all the "janitors and engineers" (meaning janitors from Mexico, etc. and engineers from India, etc.) "who keep things going". After the Challenger disaster I reminded the chess player of his companion's comment about "janitors and engineers" but he did not take the point. I have referred above (addendum dated March 18, 2009) to a New York Times columnist writing about "external cognitive servants" -- such as Indians in Bangalore -- doing Americans' work and later, when I said, in an E-Mail to an American 'People are careless about grammar and spelling in E-Mail and I don't like that ... but your E-Mails are perfect', a female columnist in the same newspaper wrote a column headed "A penny for my thoughts" about paying slave wages to someone in Bangalore to write her columns. It is for such slave work that these imbecile Indians are fighting in exchange for entering the even deeper slavery of the nuclear deal. Even Indian billionaires such as the Ambanis fronting for American exploitation of Indians -- as in their refineries SEZ project I have referred to below -- are such slaves. As I have shown below, even for material prosperity, leaving aside psychological prosperity, such work is disastrous. See, for example, what I have said below:- "Slavery in nuclear matters also makes possible slavery in economic matters. In Special Economic Zones (SEZs), American companies use Indians as slave laborers-- paying them a fraction of what even the lowest paid American workers are paid-- to produce goods and services for the American consumer. In no way can the output of Special Economic Zones be considered a part of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), nor should the output of software export and call center, etc. (B.P.O.) operations--which meet the needs of American companies and American consumers-- be considered a part of India's GDP and most of the rise in GDP growth rate, being trumpeted by traitors, is from the SEZs and IT and B.P.O. operations. If a foreign enemy comes and commandeers millions of Indians to work as slave labor to meet the needs of its own people-- having them work within India rather than shipping them to America as slaves used to be shipped through native middlemen to pick cotton-- it is still slavery. I have written about the fallacy because of which exports and earning a lot of foreign exchange are considered a good thing and said 'A crore of goods and services sold domestically is worth several crores of goods and services sold abroad so far as the effect on India's prosperity is concerned'. The foreign exchange (such as dollars) you get by selling goods and services abroad can only ultimately be used to buy goods and services abroad which starts chains of economic activity in the foreign country (the United States) rather than in your own country and, through the 'multiplier effect' I have described, increases the GDP of the foreign country by several times the amount of the foreign exchange you obtained, not your own country's. A report on a mega refinery complex being set up in an SEZ on India's west coast by Reliance refers to the several thousand luxurious villas that will be built for foreign workers while Indian slave laborers will live in slave housing; the output of the refinery --gasoline-- will be used almost exclusively by American consumers but the environmental harm caused by the refinery will occur in India; by using Indian companies as a front-- in this case Reliance into which Americans will be putting their money-- American capital will be producing gasoline for American consumers using Indians as slave labor and transferring the pollution caused by the refineries to India. In no way can this SEZ be called a part of India's economy. Even in the IT sector, the largest Indian company-- Infosys-- is more than half owned by foreigners; hundreds of thousands of engineering graduates per year are being produced by Indian engineering colleges -- RAW, which runs the Indian government, acts as a branch of the C.I.A. against India and has engineered this use of Indian engineering graduates-- to work as software coolies for American companies (you do not need engineering graduates to provide payroll processing which is what Indian software coolies have mostly been doing) while many others work night shifts in the B.P.O. industry, in call centers, doing what does not require even a high school education to do in the United States. SEZs were set up in China by bribing people in the Chinese government to let American companies use Chinese people as slave labor for American consumers and all the Chinese in government now wear Western suits and send as many Chinese for higher studies and to settle in the U.S. as do Indians. To camouflage the true nature of this arrangement, the United States government regularly 'complains' to the Chinese government about the U.S. "trade deficit" with China, but in no way can American companies producing in China, using Chinese as slave laborers, for the American consumer and then shipping the products to the United States be considered 'trade'; it is slave trade but instead of the slaves' bodies, their products are being shipped to the United States. Because of Indians knowing English, Americans first used Indians for IT and B.P.O. but are now switching to manufacture as well, the basic paradigm being the use of the populations of China and India as slave labor for the American consumer by bribing people in the governments of these countries. In the case of Russia, the paradigm is to loot Russia's natural resources for the American consumer by bribing people in the Russian government. Because of the exchange rate, the slave laborers in the B.P.O., doing health-destroying work at night at a fraction of the wage rates of the lowest paid American workers, are paid large amounts in rupees (the foreign exchange goes to the government and can only be used ultimately to buy foreign goods and services and increase the foreign country's GDP, not India's, as I have said) which enables them to buy the output of ten times as many Indians while producing nothing for the Indian economy-- the goods and services they produce meet the needs of American consumers and companies, not Indian consumers and companies. One million B.P.O. workers suck up the output of, say, ten million Indians; ten million B.P.O. workers will suck up the output of a hundred million Indians, while producing nothing for the Indian economy. Thus, American companies, while using ten million Indians as direct slave laborers, will be using a hundred million Indians as indirect slave laborers because a hundred million Indians will be supporting the ten million Indians working for American companies as slave laborers. And, since these ten million Indians will be producing nothing for the Indian economy (no goods or services for the Indian consumer) and will be sucking up the output of another one hundred million Indians-- thus, they will be greatly REDUCING India's GDP available to the rest of the population, not adding to it-- the rupee salaries paid to these ten million Indians will be highly inflationary as well, further damaging the Indian economy. This applies to operations such as call centers (B.P.O.), software export and SEZs for export. Haryana's chief minister asked how else to provide employment to the state's population. By implementing my proposal about money [see below], India can have true and extremely rapid prosperity and full employment." To quote Milton again, it is better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven. But the demons wouldn't let you alone in your poverty and come and invade you. That is why they have to be destroyed first. To put it as simply as possible, the white man is the demon that has to be destroyed (see press release dated November 8, 2008 below). Psychologist Carl Jung often referred to the aggressive, domineering blue-eyed blonde white as the affliction of mankind and castigated the British for their arrogant attitude toward Indians. Destroying the whites equals rescuing the gentle dark-skinned people from the aggression of the white man. It was the dark-skinned Krishna who said: "Paritranaya Sadhunam Vinashayacha Dushkritam Dharma Samsthapanarthaya Sambhavami Yuge Yuge". If my guidance was good enough for Indira Gandhi as Prime Minister 34 years ago, it should be good enough for Indians now. The guidance I am providing now is "Nuclear Supremacy, Not Nuclear Deal" (see below). ADDED ON MAY 13, 2009: The following E-Mail has been sent to the Election Commission of India, New Delhi, today:- Date: May 13, 2009 From: Satish Chandra Telephone: 01-617-282-4996 FAX: 01-617-825-4973 E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com To: Members of the Election Commission, New Delhi C/O feedback@eci.gov.in, ashishs@eci.gov.in, kakumar@eci.gov.in, rksrivastava@eci.gov.in, kfwilfred@eci.gov.in, ystandhope@eci.gov.in, skrudola@eci.gov.in, jaipriye@eci.gov.in, balakrish@eci.gov.in, dralokshukla@eci.gov.in Dear Sirs: With reference to the last paragraph of the addendum dated May 11, 2009 below and the rest of the Press Release dated November 14, 2008-May 11, 2009 below, this is to request that the counting of the votes in the just concluded elections be withheld or halted, on the grounds of national security, till the national security issues have been addressed. Sincerely, Satish Chandra CC: Major Indian media organs Date: May 13, 2009 (Second letter of this date) From: Satish Chandra Telephone: 01-617-282-4996 FAX: 01-617-825-4973 E-Mail: satchandra24@hotmail.com To: Members of the Election Commission, New Delhi C/O feedback@eci.gov.in, ashishs@eci.gov.in, kakumar@eci.gov.in, rksrivastava@eci.gov.in, kfwilfred@eci.gov.in, ystandhope@eci.gov.in, skrudola@eci.gov.in, jaipriye@eci.gov.in, balakrish@eci.gov.in, dralokshukla@eci.gov.in Dear Sirs: With reference to my earlier letter of today's date to you (included below), the national security issues I referred to in it include the following: in my addendum dated February 26, 2006 (below), titled "National security crisis due to microwaves from satellites", I say "This shows that the C.I.A. can control any digital equipment, not just computers, by microwaves from satellites. This applies to all digital equipment, such as that used in a multitude of defence applications, electric power grids, nuclear power plants, etc., even if the equipment is not connected to the outside world by telephone lines." This includes electronic voting machines; the United States has the ability to manipulate vote counts in electronic voting machines by microwaves from satellites. I repeat my request that the counting of votes in the just concluded elections be withheld or halted, on the grounds of national security, till the national security issues have been addressed. Sincerely, Satish Chandra CC: Major Indian media organs ADDED ON MAY 14, 2009: Since I refer to my addendum dated February 26 '09 in my second letter dated May 13 '09, above, to the Election Commission (I have received no response so far) about national security issues: an Indian missile man on the Bharat-Rakshak forum once referred to Indians' concerns being to "get paid, make babies, chase girls". Although DRDO has been far more concerned about national security than the armed forces, politicians, civil servants, the media, etc. -- which actively undermine it -- or the general public, even DRDO has been rather indifferent to national security, such as by submitting to 'collaborations' with India's enemies such as Israel, failing to destroy India's enemies in New Delhi by obeying India's sovereign, etc.; such collaborations amount to engaging in activities that constitute a faux defence of India and, therefore, by providing a false sense of security, when genuine security is possible, undermine India's national security which undermines everything else, including India's economy. I have referred below to bought -up nuclear scientists sabotaging India's indigenous program in various ways. DRDO officials -- bought up or not -- are now sabotaging India's indigenous programs by saying they cannot provide an anti-ballistic missile defence system before 2020 and that, too, with Israeli help -- whereas a year or so ago they were saying India's indigenous ABM system will be operational in three years (see below) -- and supporting spending billions upon billions of dollars for Israeli missiles (for which C.I.A.-RAW-controlled Army officers provided a false excuse by citing an imminent Chinese threat, never mind the continuing enemy action by the United States and Israel), technology and help instead of putting the money in indigenous efforts. I have said DRDO are India's real warriors, not the armed forces. India's warriors have to obey India's sovereign. ADDED ON MAY 16, 2009: It is no use developing bigger and better missiles if you don't use what you have to destroy India's enemies IN A TIMELY FASHION, now that the elections -- decided by the C.I.A. by microwaves from satellites -- are over. India is being hijacked by India's enemies; are India's missile men going to continue to "get paid, make babies, chase girls" or are they going to obey India's sovereign and destroy India's enemies with the weapons they already have? I am looking for some trace, some spark of life in India's missile men that will allow India to survive. The following is a post I made on Pakistan Defence Forum today:- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A headline says: "Pak will retain nukes at any cost: PM". What is the use of retaining nukes if you don't use them against the aggressor who is carrying out missile attacks from drones on your territory several times a month? To see how to use your nukes against the United States, see my blog. Do you have any idea what the United States will do if you carried out even one drone attack on its territory? Similarly, I have said to India's missile men (see my blog below): "It is no use developing bigger and better missiles if you don't use what you have to destroy India's enemies IN A TIMELY FASHION, now that the elections -- decided by the C.I.A. by microwaves from satellites -- are over. India is being hijacked by India's enemies; are India's missile men going to continue to "get paid, make babies, chase girls" or are they going to obey India's sovereign and destroy India's enemies with the weapons they already have? I am looking for some trace, some spark of life in India's missile men that will allow India to survive." What do I mean by 'a trace, a spark of life'? This is what I wrote about that: "The population of Delhi/New Delhi which, by the hundreds of thousands, stood and watched silently India’s emperor, after surrendering his sword, arrested and led away by a lone Englishman with “fifty black sowars” -- the Englishman sent the Indian emperor’s jewel-encrusted sword to the British monarch -- though, as the Englishman wrote home to England, anyone of them -- his fifty black sowars -- could have brought him down with a single shot." Neither the population of Delhi in 1858 nor those fifty black sowars had a trace, a spark of life. In a letter dated June 27, 2004 to the press, I wrote “Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness -- perceived by yourself and others -- to use your arms is zero, their value -- deterrent and other -- is zero. The United States has a decisive advantage -- ideological, economic and military -- over the rest of the world because of its demonstrated willingness to use its nuclear arms.” This applies as much to the use of nuclear arms within the country against agents of a foreign power -- the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi will be the first such use of nuclear arms -- as outside the country. Also, as I have repeatedly emphasised, nuclear arms against the United States are needed not to “deter” it but to actually destroy it because the United States, by its nature, will be constantly striving for nuclear supremacy, that is, to overcome deterrence. In other words, the United States cannot be deterred, only destroyed. For this India needs nuclear supremacy over the United States and a minimum of ten thousand nuclear warheads -- an objective that is well within India’s reach; attaining this objective requires the nuclear destruction of New Delhi/ Delhi first." See also: Actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDED ON MAY 18, 2009: A U.S. intelligence operative I referred to in the addendum dated April 24, 2009 above who "lives in the U.S. making missiles for the U.S. government and, among other things, collects intelligence on Indian missiles and other subjects for U.S. intelligence agencies", threatened to ban anyone on the Bharat-Rakshak forum who mentions any rigging in the just concluded elections. Anyone who refers to what I say is banned. After I started posting on the blog of a former head of RAW, Vikram Sood, K. Subrahmanyam pleaded with him to delete all my posts and he deleted them. An example of any mention of vote count manipulation being squelched by threat of a ban from Bharat Rakshak:- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Raju) Quote: "I wonder how i got only 5 votes from an area that is a Shiv Sena stronghold," the defeated candidate said" reports like this are coming from many places. this election year saw maximum number of malfunctioning EVM's. Isnt' that curious ? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Raju) Quote: "It should be mention that in this election, for the first time, the EC is using a new "totaliser" technology for mixing results from all booths." Have they tied up with Diebold who created new software in which if one pressed on John Kerry's name, he got a slip with George Bush pic thanking him for voting Bush. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Sanjay M) I think that we need to get away from Electronic Voting Machines, and towards a voting system with an audit trail. Convenience must not take precedence over accuracy and robustness, otherwise democracy will inevitably be jeopardized. When you see how vigorously power is contested in India, all the more reason to fear that shortcuts will be taken. And an electronic system offers the most opportunity for shortcuts, without immediately revealing it. I can't help but notice that the biggest winner in the entire election was the United States. All parties that have toed America's line have done well, and all parties that are seen as thorns in the side of US interests have done poorly. An odd coincidence. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By sanjaychoudhry) Quote: "I can't help but notice that the biggest winner in the entire election was the United States. All parties that have toed America's line have done well, and all parties that are seen as thorns in the side of US interests have done poorly. An odd coincidence." This is what has been troubling me since yesterday. Something stinks. The results are bizzare. Tony Blair and other Goras have been praising Rahul Gandhi publicly at every opportunity and calling him prime minister material for India. And lo and behold, the results that have come up have trounced everyone -- whether right or left -- except the Congress. Rahul Gandhi has in one shot emerged as a legitimate prime ministerial candidate much praised for his "organisational" skills when we all know he cannot speak a single sentence coherently.I am not convinced that there has been no manipulation. Notice the way Congress has gone out of its way to plant Navin Chawla in EC. The truth may come out in some years as some people involved in the fraud begin to leak information. I think the Congress has been ably assisted by the "international community" in this game. The fraud may have not been everywhere, but restricted to some make-or-break states to avoid creating a pattern. I think the BJP ruled states have largely been left alone, but states where its allies were contesting were targetted, along with smaller states such as Uttarkhand which can have a "Congress landslide" without arousing too much attention. The two make or break states were AP and TN, both contested by potential BJP allies. Is it a coincidence that 80 percent of the 2.5 billion dollars "charity money" flowing from the Goras into India every year is headed straight to these two states only? This is according to the figures released by the home ministry. If the BJP is smart and the "international community" is to be thwarted, it will campaign for going back to the paper based ballotting which can be audited. Many countries have discontinued EVMs and gone back to paper ballot due to the unreliability of EVMs and their fraud potential. Even the US agencies evaluated EVMs and rejected them and decided to continue with paper ballots. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Raju) Quote: "A muslim friend of mine told me that while pressing their party symbol DMK’s symbol flashed. . I can’t say whether the election was free and fair in other parts of India but it certainly wasn’t in Chennai." holy moly. Diebold marks its arrival in India. Quote: "Many voters couldn’t vote because their names were removed from the lists at the last minute. Caste and Religious profiling was done to lessen the damage to DMK. I am a witness to this. In my family 5 were registered voters only one was able to vote on the election day." so there has been a combination of tools used, not just reliance of one single tool. this is what is confusing and despiriting the opposition ranks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (By Raju) EVM can be rigged at chip level or bypass introduced such as which indicates DMK light even when some other party has been selected, atleast a few rigged ones can be incorporated into the chain at last moment without attracting attention. those who are responsible for sending particular EVMs to particular booths can be planted by sarkari planted IB-types. This can be done in a way without raising much suspiscion. Party representatives always make noise if they feel the machines are rigged, but when a loser makes a noise the world automatically believes it is sour grapes because he lost rather than anything else. this is where media comes into picture, they need to take up such cases pro-actively. If they sit silent, then whole issu